Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>> The flat model has many optimization ways in comparison with the multilevel
>> one. Like we can cache the pid value on structs and some other.
>>
>> Moreover having generic level nesting sounds reasonable. Having single level
>> nesting - too as all the namespace we have
> The flat model has many optimization ways in comparison with the multilevel
> one. Like we can cache the pid value on structs and some other.
>
> Moreover having generic level nesting sounds reasonable. Having single level
> nesting - too as all the namespace we have are single nested. But havi
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Pavel Emelianov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>> Dave Hansen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:45 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> The detailed results are the following:
> Test name:spawn execlshellps (sys time)
> 1(
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Pavel Emelianov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:45 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
The detailed results are the following:
Test name:spawn execlshellps (sys time)
1(no ns) :579.1 618.31
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Pavel Emelianov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:45 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
The detailed results are the following:
Test name:spawn execlshellps (sys time)
1(no ns) :579.1 618.31
Quoting Pavel Emelianov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:45 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> >> The detailed results are the following:
> >> Test name:spawn execlshellps (sys time)
> >> 1(no ns) :579.1 618.31623.2 3.052s
> >> 2(suka
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:45 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>> The detailed results are the following:
>> Test name:spawn execlshellps (sys time)
>> 1(no ns) :579.1 618.31623.2 3.052s
>> 2(suka's):570.7 610.81600.2 3.107s
>> Slowdown :
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:45 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> The detailed results are the following:
> Test name:spawn execlshellps (sys time)
> 1(no ns) :579.1 618.31623.2 3.052s
> 2(suka's):570.7 610.81600.2 3.107s
> Slowdown :1.5% 1.3% 1.4%
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi Eric, Suka, guys.
>>
>> I have tested the following configurations:
>>
>> 1. 2.6.21-mm2 kernel with Suka's patches with CONFIG_PID_NS=n
>> 2. the same with CONFIG_PID_NS=y
>>
>> 3. 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 kernel with my own real
Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Eric, Suka, guys.
>
> I have tested the following configurations:
>
> 1. 2.6.21-mm2 kernel with Suka's patches with CONFIG_PID_NS=n
> 2. the same with CONFIG_PID_NS=y
>
> 3. 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 kernel with my own realisation (patches will
>be sent la
10 matches
Mail list logo