On 09-May-12 7:26 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On May 9, 2012, at 11:33 AM, wrote:
>
>> Well, looking at the libverbs sources, it seems that there is a patch for
>> devinfo (cf below).
>>
>> Thus, the correct speeds, according to the libibverbs patch. And, if I
>> understand well, they must be
>>
On 10-May-12 3:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>
> Here are the ActiveSpeed values:
>
> 1: SDR - 2.5 Gb/s * (8/10 coding)
> 2: DDR - 5 Gb/s * (8/10 coding)
> 4: QDR - 10 Gb/s * (8/10 coding)
> 8: FDR10 - 10 Gb/s * (64/66 coding)
> 16: FDR - 14 Gbps * (64/66 coding)
> 32: EDR
Looks ok to me.
FWIW, I'd put EDR in, if you know the values (even though there won't be any
hardware for a while). That'll just give this code a longer shelf life /
future-proof-ness...
On May 10, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> On 10-May-12 3:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>>
On 10-May-12 4:01 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Looks ok to me.
>
> FWIW, I'd put EDR in, if you know the values (even though there won't be any
> hardware for a while). That'll just give this code a longer shelf life /
> future-proof-ness...
Great, I'll add EDR too.
There's actually a patch pendi
On May 10, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Great, I'll add EDR too.
Cool. File a CMR, too.
> There's actually a patch pending to be accepted in kernel
> that adds enums instead of all these values. But for now
> we only have these numbers.
...I smell some configury in your future.
Usual location:
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.6/
The only change since rc3 was a better FDR10/FDR/EDR patch in the openib BTL:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/26425
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/w
