Re: Query GSoC 2019 | Improve Coverity scan integration #3712

Hello Gedare, On 07/03/2019 15:35, Gedare Bloom wrote: P.S. you should also address the questions posed by Sebastian in his response to your query about Trace Compass. Ravindra Kumar Meena answered by PM. This is fine. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178

Re: [PATCH] cpukit/arm: Correct register definition

Thanks, committed. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftli

Re: [PATCH] shell: Correct argument order of `mfill`

On 01/03/2019 19:21, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: --- cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c index d8e2fcf74c..47a55d3a2f 100644 --- a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_m

Re: Doxygen Groups for cpukit

On 07/03/2019 21:57, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:55 PM Chris Johns > wrote: On 8/3/19 3:24 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/03/2019 15:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:19 AM Sebastian Huber >> mailto:sebastian.hu...

Re: Patch progress

Thanks for pinging the list. If they aren't reviewed and possibly committed before I get to work tomorrow, I will deal with them. On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 7:19 PM Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: > I sent in a couple of patches to rtems-devel last week, and nothing > happened. They were both simple one-

Patch progress

I sent in a couple of patches to rtems-devel last week, and nothing happened. They were both simple one- or two-liners that fixed bugs I happened to run into. Both were small enough that they didn't seem worth the trouble of a trac ticket. What needs to be done to move them forward? https://lis

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

I'm about to head home so not going to dig into each of those but I will point out for GSoC, we need to get you where you can answer these questions yourself. 1) clone the newlib (sourceware.org/newlib) source, RTEMS source, and rtems-libbsd source. rtems-libbsd is the source for networking AP

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

It will be very helpful to know the current status of the following tickets, and if I can choose sub-tasks from them, for GSoC project. . #3676 - Add support for aio.h . #3642 - Add iswalnum(), iswalpha() ... (and 18 others) to header . #3371 - Add dirfd() and fdopendir() methods in dirent.h . #3

Re: Doxygen Groups for cpukit

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:55 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 8/3/19 3:24 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 07/03/2019 15:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:19 AM Sebastian Huber > >> >> > wrote: > >> For the shell, very little is really a

Re: Doxygen Groups for cpukit

On 8/3/19 3:24 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/03/2019 15:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:19 AM Sebastian Huber >> > > wrote: >> For the shell, very little is really a public API. Most is internal. >> I suspect this applies in many

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:28 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Hello, > I was exploring open projects and got very much intrested in the following > ticket: > > #2966 - POSIX Compilance : https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2966 > . > As on the page, the project is divided into multiple sub-tasks. For many >

Re: Beagleboard BSP Framebuffer

Hi, I was reading up and trying to figure out the steps to achieve this project. Here's what I came up with : 1. BBB uses TD19988 HDMI Framer, so the first step is to get an HDMI output, read EDID info and set the videomode according to the info. After some searching, I found a driver in minix th

Re: [PATCH] bsps: Move umon header files

Yes. uMon supports at least m68k and ARM in addition to MIPS. So the question is does a file go in bsps/shared based on potential designed use or actual current use in the tree? --joel On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:23 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > There was some effort expended to get it working with Be

Re: Project for GSoC 2019

Am 07.03.19 um 15:18 schrieb Gedare Bloom: > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:45 AM Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > > On 06/03/2019 22:39, Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > After suggestions and response from Sebastian, Christian and Udit I > > started to

POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

Hello, I was exploring open projects and got very much intrested in the following ticket: #2966 - POSIX Compilance : https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2966 . As on the page, the project is divided into multiple sub-tasks. For many of them I am not able to find their current status and if enough work

Re: pppd unaligned trap on Sparc/LEON3

Hi Gedare, I have a fix for the GetMask function. I will have to open a ticket and submit a patch. I think the VxWorks BSP for the LEON processors provides a trap-and-emulate solution. While I hope that we can eliminate all possible unaligned traps, this would probably be worth adding to the Sp

Re: Question about PPPD Sample

Hi Sebastian, The example you provided definitely helps. I altered the samples/pppd example and I believe the connection is up, but I would like to try the telnet and ftpd to be sure. Thanks, Alan On 3/7/19, 2:06 AM, "Sebastian Huber" wrote: Hello Alan, while porting the PPP

Re: Query GSoC 2019 | Improve Coverity scan integration #3712

P.S. you should also address the questions posed by Sebastian in his response to your query about Trace Compass. On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:28 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Hi Ravindra Kumar Meena, > > I'm interested in seeing this project idea develop into a proposal and > hopefully it can be a useful

Re: pppd unaligned trap on Sparc/LEON3

Hi Alan, On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 2:34 PM Cudmore, Alan P. (GSFC-5820) < alan.p.cudm...@nasa.gov> wrote: > I’m trying to get PPP working on SPARC/LEON3. I’m currently using RTEMS > 4.11, but plan on switching to 5.x soon. > > > > While handshaking with a Linux PPP client, the LEON3 gets an unaligne

Re: Query GSoC 2019 | Improve Coverity scan integration #3712

Hi Ravindra Kumar Meena, I'm interested in seeing this project idea develop into a proposal and hopefully it can be a useful project. I would first encourage you to complete some small activities like the Google Code-In tasks related to Coverity: https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GCI/Coding/CoverityIss

Re: Doxygen Groups for cpukit

On 07/03/2019 15:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:19 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: Hello, I adjusted several hundred Doxygen groups in the BSP area this week. It is not finished, but it is now in a much better shape.

Re: [PATCH] bsps: Move umon header files

There was some effort expended to get it working with Beaglebone: https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015/BeagleBSPPortingUmon I don't know if this ever made it to primetime. We also set up some RTEMS Project repos and mailing lists to support umon, since it lacks its own community. https://git.rte

Re: Doxygen Groups for cpukit

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:19 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I adjusted several hundred Doxygen groups in the BSP area this week. It > is not finished, but it is now in a much better shape. My next step is > to adjust the groups in the cpukit area. I pro

Re: Project for GSoC 2019

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:45 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 06/03/2019 22:39, Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > After suggestions and response from Sebastian, Christian and Udit I > > started to explore the following ticket: > > > > #3338 : Port CHFS to RTEMS : https://

Re: Project for GSoC 2019

On 06/03/2019 22:39, Vaibhav Gupta wrote: After suggestions and response from Sebastian, Christian and Udit I started to explore the following ticket: #3338 : Port CHFS to RTEMS : https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3338 Sebastian, even mentioned, that it can become a very good project for GSoC 20

Doxygen Groups for cpukit

Hello, I adjusted several hundred Doxygen groups in the BSP area this week. It is not finished, but it is now in a much better shape. My next step is to adjust the groups in the cpukit area. I propose the following coarse structure: * Board Support Packages * Device Drivers   * Block Devices

Re: [PATCH] bsps: Move umon header files

On 07/03/2019 13:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: Umon if not MIPS specific even if that is the only bsp we have using it So, this code is intended to be used by several BSPs? -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax

[PATCH 2/5] bsps: Adjust shared Doxygen groups

Update #3706. --- bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-a8core-start.h| 2 +- bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-a9mpcore-irq.h| 2 +- bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-a9mpcore-regs.h | 2 +- bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-a9mpcore-start.h | 2 +- bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-errata.h | 2 +-

[PATCH 0/5] Adjust Doxygen groups in BSP area

This patch set adjust several hundred Doxygen groups in the BSP area. It creates a hierarchy as follows: * Board Support Packages * Arch * BSP * BSP-specific groups * ... Sebastian Huber (5): bsps: Adjust bsp.h Doxygen groups bsps: Adjust shared Doxygen groups bsps/arm:

[PATCH 4/5] bsp/altera-cyclone-v: Add Doxygen groups

Add Doxygen groups for contributed code which would otherwise end up at the top level. Update #3706. --- bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/contrib/doxygen.h | 85 +++ bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/include/bsp/hwlib.h | 8 --- 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) creat

[PATCH 5/5] bsp/atsam: Add Doxygen groups

Add Doxygen groups for contributed code which would otherwise end up at the top level (about 178 groups). Update #3706. --- bsps/arm/atsam/contrib/doxygen.h | ++ 1 file changed, insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsps/arm/atsam/contrib/doxygen.h diff

[PATCH 3/5] bsps/arm: Adjust CMSIS Doxygen groups

Update #3706. --- bsps/arm/include/cmsis_gcc.h| 2 ++ bsps/arm/include/core_cm7.h | 3 +++ bsps/arm/include/core_cmInstr.h | 1 + bsps/arm/include/core_cmSimd.h | 1 + bsps/arm/shared/doxygen.h | 8 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/bsps/arm/include/cmsis_gcc.

Re: [PATCH] bsps: Move umon header files

Umon if not MIPS specific even if that is the only bsp we have using it On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 2:46 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > They are only used by the csb337 BSP. > --- > bsps/{ => arm/csb337}/include/rtems/umon.h | 0 > bsps/{ => arm/csb337}/include/umon

Query GSoC 2019 | Improve Coverity scan integration #3712

Hi, After exploring open projects for GSoC 2019. I started to explore the following ticket opened by Gedare Bloom: #3712: Improve Coverity scan integration: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3710 It would be great to know if any of the mentors would like to mentor this project this year. I would li

Survey for RTEMS SMP space profile

Hello, in order to provide a good feature set for the RTEMS SMP space profile we need some help from RTEMS users. An ongoing ESA activity tries to pre-qualify a subset of RTEMS according to ECSS standards (ECSS-E-ST-40C and ECSS-Q-ST-80C). The space profile of RTEMS SMP is intended for applic

[PATCH] bsps: Move umon header files

They are only used by the csb337 BSP. --- bsps/{ => arm/csb337}/include/rtems/umon.h | 0 bsps/{ => arm/csb337}/include/umon/cli.h| 0 bsps/{ => arm/csb337}/include/umon/monlib.h | 0 bsps/{ => arm/csb337}/include/umon/tfs.h| 0 4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename bsp