[OMPI devel] Shared library version numbers for 1.8.2

2014-07-08 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Here's what I think VERSION should be for 1.8.2: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/32165 I left comments in the VERSION file as to why I think each version number should change. Can someone please verify that this work is correct? If so, we can remove the comments (before the

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc git dev-163-g4825990)

2014-07-08 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc dev-163-g4825990 Start time: Tue Jul 8 21:01:01 EDT 2014 End time: Tue Jul 8 21:02:29 EDT 2014 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI BTL async progress prototype discussion meeting

2014-07-08 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
I got a lot of random calendar "accept" responses (i.e., "random" = "from people I don't know"). I was a little surprised; I had expected only core Open MPI developers to respond -- I sent it to the devel list (vs. sending to a specific list of people) purely out of laziness/convenience.

Re: [OMPI devel] segv in ompi_info

2014-07-08 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
I'm unable to replicate. Please provide more detail...? Is this a problem in the MXM component? On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Mike Dubman wrote: > > > $/usr/mpi/gcc/openmpi-1.8.2a1/bin/ompi_info -a -l 9|less > Caught signal 13 (Broken pipe) > backtrace >

[OMPI devel] segv in ompi_info

2014-07-08 Thread Mike Dubman
$/usr/mpi/gcc/openmpi-1.8.2a1/bin/ompi_info -a -l 9|less Caught signal 13 (Broken pipe) backtrace 2 0x00054cac mxm_handle_error() /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/mxm-3.2.2883/src/mxm/util/debug/debug.c:653 3 0x00054e74 mxm_error_signal_handler()

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.9 patch

2014-07-08 Thread Balaji, Pavan
Brice, On Jul 8, 2014, at 1:41 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > I ignored hunks #1 and #2 (mpich specific), applied hunks in diff.c, > ignored in topology-linux.c (don't see why they are needed), applied > topology-xml.c, applied a simpler change to topology.c. Things are in

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.9 patch

2014-07-08 Thread Brice Goglin
Hello, I ignored hunks #1 and #2 (mpich specific), applied hunks in diff.c, ignored in topology-linux.c (don't see why they are needed), applied topology-xml.c, applied a simpler change to topology.c. Things are in trunk. Brice Le 07/07/2014 20:06, Balaji, Pavan a écrit : > Folks, > > We are