On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Moran Goldboim
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Moran Goldboim
>> wrote:
>>
>>> my pov - really depends on when do
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Moran Goldboim
> wrote:
>
>> my pov - really depends on when do we release 4.1.
>> short version (Dec 16) - we should keep it, and 3.6 api as well
>> long
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:13:40PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We should not support now Engine 3.5 with ovirt 4.0, but vdsm
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:13:40PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We should not support now Engine 3.5 with ovirt 4.0, but vdsm still
>> accept 3.5 engines - I guess we forgot to disable it in 4.0.
>
> Correct.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Yaniv Dary wrote:
> What is the cost of keeping them?
Hard to tell, I guess each time you touch code related to the api,
your effort is
doubled.
> Yaniv Dary
> Technical Product Manager
> Red Hat Israel Ltd.
> 34 Jerusalem Road
> Building A,
> On 19 Jun 2016, at 15:06, Moran Goldboim wrote:
>
> my pov - really depends on when do we release 4.1.
> short version (Dec 16) - we should keep it, and 3.6 api as well
> long version (Mar 17) - let's drop it than.
I would concur
So we need a decision regarding short vs
my pov - really depends on when do we release 4.1.
short version (Dec 16) - we should keep it, and 3.6 api as well
long version (Mar 17) - let's drop it than.
bottom line - we would like to give customers/community the time to migrate
their el6 base deployment to el7 , while allowing them dual
What is the cost of keeping them?
Yaniv Dary
Technical Product Manager
Red Hat Israel Ltd.
34 Jerusalem Road
Building A, 4th floor
Ra'anana, Israel 4350109
Tel : +972 (9) 7692306
8272306
Email: yd...@redhat.com
IRC : ydary
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:13:40PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We should not support now Engine 3.5 with ovirt 4.0, but vdsm still
> accept 3.5 engines - I guess we forgot to disable it in 4.0.
Correct. There was a moment in time where we considered supporting 3.5
as well.
>
> In
Hi all,
We should not support now Engine 3.5 with ovirt 4.0, but vdsm still
accept 3.5 engines - I guess we forgot to disable it in 4.0.
In 4.1, I don't think we should support any 3.x Engine - otherwise we
will have to waste time maintaining old apis and infrastructure, instead
of adding new
10 matches
Mail list logo