Related to this conversation, I am proposing that we as a community try to
cultivate some public tests. See the following link for the start of the
dicussion.
https://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/05/18997.php
We won't be able to open up the ompi-tests repo to the public. But we mi
On 18/05/16 09:59, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> the (main) reason is none of us are lawyers and none of us know whether
> all test suites can be redistributed for general public use or not.
Thanks Gilles,
All the best,
Chris
--
Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator
VLSCI - Vi
Samuel,
the (main) reason is none of us are lawyers and none of us know whether
all test suites can be redistributed for general public use or not.
if someone has any interest in the test suites, he/she is free to make a
request for access grant.
Cheers,
Gilles
On 5/18/2016 8:46 AM, C
On 12/05/16 06:21, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> We basically have one important private repo (the tests repo).
Possibly a dumb question (sorry), but what's the reason for that repo
being private?
I ask as someone on the Beowulf list today was looking for an MPI
regression test tool and found
FYI -- Github announced changes to their pricing plans today
(https://github.com/blog/2164-introducing-unlimited-private-repositories).
They have a new "per user" pricing model, which makes sense for some
organizations.
It does *not* make sense for us -- we are paying $300/year (i.e., $25/mo)
