)
If that is not the issue, I will be glad to take a real look at this in
running code.
Regards,
Clark B. Wierda
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ring to call the lookup
with the name provided by the server directive. The only real difference
between a specified server and a pool server is that you don't delete the
specified server.
I'm definitely not looking to bang on DNS servers any more than I have to.
Clark B. Wierda
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
>
> Since you opened the door...
>
> > |shm| T | Shared Memory Driver
> > |gpsd | T | GPSD NG client protocol
>
> I think that leads to confusion since they both, at least for now,
> come from gpsd.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> The new refclock directive is implemented and documented. This has
> had some large consequences.
>
>
Great!
I'll echo Hal on the desirability to be less specific when we can.
I think we should try to have the
. There should be no impact on
the time calculations after an association is provisioned.
Clark B. Wierda
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote:
>
> Possible crazy idea...
>
> How about we never kill the DNS helper thread. Just let it s
e. I can use the
created logs.
Once I have some data, I can figure out a good way to display it and
iterate from there.
Regards,
Clark B. Wierda
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Previous attempt to devel@ntpsec.org bounced, but everything looks good now.
I apologize to those that already received this.
Clark B. Wierda
-- Forwarded message --
From: Clark B. Wierda <cbwie...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [gpsd-dev]
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> Current inventory, for those interested. Machines are named after elements
> because two letters is all that will fit on the stickers that will fit on
> my micro-SD cards.
>
> ar - Pi 3, soon to be mated to an
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
> [pool limit of 100 ms]
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > That's weird. Why would they have a precision requirement *above*
> RFC5905's
> > "A few tens of milliseconds"? You'd think they'd want it to be below
> that.
>
>
for the NTP Pool Project and they have very
soft precision targets (>100ms). I was thinking that just about any USB GPS
puck should be able to deliver this. This would simplify the process for
many users.
Clark B. Wierda
___
devel mailing list
de
ockets. Chronyd
>> uses sockets as an optional alternative to SHM. This is more flexible,
>> more secure, and allows the consumer to wait for data instead of
>> polling. Any process that can write to SHM can smash the clock. It
>> does make things like ntpshmmon impossible
he case used for the cluster I was showing at Penguicon.
Clark B Wierda
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
t should just work. The GPS Hat will also provide an RTC for
both the ODroid and the RPi.
Regards,
Clark B. Wierda
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
.
I have an Adafruit Ultimate GPS Breakout coming that I intend to try on the
BBB. I have a few GPS devices of the handheld and mouse USB variety that I
intend to try as well.
Cheers,
Clark B Wierda
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lis
14 matches
Mail list logo