Re: [OMPI devel] Deadlocks with new (routed) orted launch algorithm

2009-11-30 Thread Sylvain Jeaugey
Hi Ralph, I'm also puzzled :-) Here is what I did today : * download the latest nightly build (openmpi-1.7a1r22241) * untar it * patch it with my "ORTE_RELAY_DELAY" patch * build it directly on the cluster (running FC11) with : ./configure --platform=contrib/platform/lanl/tlcc/debug-nopana

Re: [OMPI devel] Deadlocks with new (routed) orted launch algorithm

2009-11-30 Thread Ralph Castain
Interesting. The only difference I see is the FC11 - I haven't seen anyone running on that OS yet. I wonder if that is the source of the trouble? Do we know that our code works on that one? I know we had problems in the past with FC9, for example, that required fixes. Also, what compiler are yo

Re: [OMPI devel] Deadlocks with new (routed) orted launch algorithm

2009-11-30 Thread Sylvain Jeaugey
Ok. Maybe I should try on a RHEL5 then. About the compilers, I've tried with both gcc and intel and it doesn't seem to make a difference. On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Ralph Castain wrote: Interesting. The only difference I see is the FC11 - I haven't seen anyone running on that OS yet. I wonder if t

Re: [OMPI devel] Deadlocks with new (routed) orted launch algorithm

2009-11-30 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote: About my previous e-mail, I was wrong about all components having a 0 priority : it was based on default parameters reported by "ompi_info -a | grep routed". It seems that the truth is not always in ompi_info ... ompi_info *does* always