We will try to address till the end of the week.
чт, 13 июля 2017 г. в 18:37, Barrett, Brian via devel <
devel@lists.open-mpi.org>:
> Mellanox developers -
>
> The btl sm header leak in the yoda spml brought up questions about the
> status of the yoda spml. My understanding was that Mellanox was
Mellanox developers -
The btl sm header leak in the yoda spml brought up questions about the status
of the yoda spml. My understanding was that Mellanox was going to remove it
after the decision that we didn’t require supporting btl transports and
Mellanox no longer wanting to support yoda. B
that might be interesting too : https://cla-assistant.io/
Cheers,
Gilles
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
wrote:
> That's a good point.
>
> Hmmm. How would it recognize a revert commit?
>
> Sidenote... I think we'll likely have more details soon (in an email? wiki?
> s
That's a good point.
Hmmm. How would it recognize a revert commit?
Sidenote... I think we'll likely have more details soon (in an email? wiki?
something...), but we had a great discussion about adding some more bots to our
GitHub usage.
We found this:
https://github.com/probot
(e.g.,
