Re: [OMPI devel] ORTE process name,, nodeid..

2007-11-22 Thread Shipman, Galen M.
I really don't have the background to discuss ORTE architectural decisions I will leave this to others. What I need is the following: The ability to support Shared Memory on CNL. This requires knowing if a proc is local and a mechanism to solve the SM init race condition. Here are the constrain

Re: [OMPI devel] ORTE process name,, nodeid..

2007-11-19 Thread Ralph Castain
On 11/19/07 6:20 PM, "Tim Prins" wrote: > On Monday 19 November 2007 09:42:21 am Ralph H Castain wrote: > >> An alternative solution might be to incorporate the modex in the new OMPI >> framework I was about to create anyway. This framework was intended to deal >> with publish/lookup of OMPI

Re: [OMPI devel] ORTE process name,, nodeid..

2007-11-19 Thread Tim Prins
On Monday 19 November 2007 09:42:21 am Ralph H Castain wrote: > An alternative solution might be to incorporate the modex in the new OMPI > framework I was about to create anyway. This framework was intended to deal > with publish/lookup of OMPI data to support a variety of methods. > Originally,

Re: [OMPI devel] ORTE process name,, nodeid..

2007-11-19 Thread Ralph H Castain
Yo Galen I'm not aware of any continuing discussion to totally remove the process name from ORTE - I believe we coalesced to redefining how the jobid was established to a procedure that doesn't require a name server. This hasn't come over to the trunk yet, but will in the next couple of months. A