[OMPI devel] How do you generate your FAQ pages?

2022-12-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove via devel
Sorry for the somewhat off-topic question: What tool(s) are you using to generate web pages for your wonderfully organized FAQ? -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove Pronouns: he, him, his Computer Languages & Systems Software (CLaSS) Group Computer Science Department Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Re: [OMPI devel] Remove Portals support?

2012-04-02 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ative Computing Laboratory * University of Tennessee * 1122 Volunteer Boulevard, suite 350 * Knoxville, TN 37996 * 865 974 9375 ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- P

Re: [OMPI devel] Open MPI nightly tarballs suspended / 1.5.5rc3

2012-02-28 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/28/2012 5:09 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote: On 29/02/12 07:44, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: > - BlueGene fixes rc3 fixes the builds on our front end node, thanks! And on a BG/L (not a typo) front-end too, where the same problem existed in prior versions. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargr

[OMPI devel] typo in a copyright message

2012-02-28 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
. + * Copyright (c) 2011 Los Alamos National Security, LLC. * All rights reserved. * $COPYRIGHT$ * -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley

Re: [OMPI devel] Open MPI nightly tarballs suspended / 1.5.5rc3

2012-02-28 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ixes - VT-specific CXXFLAGS - BlueGene fixes - Fix processor affinity for some old/weird platforms -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

[OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2 missing a Mellanox PCI vendor ID

2012-02-27 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
/ Given the amount of testing we've had, this rc might actually be pretty close. Lots and lots of changes since rc1; I'm not even going to bother to list them all. Please test! -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2 atomics fail w/ xlc-9

2012-02-24 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
nally inserting a cast, and I believe it should apply cleanly to both v1.5 branch (for v1.6) and to the trunk. -Paul On 2/24/2012 5:46 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Hmm, I was certain I knew what was wrong, but the tests still fail. Nobody should hold their breath waiting for my patches, but I am

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2 atomics fail w/ xlc-9

2012-02-24 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
, I think this is a 1.6 issue. -Paul On 2/24/2012 5:19 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I see now why I get "check" failures from the opal atomics w/ XLC-9.0. The inline asm is mildly incorrect and I am actually surprised gcc didn't produce bad code. Patch(es) will be sent ASAP as I th

[OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2 atomics fail w/ xlc-9

2012-02-24 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
I see now why I get "check" failures from the opal atomics w/ XLC-9.0. The inline asm is mildly incorrect and I am actually surprised gcc didn't produce bad code. Patch(es) will be sent ASAP as I think this should be fixed for 1.5.5. -Paul On 2/23/2012 8:24 PM, Paul H. Hargr

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2

2012-02-24 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
-AROUND to allow testing w/o waiting for the CMR to be processed. -Paul On 2/24/2012 1:14 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Christopher, Just wanted to note that when you build like this on the BG/P front end, VT is detecting the BG/P environment and so trying to build for the BG/P compute node

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2

2012-02-24 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
rg/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2

2012-02-23 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
-END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

2012-02-23 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Sorry folks. That was intended just for Jeff's eyes, but my fingers moved faster than my brain. No offense was intended. -Paul On 2/23/2012 10:01 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I think the VT folks get blamed often enough for build issues w/o attributing one more problem to them. On

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

2012-02-23 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
I think the VT folks get blamed often enough for build issues w/o attributing one more problem to them. On 2/23/2012 9:47 AM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: Cool; thanks for setting this straight. -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

2012-02-23 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
le shorter. On Feb 22, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I think I have the beginning of a fix for this issue. I had not even noticed earlier that the error in event.h is from the C++ compiler, when compiling file.cxx in the c++ bindings. That makes the vendor-specific addition of

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

2012-02-22 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Larry Baker US Geological Survey 650-329-5608 ba...@usgs.gov <mailto:ba...@usgs.gov> On 22 Feb 2012, at 5:55 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Folks at Oracle should decide, but I suspect "Solaris 10" should be updated to "Solaris 10 and 11", or just "11". -Paul On

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

2012-02-22 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
.2/bin/*cc* /Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/bin/i686-apple-darwin9-llvm-gcc-4.2 /Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/bin/llvm-gcc-4.2 /Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin9-llvm-gcc-4.2 Larry Baker US Geological Survey 650-329-5608 ba...@usgs.gov <mailto:ba...@usgs.gov> On 22 Feb 2012, at

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

2012-02-22 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
latforms (e.g., Linux on PPC64) - Microsoft Windows CCP (Microsoft Windows server 2003 and 2008); see the README.WINDOWS file. -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley N

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

2012-02-22 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
STLPORT is also defined. So, maybe I am over thinking this. -Paul On 2/21/2012 11:10 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: More notes: I've tested ompi-1.5.4 and it has the same problem. So, this is NOT a regression. Terry D. has observed that Ubuntu is NOT a supported platform for the Solaris Stu

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

2012-02-22 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
THE BUILD WAS SUCCESSFUL. So, one has 2 choices: + build w/ SS12.2 without VT + update to SS12.3 and have VT I don't think there is sufficient reason to delay 1.5.5 for this. -Paul On 2/21/2012 4:39 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: A few things to note: 1) This is NOT a problem w/ the SS12.3

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 r25914 DOA

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
My build with the "2011_sp1.8.273" Intel compilers passes the same tests as I detailed below for "2011_sp1.7.256". I don't suspect any longer that the compiler is at fault, but am willing to try additional/alternate tests to help confirm. -Paul On 2/21/2012 5:40 P

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 r25914 DOA

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
hurning away right now (est. 45minutes to complete - should have disabled the Fortan bindings) If there is something other than the -bind-to-* flags I should be using to reach the problematic code, let me know. But based on what I've seen so far, I think we can probably rule out the compiler

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
should be fixed "properly" (whatever that may equate to) for 1.6. The way I see it now, it feels like OMPI is getting a definition of u_char only "by accident". -Paul On 2/21/2012 12:16 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Building the v1.5 branch on Linux with the Solaris Studio

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 r25914 DOA

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
UCCESS; } Anyhow, SOCKET is somehow an unknown layer, so num_sockets is returning 0. I can poke around more, but does someone want to advise? ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Paul H.

[OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
in stdint.h). I had a look at the trunk and VISUALLY is appears the same problem exists in: opal/event/event.h opal/mca/event/libevent2013/libevent/event.h However, my testing is currently confined to the v1.5 branch in the hopes of finally getting the next 1.5.5rc out the door. -Paul --

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable code in examples/Makefile

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
g -o hello_f77 -- Unfortunately, this installation of Open MPI was not compiled with Fortran 90 support. As such, the mpif90 compiler is non-functional. -- -

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable code in examples/Makefile

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ll the write wrapper. So I renamed it to something less problematic. On Feb 21, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: And while we are looking at examples/Makefile on Solaris-10, why are the F77 examples getting built w/ mpif90? Because w/ the Solaris make setting FC also silently sets

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable code in examples/Makefile

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
patch to fix both F77/FC and the "better" ompi_info queries mentioned in my previous post. This REPLACES the patch in the previous post. -Paul On 2/20/2012 11:36 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: The addition on Monday of the Java cases to examples/Makefile has shown that the default "m

[OMPI devel] non-portable code in examples/Makefile

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ble | grep bindings:cxx:yes >/dev/null; then I have *also* tested that approach, and it works fine too. I *did* warn that the introduction of the java bindings would bring collateral damage. I just didn't anticipate encountering it personally. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: trunk build failure on Altix [w/ WORK AROUND]

2012-02-21 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Testing tonight's trunk tarball on the Altix system I have access to looks fine now. Thanks, Brian. -Paul On 2/20/2012 11:49 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Brian, Thanks for looking into this. I'll plan to take a look at the trunk tarball tonight and report back. -Paul On 2/20/20

[OMPI devel] Invalid format strings in ROMIO

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
gridftp_write.c ompi/mca/io/romio/romio/adio/ad_pvfs2/ad_pvfs2_io_dtype.c ompi/mca/io/romio/romio/adio/ad_pvfs2/ad_pvfs2_io_list.c Not sure how much one cares, but I am reporting on the off chance somebody does want to fix this. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.

Re: [OMPI devel] flex warning from flex-2.5.4

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/20/2012 3:36 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: NOTE: I've not yet actually tested the resulting show_help utility [but soon]. An "instrumented" version of test/opal_sos.c is getting the same string back from opal_show_help_string() both with and without my patch. So, I be

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r25966

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
.@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department

Re: [OMPI devel] flex warning from flex-2.5.4

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
turn OPAL_SHOW_HELP_PARSE_TOPIC; } .*\n { BEGIN(INITIAL); } On 2/20/2012 3:26 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: My bad - didn't look closely enough. I'll take a look at it and see if there is anything we can do. On Feb 20, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Ralph, Are you sure this i

Re: [OMPI devel] flex warning from flex-2.5.4

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
done to correct it. On Feb 19, 2012, at 8:47 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I've not checked any other systems, but building the trunk on OpenBSD and FreeBSD (w/ flex-2.5.4) I see the following: LEXshow_help_lex.c "[srcdir]/opal/util/show_help_lex.l", line 65: warning, dan

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r25966

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
cro:). Brian -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable test operator in configure

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
For those keeping score at home, that should have said "/usr/ucb" instead of "/usr/ucb/bin". I make mistakes too (as Ralph's observation of breakage w/ r25966 shows quite clearly). -Paul On 2/20/2012 2:37 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Short version: The "expr: Pa

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable test operator in configure

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
testing. Even using /bin/sh, I saw no other "odd" behaviors with configure on Solaris-10. -Paul On 2/20/2012 1:16 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Argh!! I am now trying to track down "expr: Paren problem" on Solaris. The dash shell on Linux doesn't reproduce this one, un

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable test operator in configure

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Argh!! I am now trying to track down "expr: Paren problem" on Solaris. The dash shell on Linux doesn't reproduce this one, unfortunately. -Paul On 2/20/2012 1:12 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I'll report back ASAP on my slowlaris10 results. -- Paul H. Hargrove

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable test operator in configure

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
slowlaris10 results. NOTE: this is NOT present in the v1.5 branch (no cmr is required). -Paul On 2/20/2012 12:46 PM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: Ah, ok. On Feb 20, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Jeff, The one in config/ompi_load_platform.m4 was on my original hit-list. Getting PAST th

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable test operator in configure

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
and I suspect that is the new problem I am hitting. I hope to know soon. -Paul On 2/20/2012 12:41 PM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: grep == configure | grep test only shows one more. I found it in config/ompi_load_platform.m4 and fixed it on the trunk. On Feb 20, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Paul H. Harg

Re: [OMPI devel] non-portable test operator in configure

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
NFIG_SHELL=dash dash [path_to]/configure [options] -Paul On 2/20/2012 5:42 AM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: Fixed -- thanks! On Feb 20, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Please note that "==" is NOT a portable binary operator for the "test" utility. It is supported on

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: trunk build failure on Altix [w/ WORK AROUND]

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
't. We added yet another macro to handle issues like this, so it was a fairly easy fix. Thanks, Brian On 2/17/12 4:26 PM, "Paul H. Hargrove" wrote: I've poked enough at the ompi configure magic to *think* I understand the source of the problem I've seen

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: [OMPI users] WEXITSTATUS: OpenMPI 1.5.5 RC1 doesn't build on NetBSD (and perhaps other BSDs)

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
evel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

[OMPI devel] non-portable test operator in configure

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
k_alps.m4: AS_IF([test "$orte_check_alps_pmi_happy" == "yes" -a "$orte_without_full_support" = 0], ./config/ompi_load_platform.m4:if test "$with_platform" == "" ; then The $with_platform test breaks configure fairly early on at l

Re: [OMPI devel] trunk build failure on OpenBSD-5.0 [SOLVED/PATCH]

2012-02-20 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
onent fbtl:posix can compile". -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov <mailto:phhargr...@lbl.gov> Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900 --

[OMPI devel] flex warning from flex-2.5.4

2012-02-19 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
and it mentions that the POSIX draft for LEX leaves such cases undefined. http://flex.sourceforge.net/manual/Limitations.html -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Be

Re: [OMPI devel] trunk build failure on Altix [w/ WORK AROUND]

2012-02-17 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
efined reference to `opal_timer_altix_freq' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The configure-generated opal_config.h contains #define MCA_timer_IMPLEMENTATION_HEADER "opal/mca/timer/altix/timer_altix.h" Nothing appears to have been built in BUILDDIR/opal/mca/timer/altix. How

[OMPI devel] excessive warnings on some BSDs [w/ PATCH]

2012-02-17 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
k until 1.6) -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900 --- openmpi-1.7a1r25944/opal/include/opal/types.h~ Fri Feb 17 12:01

[OMPI devel] Solaris/SOS build failure in trunk

2012-02-17 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
enmpi-trunk-solaris10-sparcT2-ss12u2-v9//openmpi-trunk/test/util/opal_sos.c Let me know which bits are needed (config.log, opal_config.h, etc) and I'll gladly send them (but figured the entire list didn't want to see them). -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lb

[OMPI devel] OPAL_ENABLE_FT_CR build broken in 1.5 branch

2012-02-17 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
field "sm_common_mmap" opal_crs_base_cleanup_append(self_sm_module->sm_common_mmap->map_path, false); ^ compilation aborted for /home/pcp1/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-1.5-latest-linux-x86-gm2-icc-8.1//openmpi-1.5-latest/ompi/mca/mpool/sm/mpool_sm_module.c (code 2) -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

[OMPI devel] btl/gm build broken on trunk

2012-02-16 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
^ Usage of btl->error_cb() appears correct on the 1.5 branch (just a visual inspection). -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

[OMPI devel] -fvisibility probe broken [w/ 3-line PATCH]

2012-02-16 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
1.3.2 testing where Jeff and I thought we had this issue fixed. I don't know for sure how I missed re-testing the final cut, but can only guess that I left --disable-visibility in my testing scripts. -Paul "thorough testing is a double-edged sword" Hargrove -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

[OMPI devel] More on OMPI on MacOS 10.4/ppc [WORK AROUND]

2012-02-16 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
As I already discover (see http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/02/10444.php), MacOS 10.4 is NOT listed as a supported platform any longer. So, this message is really just for the archives. From "man ld" on a MacOS 10.4 system (x86 or ppc): MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc1 tested: MacOS/ppc (w/ 1 failure and a "CMR")

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
and 64 bit (x86_64), with gcc and Absoft compilers (*). -Paul On 2/15/2012 7:24 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: As a point for discussion, I am going to offer a simple solution: c) Ignore this for 1.5.5 and raise the minimum MacOS version from 10.4 to 10.5 for ompi 1.6.x and 1.7.x Any stron

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc1 tested: MacOS/ppc (w/ 1 failure and a "CMR")

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
As a point for discussion, I am going to offer a simple solution: c) Ignore this for 1.5.5 and raise the minimum MacOS version from 10.4 to 10.5 for ompi 1.6.x and 1.7.x Any strong opinions? -Paul On 2/15/2012 10:29 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I wanted to note that MacOS 10.4 on *X86* has

Re: [OMPI devel] VT build failure with Clang++

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
wrote: I don't know if it is a Clang bug, but here's my understanding of the problem. [...excellent description removed...] I'm not sure if this is a bug in Clang because I don't know if Clang should have tried to instantiate create(). Dmitri -- Paul H. Hargrove

Re: [OMPI devel] libevent build fails when configured with --disable-hwloc

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ed it to the trunk. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Paul H. Hargrove <mailto:phhargr...@lbl.gov>> wrote: The following 1-line change resolves the problem for me, and I see no potential down-side to it: --- openmpi-1.7a1r25927/opal/mca/event/libevent2013/libevent2013_m

[OMPI devel] opal_path_nfs test failure on NFS4 [w/ PATCH]

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
7m/test/util/opal_path_nfs.c 2012-02-16 01:49:18.882418827 +0100 @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ nfs_tmp[mount_known] = false; if (0 == strcasecmp (fs, "nfs") || +0 == strcasecmp (fs, "nfs4") || 0 == strcasecmp (fs, "lustre") ||

Re: [OMPI devel] libevent build fails when configured with --disable-hwloc

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
2012-02-15 14:11:25.183478598 -0800 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ */ #include "opal_config.h" #include "opal/constants.h" -#include "config.h" +#include "libevent/config.h" #ifdef HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H #include -Paul On 2/15/2012 1:58 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wr

[OMPI devel] libevent build fails when configured with --disable-hwloc

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ca/event/libevent2013/libevent2013_module.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libevent2013_module.o -Paul On 2/15/2012 1:16 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Thanks, Ralph. I am a little deficient in the autotools department. So, I will probably only be able to retest after a new trunk tarball is gener

Re: [OMPI devel] trunk build failed when configured with --disable-hwloc

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
confusion you report, though - just noting that it built. -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc1 tested: MacOS/ppc (w/ 1 failure and a "CMR")

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
previous one failed. However, here it is anyway: $ gcc -fPIC -shared pmpi_test.c -Iinclude -o libpmpi_test.dylib -Llib powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1: unrecognized option '-shared' /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: _MPI_Init _PMPI_Finalize collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -Paul Th

[OMPI devel] More MIPS asm patches

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/14/2012 10:13 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: On the linux/mips64el platform I also tried the PathScale 3.3a compilers on both branches. On both branches the atomic_*_noinline tests all PASS, which validates these patches. On trunk all the tests in test/asm are PASSing. However, the

[OMPI devel] Fixes for MIPS assembly [w/ PATCHES]

2012-02-15 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
The attached patches fix three problems with the non-inline ASM for MIPS (and MIPS64EL): 1) ".set rerorder" was placed too early. This was causing loss of the SLTU instruction in the jump delay slot which follows the return instruction. Since that SLTU is used to set the return value, t

Re: [OMPI devel] trunk build failed when configured with --disable-hwloc

2012-02-14 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/14/2012 5:10 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I have configured the ompi-trunk (from last night's tarball: 1.7a1r25913) with --without-hwloc. Having done so, I see the following failure at build time: CC rmaps_rank_file_component.lo /home/hargrove/OMPI/openmpi-trunk-linux-mip

[OMPI devel] trunk build failed when configured with --disable-hwloc

2012-02-14 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
onfigured out. This is not present in the 1.5 branch configured with identical arguments. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

[OMPI devel] the dangers of configure probing argument counts

2012-02-14 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
rguments to ibv_create_cq], which performs exactly the sort of test I am warning against. So, I would encourage somebody to make the effort to reuse the configure logic Jeff and I developed for hwloc. In particular look for setting and use of HWLOC_STRICT_ARGS_CFLAGS in config/hwloc.m4 -

[OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2r25906 test results

2012-02-12 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
en-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/01/10300.php -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.4.5rc6 released

2012-02-11 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
for -m32 with Ubuntu/Sun compilers - refuse to configure with gccffs - LANL TLCC2 platform files -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add "virbr0" to [btl|oob]_tcp_if_exclude?

2012-02-10 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
That's probably a reflection of the status of the "Open MPI User Documentation" sub-project :-) On 2/10/2012 5:12 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: FWIW: google analytics indicates that the FAQ and the mailing list archives are among the most heavily used sections of the web site.

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add "virbr0" to [btl|oob]_tcp_if_exclude?

2012-02-10 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Much better - at least to the extent that users actually read FAQs :-) -Paul On 2/10/2012 5:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: Check out #220 now; I updated it. -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add "virbr0" to [btl|oob]_tcp_if_exclude?

2012-02-10 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/10/2012 12:21 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Feb 10, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: + User knows nothing about xen, and thus nothing about virbr0 + User has a local-only interface (eth8 in my made up example) + User reads FAQ entry "220. How do I tell Open MPI which TCP net

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add "virbr0" to [btl|oob]_tcp_if_exclude?

2012-02-10 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/10/2012 12:03 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Feb 10, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Since the situation described is one where the user didn't know they could/should disable xen, it is reasonable to think they ALSO don't know they need to exclude virbr0. That&

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add "virbr0" to [btl|oob]_tcp_if_exclude?

2012-02-10 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
to exclude virbr0. So, I read the question as meaning the following: What happens when a user who doesn't know anything about virbr0 does mpirun --mca btl_tcp_if_exclude lo,eth8 And my guess is "nothing good happens". -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove

Re: [OMPI devel] btl/openib: get_ib_dev_distance doesn't see processes as bound if the job has been launched by srun

2012-02-09 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
y more to this than a need for special-casing the singleton? -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc5 has been released

2012-02-08 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/8/2012 11:14 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: On 2/8/2012 3:25 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote: + Building w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 or 12.3 on Linux x86-64, with "-m32" required setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Can the LD_LIBRARY_PATH be substituted with a rpath change in LDFLAGS of the build?

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc5 has been released

2012-02-08 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
tems are set up this way. This appears to be the default on Ubuntu (checked 3 hosts with 2 different releases). -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc5 has been released

2012-02-08 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Add 3 more to the PASS list: linux/x86-64 open64 w/ -m32 openbsd5/amd64 llvm-gcc-2.9 (C and C++, no FORTAN) openbsd5/i386 llvm-gcc-2.9 (C and C++, no FORTAN) -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc5 has been released

2012-02-07 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/7/2012 1:25 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I've SUCCESSFULLY retested 44 out of the 55 cpu/os/compiler/abi combinations currently on my list. I expect 9 more by the end of the day (the older/slower hosts), but two of my test hosts are down. My testing is complete for this rc: + 54

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc5 has been released

2012-02-07 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/7/2012 2:37 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: + "make check" fails atomics tests using GCCFSS-4.0.4 compilers on Solaris10/SPARC Originally reported in: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/01/10234.php This is a matter of the Sun/Oracle fork of GCC (known as GCC

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc5 has been released

2012-02-07 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 2/7/2012 1:25 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: So far I see only two problems that remain: + I can't build w/ the PGI compilers on MacOS Lion. This was previously reported in http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/01/10258.php + Building w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 or 12.3 on

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc5 has been released

2012-02-07 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. This is could either be Oracle's bug in the compiler, or a libtool problem. My report was: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/01/10272.php -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Grou

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Java MPI bindings

2012-02-07 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
7;t argue this point any further. -Paul On 2/7/2012 12:48 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: On Feb 7, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Forgive me if I misunderstand, but I am under the impression that the MPI Forum has not begun any standardization of MPI bindings for JAVA. Have I missed so

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Java MPI bindings

2012-02-07 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
a branch, and an RFC issued. The bindings conform to the MPI standard, and the implementation uses an existing external, third-party binding that has been tested. So I'm not sure what you are asking that hasn't already been done… On Feb 7, 2012, at 1:33 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Java MPI bindings

2012-02-07 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/d

Re: [OMPI devel] ROMIO build broken in 1.5.5rc1 [SOLVED]

2012-01-31 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 1/31/2012 3:43 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Jan 31, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I took a quick look and discovered that all the generated Makefile's under ompi/mca/io/romio/romio contain explicit MAKE=make (twice per Makefile, actually). I haven't gone back to loo

[OMPI devel] ROMIO build broken in 1.5.5rc1 [SOLVED]

2012-01-31 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 1/31/2012 1:53 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I can supply details if anybody want to work on this ahead of 1.5.5rc2, but the short report is: gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/phargrov/OMPI/openmpi-1.5.5rc1-openbsd5-amd64/BLD/ompi/mca/io/romio/romio' Making all in include make: don&#

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc4 is out

2012-01-31 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 1/31/2012 1:42 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Jan 31, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Oops -- Brad was supposed to put that in README, too. Nope, I looked: $ grep -i -e romio -e bsd openmpi-1.4.5rc4/README - Updated ROMIO to the version from MPICH2 1.0.7 Doh. :-\ OK

[OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc4 may still require GNU Make

2012-01-31 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
/software/ompi/v1.4/ The main differences are the 8 issues that Paul Hargrove mentioned: Make v1.4 configure fail on OS X 10.3 and earlier Fix opal/util/path.c for Linux with old compilers README updates for the Sun compilers README updates noting systems that are no longer

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc4 is out

2012-01-31 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 1/31/2012 12:51 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: 2) Must --disable-io-romio on OpenBSD Nobody has yet told me to shutup about that one, so I mention it here for completeness. Having looked only briefly at the failure, I see that it is in

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc4 is out

2012-01-31 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Fix assembly generation code on BSD in v1.4 -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900

[OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc4: opal_path_nfs() ALMOST fixed

2012-01-31 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ld compilers README updates for the Sun compilers README updates noting systems that are no longer supported Fix assembly generation code on BSD in v1.4 -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-23

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc3 released

2012-01-31 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
8) linux/mips64 hangs in either atomic_spinlock or atomic_spinlock_noinline test, depending on compiler and/or machine. On 1/30/2012 7:55 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Oh, I missed a big one: 7) opal/util/path.c has "#elif defined(linux)" but XLC does not define this. This is bre

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc3 released

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Oh, I missed a big one: 7) opal/util/path.c has "#elif defined(linux)" but XLC does not define this. This is breaking test/util/opal_pth_nfs.c See http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/01/10268.php -Paul On 1/30/2012 4:25 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: In retesting I se

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc3 released

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
2 in the description of the group argument to MPI_COMM_CREATE. Fixes #2844: ensure to take the value of --with(out)-memory-manager into account when configuring the components of the faramework. If --without-memory-manager was given, then we really don't want any memory managers to be use

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc3 released

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
ry-manager into account when configuring the components of the faramework. If --without-memory-manager was given, then we really don't want any memory managers to be used. NEWS and README updated -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC

[OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc2 opal_path_nfs failure follow-up

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 1/29/2012 9:28 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: [snip] I also had to disable the opal_path_nfs test again on the POWER6 machine, even w/ the linux->__linux__ change. I will report on that when/if I can determine the cause. -Paul Following up on the opal_path_nfs test failures I repor

[OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc2 linux/ppc/xlc-{7,8,9} [3 PASS, 3 FAIL]

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
While I previously reported success with xlc-11.1 on Linux for both ppc32 and ppc64 ABIs, I find that all is not perfect with earlier compilers. SUMMARY: xlc-9.0 / xlf-11.1 PASS on ILP32 ABI FAIL on LP64 ABI (details below) xlc-8.0 / xlf-10.1 PASS on ILP32 ABI PASS on

[OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc2 testing: Open64 and PathScale

2012-01-27 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Paul On 1/19/2012 9:55 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: Please test: http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.4/ -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National La

  1   2   3   >