Re: [OMPI devel] contributing to Open MPI

2016-06-02 Thread Nathan Hjelm
The branch will be merged once we know make check succeeds on arm64 with —disable-builtin-atomics. Just waiting on that testing. -Nathan > On Jun 1, 2016, at 10:22 PM, Sreenidhi Bharathkar Ramesh > wrote: > > Thank you for the response. > > Nathan, > Sure, we will try out your branch and let

Re: [OMPI devel] contributing to Open MPI

2016-06-02 Thread Sreenidhi Bharathkar Ramesh
Thank you for the response. Nathan, Sure, we will try out your branch and let you know. Any idea when it is likely to be pulled into master ? I presume that our changes, if any, will need to be on top of these changes. Jeff, A few clarifications please: > a) run MTT regularly and submit the re

Re: [OMPI devel] contributing to Open MPI

2016-05-31 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Let me address the questions Nathan didn't: - testing: if you're adding support for a platform that we don't test, it's likely that the code will grow stale and eventually be removed. The best way to make sure a platform stays supported is to a) run MTT regularly and submit the results to the

Re: [OMPI devel] contributing to Open MPI

2016-05-30 Thread Nathan Hjelm
I should clarify. The PR adds support for ARM64 atomics and CMA when the linux headers are not installed. It does not update the timer code and still needs some testing. -Nathan > On May 30, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > > We already have a PR open to add ARM64 support. Please test

Re: [OMPI devel] contributing to Open MPI

2016-05-30 Thread Nathan Hjelm
We already have a PR open to add ARM64 support. Please test https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/1634 and let me know if it works for you. Additional contributions are greatly appreciated! -Nathan > On May 30, 2016, at 4:32 AM, Sreenidhi Bharathkar Ramesh > wrote: > > Hello, > > We may be