Re: [OMPI devel] Shared library version numbers for 1.8.2

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Dubman
confirmed. Thanks On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > Bert: good catch, thanks > > Mellanox: can you confirm that this change was required? > > Sent from my phone. No type good. > > > On Jul 9, 2014, at 4:59 PM, "Ralph Castain"

Re: [OMPI devel] Shared library version numbers for 1.8.2

2014-07-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Bert: good catch, thanks Mellanox: can you confirm that this change was required? Sent from my phone. No type good. > On Jul 9, 2014, at 4:59 PM, "Ralph Castain" wrote: > > Ouch - yes, we definitely should roll it to 4:0:0. I gather the ABI change > was required to comply

Re: [OMPI devel] Shared library version numbers for 1.8.2

2014-07-09 Thread Ralph Castain
Ouch - yes, we definitely should roll it to 4:0:0. I gather the ABI change was required to comply with the spec. I normally would refuse to allow an ABI change during a stable release series, but have given more latitude to OSHMEM due to its relatively new inclusion and the need to get it into

Re: [OMPI devel] Shared library version numbers for 1.8.2

2014-07-09 Thread Bert Wesarg
Quoting "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" : Here's what I think VERSION should be for 1.8.2: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/32165 I left comments in the VERSION file as to why I think each version number should change. Can someone please verify that this work

[OMPI devel] Shared library version numbers for 1.8.2

2014-07-08 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Here's what I think VERSION should be for 1.8.2: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/32165 I left comments in the VERSION file as to why I think each version number should change. Can someone please verify that this work is correct? If so, we can remove the comments (before the