Hi all,
We use both the PGI and Intel compilers over an Infiniband cluster and I
was trying to find a way to have both orteruns in the path (in separate
directories) at the same time. I decided to use the --program-suffix
option. However, all the symlinks in the resulting bin directory point
- "David Robertson" wrote:
> Hi all,
Hiya,
> We use both the PGI and Intel compilers over an
> Infiniband cluster and I was trying to find a way
> to have both orteruns in the path (in separate
> directories) at the same time.
Not a solution, but what we do here is to arrange our
installs
On Sep 3, 2009, at 9:55 PM, David Robertson wrote:
We use both the PGI and Intel compilers over an Infiniband cluster
and I
was trying to find a way to have both orteruns in the path (in
separate
directories) at the same time. I decided to use the --program-suffix
option. However, all the sy
Perhaps it should be taken out of the help message in the configure
script then.
Dave
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Sep 3, 2009, at 9:55 PM, David Robertson wrote:
We use both the PGI and Intel compilers over an Infiniband cluster and I
was trying to find a way to have both orteruns in the path (in
On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:13 AM, David Robertson wrote:
Perhaps it should be taken out of the help message in the configure
script then.
We can't; it's part of the built-in Autoconf options. :-(
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:13 AM, David Robertson wrote:
Perhaps it should be taken out of the help message in the configure
script then.
We can't; it's part of the built-in Autoconf options. :-(
On can't disable the option, but one can prevent confusing the user by
(partially)
Excellent suggestion; thanks Paul!
I've incorporated this into OMPI -- Paul, can you confirm that I
obeyed the license requirements properly?
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/21943
On Sep 4, 2009, at 9:01 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2009, at 7
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Excellent suggestion; thanks Paul!
You are welcome. My presence on the ompi-devel list isn't totally
passive. :-)
I've incorporated this into OMPI -- Paul, can you confirm that I
obeyed the license requirements properly?
IANAL, but looks all proper to me.
May I sug
Good call; done. Thanks!
On Sep 5, 2009, at 5:01 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Excellent suggestion; thanks Paul!
You are welcome. My presence on the ompi-devel list isn't totally
passive. :-)
>
> I've incorporated this into OMPI -- Paul, can you confirm that I
> obeyed
