Hi!
Can anybody explain me loose_route() behavior in situation described here:
http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2007-March/010055.html
Thanks!
--
CU,
Victor Gamov
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
That works for us.
-Aron
SightSpeed Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:14 AM
To: Aron Rosenberg
Cc: devel@openser.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] Multiple IP's and UDP children
I was rather thinking to keep the current m
I was rather thinking to keep the current meaning of "children" (number
of children per interface) and to have the ability to specify a number
of children when you define an interface - if a specific number is
forced, the default "children" will be ignored.
Ex:
children=5
listen=udp:ip1:port
Patches item #1693779, was opened at 2007-04-03 17:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1693779&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full co
The ideal for us would be that "children" is the total number rather
than a per IP:Port number.
-Aron
SightSpeed Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:59 AM
To: Aron Rosenberg
Cc: devel@openser.org
Subject: Re: [Devel]
Hi Aron,
no, at the moment there is no way to do that, but I guess it will be
something very useful to have - I will keep it in mind
regards,
bogdan
Aron Rosenberg wrote:
Is there any way to set the number of children as a total value
instead of per IP:Port value? Our server listens on
Hi Jerome,
here are some technical details on the issue, in order to bring some light.
most probably your question was about what;s behind the "timer detached"
warning, right? if so, there are two situation when it can happen :
1) due a race condition on timer ops between "timeout" and "inse
Is there any way to set the number of children as a total value instead
of per IP:Port value? Our server listens on two IP:port combos, and the
traffic is split 90/10. However we have a huge number of wasted children
(and DB connections) since "children" is duplicated for every IP:Port
pair?
-A
Hi Ovidiu,
well, that will be nice :), but let us take on step at at time - first
will be to have the ability to use multiple sets of rtpproxies. Second
will be provisioning them.
regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
The proposed solution would work great. Since the nathelper mod
Hi Bogdan,
The proposed solution would work great. Since the nathelper module
already has LB support built in (there is support to reconnect to an
rtpproxy), it would be interesting to load the set of rtpproxy from
the database. Like this, we would be able to add/remove rtpproxy
servers on the
Revision: 1950
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1950&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2007-04-03 07:14:37 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
backport from devel (a less agressive fix):
-fixed too loose condition - it resulted in un-needed timer ops.
Revision: 1949
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1949&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2007-04-03 07:14:07 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
backport from devel (a less agressive fix):
-fixed too loose condition - it resulted in un-needed timer ops.
Revision: 1948
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1948&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2007-04-03 07:13:11 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
-fixed too loose condition - it resulted in un-needed timer ops.
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/m
Revision: 1947
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1947&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2007-04-03 07:02:05 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
backport from devel:
- fixed bug in re-triggering the DELETE timer; be sure and reset the timer
link struc
Revision: 1946
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1946&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2007-04-03 07:01:27 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
backport from devel:
- fixed bug in re-triggering the DELETE timer; be sure and reset the timer
link struc
Revision: 1945
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1945&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2007-04-03 07:00:09 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
- fixed bug in re-triggering the DELETE timer; be sure and reset the timer
link structure before re-trigg
I will be there :-)
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 4/3/07, Henning Westerholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 02 April 2007 17:14, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello Henning,
>
> might be good idea. Let's try to organize it after the Easter holidays.
> We need more people to be enthusiastic
Hello all,
i'm working currently towards the abstraction of the database connectivity in
usrloc, to use an enhanced db interface for user data storage that were using
internally.
The dlist::register_udomain() function test on every new domain the database
connectivity with a db init and some q
Hi Ovidiu, Hi Daryl,
this functionality was discussed for a long time and I agree with you it
is useful - I also felt the need for it couple of times ;).
what I suggest is the following:
- via configuration you can define sets of rtpproxys (multiple sets)
- from script, you can specify t
Revision: 1944
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1944&view=rev
Author: miconda
Date: 2007-04-03 04:07:55 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
- safety check for cseq header in reply
Modified Paths:
--
branches/1.1/modules/textops/textops.
Revision: 1943
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1943&view=rev
Author: miconda
Date: 2007-04-03 04:06:05 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
- safety check for cseq header in reply
Modified Paths:
--
branches/1.2/modules/textops/textops.
Revision: 1942
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1942&view=rev
Author: miconda
Date: 2007-04-03 04:03:33 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
- safety check for cseq header in reply
- dev version increased
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/Makefil
I would be interested to participate too.
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:05 +0300, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Henning,
>
> count me also in(even if I have to installan IRC client :P)...
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Henning Westerholt wrote:
> > On Monday 02 April 2007 17:14, Daniel-Constantin
Revision: 1941
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1941&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2007-04-03 02:45:08 -0700 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
---
backport from 1.2:
- fixed bug when the ssl library you compile against uses kerberos. Kerberos
implementa
Hi Henning,
count me also in(even if I have to installan IRC client :P)...
regards,
bogdan
Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Monday 02 April 2007 17:14, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello Henning,
might be good idea. Let's try to organize it after the Easter holidays.
We need more peopl
Hi Klaus,
thanks for pointing is out - I will take care of this.
regards,
bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
I wonder why this was not backported to 1.1?
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Revision: 1758
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=1758&view=rev
Author: bogd
Hi Ovidiu,
make sense :) I will have it on my todo list for 1.3
thanks and regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
yeah ... I aready did that :)
but since you were asking for suggestions ...
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 2/14/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ovidiu,
yes, it will h
On Monday 02 April 2007 17:14, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello Henning,
>
> might be good idea. Let's try to organize it after the Easter holidays.
> We need more people to be enthusiastic about it, so, let's see who is
> interested in such electronic meeting :-) ...
Hi Daniel,
after East
28 matches
Mail list logo
