On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our QE (and sometimes our users) are working hard testing and
> reporting bugs, but
> their effort is never mentioned in our code.
>
> Looking at kernel git history, I found that they are using the
> Reported-By header for
> giving
Hi Alexander
I tried your method ,and it works! right, I want to redirect another page
after user logged out, but also I want Ovirt-engine could execute Logout user
command to clear session.
I tried to insert Window.Location.replrace in LoginModel.java ,
ApplicationPlaceManager.java etc.
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "Nir Soffer"
> To: "devel"
> Cc: "Piotr Kliczewski"
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 4:45:13 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-devel] Reported-By - giving credit to our testers
>
> Hi all,
>
> Our QE (and sometimes our users) are working hard testing and
> report
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:42:32PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dan Kenig
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:42:32PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dan Kenigsberg
> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08:07PM +0100, Fabi
- Original Message -
> From: "Yaniv Kaul"
> To: "Nir Soffer"
> Cc: "Piotr Kliczewski" , "devel"
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 4:55:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Reported-By - giving credit to our testers
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Nir Soffer < nsof...@redhat.com >
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our QE (and sometimes our users) are working hard testing and
> reporting bugs, but
> their effort is never mentioned in our code.
>
> Looking at kernel git history, I found that they are using the
> Reported-By header for
> giving
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:49 PM, David Caro wrote:
> On 11/12, Francesco Romani wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Nir Soffer"
> > > To: "devel"
> > > Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" , "Francesco Romani" <
> from...@redhat.com>, "Piotr Kliczewski"
> > > , "Adam Litke" , "Allon
> Mureinik
On 11/12, Francesco Romani wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nir Soffer"
> > To: "devel"
> > Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" , "Francesco Romani"
> > , "Piotr Kliczewski"
> > , "Adam Litke" , "Allon Mureinik"
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:45:13 PM
> > Subject: Reported-By - g
- Original Message -
> From: "Nir Soffer"
> To: "devel"
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" , "Francesco Romani"
> , "Piotr Kliczewski"
> , "Adam Litke" , "Allon Mureinik"
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:45:13 PM
> Subject: Reported-By - giving credit to our testers
>
> Hi all,
>
> Our QE
Hi all,
Our QE (and sometimes our users) are working hard testing and
reporting bugs, but
their effort is never mentioned in our code.
Looking at kernel git history, I found that they are using the
Reported-By header for
giving credit to the person reporting a bug. I suggest we adapt this header.
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 01:41:38 PM 温蓓 wrote:
> HiI want to redirct the page when ovirt admin logout, so I add
> :Window.Location.replace("/test.html") in ApplicationPlaceManager.java as
> below:
> @Override
> public void revealDefaultPlace() {
> PlaceRequest pr = getDefaultPlace()
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:42:32PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>> >> Hey,
>> >>
>> >> what is the expectation/as
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:42:32PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> what is the expectation/assumption about firewalld on a CentOS 7 host
> >> where you want
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> what is the expectation/assumption about firewalld on a CentOS 7 host
>> where you want to install vdsm onto?
>>
>> Is vdsm taking care of it?
>>
>> I'm asking thi
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Hey,
>
> what is the expectation/assumption about firewalld on a CentOS 7 host
> where you want to install vdsm onto?
>
> Is vdsm taking care of it?
>
> I'm asking this, because firewalld seems to be in the default package
> (plea
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Fabian Deutsch
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> what is the expectation/assumption about firewalld on a CentOS 7 host
>> where you want to install vdsm onto?
>>
>> Is vdsm taking care of it?
>
>
> ovirt-host
FYI
oVirt Fedora 21 support will end as well.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin Fenzi
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:24 PM
Subject: Reminder: Fedora 21 end of life on 2015-12-01
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org,
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, annou...@lists.fed
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Fabian Deutsch
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> what is the expectation/assumption about firewalld on a CentOS 7 host
> where you want to install vdsm onto?
>
> Is vdsm taking care of it?
>
ovirt-host-deploy should take care of disabling firewalld and enabling
iptables.
>
>
On 11/12, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:43:14PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for introducing the new job.
> > > However, I see that the job that runs on spec changes fails:
> > >
> > > http://jenkin
Hey,
what is the expectation/assumption about firewalld on a CentOS 7 host
where you want to install vdsm onto?
Is vdsm taking care of it?
I'm asking this, because firewalld seems to be in the default package
(please correct me if I am wrong) set of CentOS 7 and thus installed
by default.
- fab
On 11/12, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:41:11PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> > >
> > > > ccing devel.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:32 PM,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:41:11PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> >
> > > ccing devel.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Nir Soffer
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> This currently
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:41:11PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>
> > ccing devel.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> >
> >> This currently breaks the build for
> >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/31162
> >>
> >> 00:08:25
Hello All.
We have got the issue solved. I am readding mirrors back to the mirror list
as soon as I get confirmation it is working for each mirror.
At the moment we already have few mirrors back there.
Anton.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Anton Marchukov
wrote:
> Hello All.
>
> Following
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:43:14PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>
> > Thanks for introducing the new job.
> > However, I see that the job that runs on spec changes fails:
> >
> > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc23-x
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> fedora 23 jobs are failing because of missing dependencies.
>
> Lets wait with this until the ci becomes stable.
>
fedora 23 VDSM jobs are failing because https://gerrit.ovirt.org/48408 has
not been merged yet.
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1
HiI want to redirct the page when ovirt admin logout, so I add
:Window.Location.replace("/test.html") in ApplicationPlaceManager.java as
below: @Override public void revealDefaultPlace() { PlaceRequest
pr = getDefaultPlace(); if (pr == null) {
//Window.Location.
fedora 23 jobs are failing because of missing dependencies.
Lets wait with this until the ci becomes stable.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Hi,
> can we drop FC22 testing in jenkins now that FC23 jobs are up and running?
> it will reduce jenkins load. If needed we ca
Hi,
can we drop FC22 testing in jenkins now that FC23 jobs are up and running?
it will reduce jenkins load. If needed we can keep FC22 builds, just
dropping the check jobs.
Comments?
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
30 matches
Mail list logo
