Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted

2013-01-17 Thread Paul Hargrove
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > [snip] > >> I just now ran tests on OpenBSD-5.2/i386 and OpenBSD-5.2/amd64, using >> Clang-3.1. >> Unfortunately, there is a mass of linker error building libmpi_cxx.la(on >> both sys

[OMPI devel] MPI-2.2 status #2223, #3127

2013-01-17 Thread Kawashima, Takahiro
Hi, Fujitsu is interested in completing MPI-2.2 on Open MPI and Open MPI -based Fujitsu MPI. We've read wiki and tickets. These two tickets seem to be almost done but need testing and bug fixing. https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2223 MPI-2.2: MPI_Dist_graph_* functions missing ht

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted

2013-01-17 Thread Paul Hargrove
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: [snip] > I just now ran tests on OpenBSD-5.2/i386 and OpenBSD-5.2/amd64, using > Clang-3.1. > Unfortunately, there is a mass of linker error building libmpi_cxx.la (on > both systems) > I am trying again with --disable-mpi-cxx and will report

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted

2013-01-17 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Sweet. :) Sent from my phone. No type good. On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:59 PM, "Paul Hargrove" mailto:phhargr...@lbl.gov>> wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Paul Hargrove mailto:phhargr...@lbl.gov>> wrote: [snip] The BAD news is a new failure (SEGV in orted at exit) on OpenBSD-5.2/amd64, whic

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted

2013-01-17 Thread Paul Hargrove
Kenneth, I've built ompi w/ clang on other platforms before (incl. MacOSX Mountain Lion), but not on OpenBSD. I just now ran tests on OpenBSD-5.2/i386 and OpenBSD-5.2/amd64, using Clang-3.1. Unfortunately, there is a mass of linker error building libmpi_cxx.la (on both systems) I am trying again w

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted

2013-01-17 Thread Kenneth A. Lloyd
Paul, Have you tried llvm with clang? Ken From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hargrove Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:58 PM To: Open MPI Developers Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:26 PM,

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted

2013-01-17 Thread Paul Hargrove
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: [snip] > The BAD news is a new failure (SEGV in orted at exit) on > OpenBSD-5.2/amd64, which I will report in a separate email once I've > completed some triage. > [snip] You can disregard the "BAD news" above. Everything was fine with gcc, b

Re: [OMPI devel] [patch] MPI-2.2: Ordering of attribution deletion callbacks on MPI_COMM_SELF

2013-01-17 Thread KAWASHIMA Takahiro
Jeff, OK. I'll try implementing George's idea and then you can compare which one is simpler. Regards, KAWASHIMA Takahiro > Not that I'm aware of; that would be great. > > Unlike George, however, I'm not concerned about converting to linear > operations for attributes. > > Attributes are not u

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted

2013-01-17 Thread Paul Hargrove
Since I see OpenBSD twice on the list of changes, I've fired off my automated testing on my OpenBSD platforms. Since the "MPI datatype issues on OpenBSD" I reported against 1.7.0rc5 also appeared on FreeBSD-6.3, I've tested that platform as well. The good news is that the problems I've reported in

[OMPI devel] 1.6.4rc1 has been posted

2013-01-17 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
In the usual location: http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.6/ Here's a list of changes since 1.6.3: - Added performance improvements to the OpenIB (OpenFabrics) BTL. - Improved error message when process affinity fails. - Fixed MPI_MINLOC on man pages for MPI_REDUCE(_LOCAL). Thanks to

[OMPI devel] sanity check on 1.6.4 .so versions

2013-01-17 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Given that we've screwed this up before, could someone please sanity check the .so versions I'm planning on using for the 1.6.4 release. Only 2 libraries changed: libmpi and libopen-pal (most other changes were in VT and various components). No interfaces changed. Is this right? ## libmp

Re: [OMPI devel] [patch] MPI-2.2: Ordering of attribution deletion callbacks on MPI_COMM_SELF

2013-01-17 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Not that I'm aware of; that would be great. Unlike George, however, I'm not concerned about converting to linear operations for attributes. Attributes are not used often, but when they are: a) there aren't many of them (so a linear penalty is trivial) b) they're expected to be low performance

Re: [OMPI devel] [patch] MPI-2.2: Ordering of attribution deletion callbacks on MPI_COMM_SELF

2013-01-17 Thread KAWASHIMA Takahiro
George, Your idea makes sense. Is anyone working on it? If not, I'll try. Regards, KAWASHIMA Takahiro > Takahiro, > > Thanks for the patch. I deplore the lost of the hash table in the attribute > management, as the potential of transforming all attributes operation to a > linear complexity is

Re: [OMPI devel] [patch] MPI-2.2: Ordering of attribution deletion callbacks on MPI_COMM_SELF

2013-01-17 Thread George Bosilca
Takahiro, Thanks for the patch. I deplore the lost of the hash table in the attribute management, as the potential of transforming all attributes operation to a linear complexity is not very appealing. As you already took the decision C, it means that at the communicator destruction stage the