On 27-08-18 23:47, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 20:39:37 +0200
Achim Gratz via devel wrote:
if anybody has any
concrete questions I'll relay them when I get back.
I was also out, and now back.
We probably need to work with linuxpps, but we may have an easier time
work
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:17:06 -0400
MLewis via devel wrote:
> You don't need a precise
> Pi interrupt, you don't even need any Pi interrupt. The precision is
> in obtaining the kernel timestamp and the timemark.
No need to keep repeating what we already agree on. Time to move onto
wh
Gary,
On 27/08/2018 10:58 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 22:07:55 -0400
MLewis via devel wrote:
"Strictly speaking, the PPS pulse isn�t even necessary for this
process. One could simply generate a pulse on the external interrupt
line once per second at
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 22:07:55 -0400
MLewis via devel wrote:
> >> The thesis confirmed what I suspected, that the best results are
> >> from a kernel timestamp of the outgoing trigger that has the ublox
> >> generate its Timemark timestamp.
> > Yes, thus the need for the PPS timestamp
Gary,
On 27/08/2018 8:56 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:07:52 -0400
MLewis via devel wrote:
Gary,
On 27/08/2018 6:38 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:24:01 -0400
MLewis via devel wrote:
The key thing I, and othe
> Are you seeing these same warnings on NetBSD 7?
No, NetBSD 7 had been clean.
>> ../../ntpd/ntp_control.c:2628:8: warning: format '%u' expects argument of
>> type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
> I filed https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/issues/496 a week ago for th
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 05:20:45PM -0700, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
>
> What's the story?
>
> I'm catching up after being off line for several weeks. I updated a NetBSD
> box to 8.0 and now it produces lots and lots of warnings that I expect would
> get fixed before a release.
I brought up
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:07:52 -0400
MLewis via devel wrote:
> Gary,
>
> On 27/08/2018 6:38 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> > Yo MLewis!
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:24:01 -0400
> > MLewis via devel wrote:
> >
> > The key thing I, and others, want from the Lukas patch is the
>
What's the story?
I'm catching up after being off line for several weeks. I updated a NetBSD
box to 8.0 and now it produces lots and lots of warnings that I expect would
get fixed before a release.
Most are complaining about %m. Sample:
../../libntp/msyslog.c:512:5: warning: %m is only al
Gary,
On 27/08/2018 6:38 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:24:01 -0400
MLewis via devel wrote:
The key thing I, and others, want from the Lukas patch is the
PPS out when the kernel detects the PPS. Without out, nothing much
else matters.
The PPS becomes
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:24:01 -0400
MLewis via devel wrote:
> Not me. I looked at it and having it as a patch didn't make sense to
> me.
I hope someone picks it up, my TODO list already long.
> So I'm developing a LKM to trigger Timemarks with timespec timestamps
> and sequence numb
On 27/08/2018 5:47 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
Yo Achim!
Has anyone applied the patch and checked it out?
RGDS
GARY
Gary,
Not me. I looked at it and having it as a patch didn't make sense to me.
So I'm developing a LKM to trigger Timemarks with timespec timestamps
and sequence num
Yo Achim!
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 20:39:37 +0200
Achim Gratz via devel wrote:
> if anybody has any
> concrete questions I'll relay them when I get back.
I was also out, and now back.
We probably need to work with linuxpps, but we may have an easier time
working with the folks that maintain the Ras
13 matches
Mail list logo
