Re: [OMPI devel] Question about opal/mca/memory/linux licensing

On Feb 14, 2012, at 6:47 AM, Denis Nagorny wrote: > It seems that I was misled by copyright notices in source files which have no > such exclusion. BTW Are you going to make copyright notices in source files > more consistent with such one in README file? We tried to make as few edits to

Re: [OMPI devel] Question about opal/mca/memory/linux licensing

2012/2/14 Jeff Squyres > On Feb 14, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Denis Nagorny wrote: > > I assume you're referring to the ptmalloc implementation under > opal/mca/memory/linux, right? > Yes, you are right. > Specifically, see opal/mca/memory/linux/README-ptmalloc.txt > It seems that

Re: [OMPI devel] Question about opal/mca/memory/linux licensing

On Feb 14, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Denis Nagorny wrote: > Investigating memory management implementation in OpenMPI I found that opal's > memory module licensed under Lesser GPL terms. I assume you're referring to the ptmalloc implementation under opal/mca/memory/linux, right? If, so, please read

[OMPI devel] Question about opal/mca/memory/linux licensing

Hello, Investigating memory management implementation in OpenMPI I found that opal's memory module licensed under Lesser GPL terms. This subsystem is linked into openMPI library. As far as I know this fact should enforce Lesser GPL license on libopen-rte.so and libopen-pal.so. Could anybody