Hello All,
This may not be something relates to the forum, so sorry for asking this
first of all :). Currently I have been working on an implementation of
parallel Quicksort using MPI and now I need some standard parallel Quicksort
implementation(s) for a performance evaluation. So can someone reco
Thanks! A few questions about this patch:
-Source: openmpi-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
+Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
Does this mean that you're looking for a different tarball name? I'm
not sure that's good; the tarball should be an openmpi tarball,
regardless of what name it ge
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for reviewing my changes !
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote:
-Source: openmpi-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
+Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
Does this mean that you're looking for a different tarball name? I'm not
sure that's good; the tarball should be an openmp
On Aug 6, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote:
> -Source: openmpi-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
> +Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
>
> Does this mean that you're looking for a different tarball name?
I'm not
> sure that's good; the tarball should be an openmpi tarball,
regardless
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> -Source: openmpi-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
> +Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
The spec file parser defines some of these variables by default. F.e.
after encountering at the top of the file:
Name: fftw
Version: 2.1.5
Release: 5.bc
somet
Is it time to "svn rm ompi/mca/pml/dr"?
On Aug 4, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Rolf/Mouhamed
Could you get together off-list to discuss the different approaches
and see if/where there is common ground. It would be nice to see an
integrated solution - personally, I would rather not s
Ok, with Terry's help, I found a segv in the coll sm. If you run
without the sm btl, there's an obvious bad parameter that we're
passing that results in a segv.
LANL -- can you confirm / deny that these are the segv's that you were
seeing?
While fixing this, I noticed that the sm btl and
On Aug 6, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
I'm therefore going to change the mpool string names that btl/sm and
coll/sm are looking for so that they get unique sm mpool modules.
(another case of "I knew what I meant, but that's not what I typed")
I'm going to [try to] change
