Re: [riot-devel] RPL DAO target concat from fib

2017-10-19 Thread Landsmann, Martin
Hey Rahul, Cenk, Koen, > 6lo frag is not a good option to use and should be avoided as far as possible. right, but as we all know it cannot be achieved all the time. > Supporting target aggregation in DAO without depending on 6lo frag I think that would be the right direction for mitigating the

Re: [riot-devel] RPL DAO target concat from fib

2017-10-19 Thread Oleg Hahm
Hi Rahul! Just a small remark regarding one of your comments: On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:16:17AM +0530, Rahul Jadhav wrote: > 2. RIOT does not handle L2 retry-count feedback to maintain RPL metric (for > e.g. ETX). > Pls correct if i m wrong. One problem here is that not all radio devices report

Re: [riot-devel] RPL DAO target concat from fib

2017-10-19 Thread Oleg Hahm
Hey Rahul, another clarification question: On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:16:17AM +0530, Rahul Jadhav wrote: > > But with the addition of a proper > > 6lowpan fragmentation, we dropped that functionality. > > [RJ] 6lo frag is not a good option to use and should be avoided as far as > possible. Is

Re: [riot-devel] RPL DAO target concat from fib

2017-10-19 Thread Carsten Bormann
On Oct 18, 2017, at 20:30, Rahul Jadhav wrote: > > i do not have 6lo fragmentation enabled. Rahul, 6LoWPAN does not give you that choice. If you need interoperability, you need to support adaptation layer fragmentation. Grüße, Carsten ___ devel m

Re: [riot-devel] RPL DAO target concat from fib

2017-10-19 Thread Rahul Jadhav
I have disabled 6lo frag just to check which all cases results in fragmentation and to check if an alternative is available/possible. "6lo frag is mandatorily needed", no doubt (and its must as per specs). It s just best to avoid it if possible. One reason (which also is applicable in the DAO scen

Re: [riot-devel] RPL DAO target concat from fib

2017-10-19 Thread Rahul Jadhav
Hi Oleg, Pls find my comments inline. Regards, Rahul On 19 October 2017 at 17:12, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hey Rahul, > > another clarification question: > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:16:17AM +0530, Rahul Jadhav wrote: > > > > But with the addition of a proper > > > 6lowpan fragmentation, we droppe

[riot-devel] Jimini Board support announcement

2017-10-19 Thread Arndt, Josua
Hello All, I'm happy to announce the support of a new board develop at the IAS of the RWTH Aachen. The initial PR is ongoing, it will be followed by driver and module PRs soon. Have a closer look at the wiki page to get an overview and insight of our development state. A quick status: we have

[riot-devel] rtc alarm running with threads

2017-10-19 Thread Paula Ortega Cancino
Hi, I've been working on an application that activates rtc alarms every few seconds, when the alarm is activated it sends a message to a thread. This msg is used in a thread that in its turn sends messages over gnrc. However, after a while sending messages, it stops and the mcu only gets in in th

Re: [riot-devel] Jimini Board support announcement

2017-10-19 Thread Oleg Hahm
Dear Josua, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:38:35PM +, Arndt, Josua wrote: > I'm happy to announce the support of a new board develop at the IAS of the > RWTH Aachen. The initial PR is ongoing, it will be followed by driver and > module PRs soon. Have a closer look at the wiki page to get an overvi

Re: [riot-devel] rtc alarm running with threads

2017-10-19 Thread Oleg Hahm
Dear Paula, can you share the code of your application somewhere? That might help to find the issues. I would suppose that the interrupt handler is faulty or consumes too much memory or something like this. I think start debugging with a basic application that just prints some text whenever a mes

Re: [riot-devel] RPL DAO target concat from fib

2017-10-19 Thread Oleg Hahm
Hey Rahul, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 07:25:19PM +0530, Rahul Jadhav wrote: > > > > But with the addition of a proper > > > > 6lowpan fragmentation, we dropped that functionality. > > > > > > [RJ] 6lo frag is not a good option to use and should be avoided as far as > > > possible. > > > > Is this you