I'll throw in one point: fortran is an optional install on Linux, too. :-)
This is a complex issue, and I'm thinking that the email thread has reached the
limit of its usefulness. How about discussing in person at the meeting in a
little over a week? I'll add it to the agenda.
On May 22,
On May 22, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> Let me jump in here with a different perspective.
> First, for those who don't know me:
> + I am NOT an OMPI developer
> + I am NOT an MPI application author either
> + I am a developer of "competing" HPC
Let me jump in here with a different perspective.
First, for those who don't know me:
+ I am NOT an OMPI developer
+ I am NOT an MPI application author either
+ I am a developer of "competing" HPC communications software (GASNet)
+ I contribute to OMPI mainly by building release candidates
fwiw: macports is at py3.3
On May 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Good question. All the pythons I see are 2.x (OSX, RHEL).
>
>
> On May 22, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
>
>> Is this Python 2.x or 3.x? I ask because
On 5/22/13 9:35 AM, "Ralph Castain" wrote:
>* this isn't about Craig and his abilities - this is a more general
>requirements discussion. I personally wouldn't change my comments if it
>was Jeff or Brian making the request - the issue remains the same.
>Introducing another
Good question. All the pythons I see are 2.x (OSX, RHEL).
On May 22, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
> Is this Python 2.x or 3.x? I ask because they are not 100% compatible due to
> changes in the language syntax. Meaning not all 2.x compilant Python programs
>
Is this Python 2.x or 3.x? I ask because they are not 100% compatible due
to changes in the language syntax. Meaning not all 2.x compilant Python
programs work with a 3.x interpreter. IIRC there is a way to write a 2.x
compliant Python program so that it is also 3.x compliant, but my Python
On 5/22/13 6:50 AM, "Ralph Castain" wrote:
>
>On May 22, 2013, at 6:37 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"
> wrote:
>
>> On May 22, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>
>>> I have no issues other than wondering why we don't do it in perl