Re: [OMPI devel] iWARP development

2013-12-12 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:31 PM, "Prindeville, Philip" wrote: > I think I understand. > > I’ll pull a copy of trunk and dig around in there. > > Is there a reason that the code can’t be gated by conditional compilation > flags or detect the environment at run-time? I'm not sure what you're ask

Re: [OMPI devel] iWARP development

2013-12-12 Thread Ralph Castain
rom:* devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] *On Behalf Of *Ralph > Castain > *Sent:* Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:41 AM > *To:* Open MPI Developers > > *Subject:* Re: [OMPI devel] iWARP development > > > > Be aware that we removed SCTP from the 1.7 release series beca

Re: [OMPI devel] iWARP development

2013-12-12 Thread Prindeville, Philip
nce of the SCTP code that's in trunk? Thanks, -Philip From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:41 AM To: Open MPI Developers Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] iWARP development Be aware that we removed SCTP from the 1.7 release s

Re: [OMPI devel] iWARP development

2013-12-12 Thread Ralph Castain
Be aware that we removed SCTP from the 1.7 release series because of its unknown state of repair - I don't believe anyone has tested it in quite some time, and nobody has been maintaining it so far as we know. Not saying it won't work - just saying that I don't think we know :-/ On Wed, Dec 11,

Re: [OMPI devel] iWARP development

2013-12-11 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Dec 11, 2013, at 5:33 PM, "Prindeville, Philip" wrote: > I was wondering what the current state of iWARP development is. Open MPI's iWARP support is part of the "openib" BTL (so named because OpenFabrics used to be known as OpenIB, before iWARP joined, and we never changed the name of ou

Re: [OMPI devel] iWARP development

2013-12-11 Thread George Bosilca
Don’t look in the 1.7.3 for SCTP. Instead, take a look at the trunk where we still have the SCTP BTL (ompi/mca/btl/sctp). George. On Dec 11, 2013, at 17:33 , Prindeville, Philip wrote: > Hi. > > I was wondering what the current state of iWARP development is. There are > some features w