Re: [OMPI devel] Intel C (icc) 11.0.083 compile problem

2009-06-18 Thread David Robertson
Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Jeff Squyres wrote: [snip] Erm -- that's weird. So when you extract the tarballs, atomic-amd64-linux.s is non-empty (as it should be), but after a failed build, it's file length 0? Notice that during the build process, we sym link atomic-amd64-linux.s to atomic-asm.S

Re: [OMPI devel] Intel C (icc) 11.0.083 compile problem

2009-06-17 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Jeff Squyres wrote: [snip] Erm -- that's weird. So when you extract the tarballs, atomic-amd64-linux.s is non-empty (as it should be), but after a failed build, it's file length 0? Notice that during the build process, we sym link atomic-amd64-linux.s to atomic-asm.S (I see that happening in

Re: [OMPI devel] Intel C (icc) 11.0.083 compile problem

2009-06-17 Thread Jeff Squyres
I am trying to build Open MPI 1.3.2 with ifort 11.0.074 and icc/icpc 11.0.083 (the Intel compilers) on a quad-core AMD Opteron workstation running CentOS 4.4. I have no problems on this same machine if I use ifort with gcc/g++ instead of icc/icpc. Configure seems to work ok even though icc and

[OMPI devel] Intel C (icc) 11.0.083 compile problem

2009-06-17 Thread David Robertson
Hello, I am trying to build Open MPI 1.3.2 with ifort 11.0.074 and icc/icpc 11.0.083 (the Intel compilers) on a quad-core AMD Opteron workstation running CentOS 4.4. I have no problems on this same machine if I use ifort with gcc/g++ instead of icc/icpc. Configure seems to work ok even though