Is there anything written up about recent Open MPI one-sided work? Looking for
something beyond just the code that I can study up on.. papers, design docs,
future plans, etc.
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff
> Squyres (jsqu
We're just starting this morning. We've joined a running webex if anyone feels
like joining. Here's what we'll be talking about this morning:
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/Meeting-2015-01#topics-still-to-discuss
The MTL discussion will be at 1pm US Central today. It'll *probably* be t
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Friedley, Andrew
> wrote:
>
> Is there anything written up about recent Open MPI one-sided work? Looking
> for something beyond just the code that I can study up on.. papers, design
> docs, future plans, etc.
Doubtful.
I think the main intent for the original
Sigh. That's the wiki link, not the webex link. :-)
Here's the webex link for this morning:
https://cisco.webex.com/cisco/e.php?MTID=m5da65867500cfd51e7a1ed895b2e2a8d
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> We're just starting this morning. We've joined a runni
If you didn't join us already, the webex link for the MTL discussion is the
same as the webex link earlier this morning:
> https://cisco.webex.com/cisco/e.php?MTID=m5da65867500cfd51e7a1ed895b2e2a8d
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> Sigh. That's the wiki
Thank you all who traveled and/or showed up on a webex this week for the OMPI
developer's meeting. We discussed a zillion things and made much forward
progress. The wiki with a summary of discussed/decided things is here:
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/Meeting-2015-01
The major age
Thanks to all of you who joined the webex for the discussion.
Short version of the results:
- PSM and OFI MTL maintainers said that they will look into "promoting"
themselves to be a PML. They didn't think it would be too hard (but aren't
promising anything yet).
- Portals MTL maintainers sai
WHAT: Remove the embedded libtdl from the OPAL source tree
WHY: Fixes #311
WHERE: Various configury and .c files in the code base (see
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/366)
TIMEOUT: Let's discuss next Tuesday during the Dallas meeting roundup/sumary
MORE DETAIL:
We've known for a while t
Jeff,
If I understand one is (or will be soon) expected to have libtool-dev(el)
installed on the build system, even if one is not a OMPI developer.
How does this plan to cease embedding libltdl align with the fact that
autogen.pl currently applies patches to the parts of the generated
configure f
