Yo Hal!
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 14:16:46 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > I see no 'export' in your example.
>
> sh-4.4$ export foo=3
> sh-4.4$ echo $foo
> 3
> sh-4.4$ (foo=4; echo $foo)
> 4
> sh-4.4$ echo $foo
> 3
> sh-4.4$
Now I see export, but not the test I wanted:
$ export foo=3
$ (export foo=
> I see no 'export' in your example.
sh-4.4$ export foo=3
sh-4.4$ echo $foo
3
sh-4.4$ (foo=4; echo $foo)
4
sh-4.4$ echo $foo
3
sh-4.4$
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/
Yo Hal!
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:56:39 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > Maybe: export FOO=xx ??
>
> I tried it. It goes in, but the old value gets restored after the )
> We need a shell wizard.
>
> sh-4.4$ foo=3
> sh-4.4$ (echo $foo)
> 3
> sh-4.4$ (foo=4; echo $foo)
> 4
> sh-4.4$ echo $foo
> 3
> s
> Maybe: export FOO=xx ??
I tried it. It goes in, but the old value gets restored after the )
We need a shell wizard.
sh-4.4$ foo=3
sh-4.4$ (echo $foo)
3
sh-4.4$ (foo=4; echo $foo)
4
sh-4.4$ echo $foo
3
sh-4.4$
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
__
Yo Hal!
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:36:46 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> >> Can we do what we need with ()s?
>
> > I have no idea. I have not used anything but bash for decades. But
> > it looks promising. If you can test then you or I can change the
> > code.
>
> I tried it. FOO=xx inside () ge
>> Can we do what we need with ()s?
> I have no idea. I have not used anything but bash for decades. But
> it looks promising. If you can test then you or I can change the code.
I tried it. FOO=xx inside () gets dropped after the )
Maybe we can make a function that returns what we want, but
Yo Hal!
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 12:47:47 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > ./waf configure --out=$DIR $2 2>&1 | tee$DIR/test.log
> > The scripts run something (./waf configure in this case), and put
> > the output into a pipe to log it.
>
> > Then next, there is a need to see if any part of the p
> ./waf configure --out=$DIR $2 2>&1 | tee$DIR/test.log
> The scripts run something (./waf configure in this case), and put the output
> into a pipe to log it.
> Then next, there is a need to see if any part of the pipeling failed. But /
> bin/sh on *BSD only reports if the last part of t
Yo Hal!
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 21:53:30 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Context is de-bashing tests/option-tester.sh and
> tests/python3-tester.sh
Ouch. That is supposed to be the way to de-bash on *BSD.
> FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Nov 14 06:12:40 UTC 2017
>
> /bin/sh
> $ se
