On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:21 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I agree - I sent the note because I see people doing things a bit differently
> than expected. I have no issue with PRs for things where people want extra
> eyes on something before committing, or as part of an RFC. Just want to
> ensure folks
I agree - I sent the note because I see people doing things a bit differently
than expected. I have no issue with PRs for things where people want extra eyes
on something before committing, or as part of an RFC. Just want to ensure folks
aren’t letting them languish expecting some kind of gateke
HI Ralph,
We should discuss this on Tuesday. I thought we'd decided for master to
use a model where developers would directly push to ompi/master.
I'd be willing to pull the request from Giles marked as bugs tomorrow.
Howard
2014-11-06 13:16 GMT-07:00 Ralph Castain :
> Hey folks
>
> We seem t
I have 2, namely #228 (Fix --with-fortran=... logic) and #232 (RFC/weak symbols
status ignore).
I will look at them eventually, there just haven't been enough hours in the day
yet, especially with SC coming up. :-(
On Nov 6, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hey folks
>
> We seem to
