Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Public Test Repo

Hi Josh, On 19/05/16 13:54, Josh Hursey wrote: > Let me know what you think. Certainly everything here is open for > discussion, and we will likely need to refine aspects as we go. I think having an open test suite in conjunction with the current private one is a great way to go, I think it send

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Public Test Repo

I was initially for this idea, but now I find myself conflicted. Specifically: what's the value in yet another MPI test suite? Sure, we've got a bunch of tests that no one else has (i.e., the things we've home-grown over the years). Some are great tests. Some will need to be cleaned up and ge

[OMPI devel] Fwd: Errored: open-mpi/ompi#1160 (master - 50b3775)

Travis seems to be broken due to a ethtool issue. George. -- Forwarded message -- From: Travis CI List-Post: devel@lists.open-mpi.org Date: Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM Subject: Errored: open-mpi/ompi#1160 (master - 50b3775) To: bosi...@icl.utk.edu *open-mpi / ompi

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Public Test Repo

I think talking to the MPICH folks about creating a common test pool might be useful. More useful would be to get the MPI Forum to 'bless' it and take input from all of the MPI venders. Maybe you all can talk about that in a sidebar at the MPI Forum - depending on what we figure out here. The MPIC

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: Errored: open-mpi/ompi#1160 (master - 50b3775)

Note this affects OS X only. in opal/util/ethtool.c, ethtool_cmd_speed must not be defined if not HAVE_STRUCT_ETHTOOL_CMD I will not be able to push a fix until tomorrow Cheers, Gilles On Friday, May 20, 2016, George Bosilca wrote: > Travis seems to be broken due to a ethtool issue. > > Ge

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: Errored: open-mpi/ompi#1160 (master - 50b3775)

I have a fix coming shortly; just about to push the PR... > On May 19, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet > wrote: > > Note this affects OS X only. > > in opal/util/ethtool.c, ethtool_cmd_speed must not be defined if not > HAVE_STRUCT_ETHTOOL_CMD > > I will not be able to push a fix unti

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Public Test Repo

Assume that we are able to “package” MTT so it can be upstreamed to the OpenHPC folks (as they have requested). It then becomes a little more “salable” as a generalized testing tool, which means that the tests in our repo could be used by others without having to deal with the MTT-specific harne