Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.9-17-g36da2ff
Start time: Wed Aug 20 21:02:37 EDT 2014
End time: Wed Aug 20 21:03:58 EDT 2014
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc dev-185-ge668fe2
Start time: Wed Aug 20 21:01:01 EDT 2014
End time: Wed Aug 20 21:02:25 EDT 2014
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
I'm aware of the problem, but it will be fixed when the PMIx branch is merged
later this week.
On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:00 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> let's look at the following trivial test program :
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main (int
On Aug 20, 2014, at 11:55 AM, svn-commit-mai...@open-mpi.org wrote:
> Author: rhc (Ralph Castain)
> Date: 2014-08-20 12:55:36 EDT (Wed, 20 Aug 2014)
> New Revision: 32556
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/32556
>
> Log:
> Track down the last piece of the connection problem. It
Can somebody confirm that configure is adding "-c9x" or "-c99" to CFLAGS
with this compiler?
If not then r32555 could possibly be reverted in favor of adding the proper
compiler flag.
Also, I am suspicious of this failure because even without a language-level
option pgcc 12.9 and 13.4 compile the
If that's the case, then I wonder why it doesn't complain in other areas of the
code where we also use C99 syntax? Or is it perhaps "mostly" C99 compliant, but
doesn't like that specific use-case?
On Aug 20, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> Really? That means PGI 2013
Really? That means PGI 2013 is NOT C99 compliant! Figures.
-Nathan
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:48:48PM -0400, svn-commit-mai...@open-mpi.org wrote:
> Author: ggouaillardet (Gilles Gouaillardet)
> Date: 2014-08-19 22:48:47 EDT (Tue, 19 Aug 2014)
> New Revision: 32555
> URL:
Folks,
let's look at the following trivial test program :
#include
#include
int main (int argc, char * argv[]) {
int rank, size;
MPI_Init(, );
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, );
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, );
printf ("I am %d/%d and i abort\n", rank, size);