Re: [PATCH rtems-net-legacy 1/2] Remove RTEMS_NETWORKING checks

2021-04-02 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:48 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:40 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:53 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 7:42 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > ping

Re: #3860 - GSoC enquiries

2021-04-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 6:09 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, 6:59 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:48 PM Ida Delphine wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > Please can you help explain what you mean by Adding a "check-style" target >> > to the RTEMS build system?

[PATCH rtems-net-legacy] netlegacy: Use os.path to get the file extension

2021-04-02 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
--- bsp_drivers.py | 5 +++-- netlegacy.py | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsp_drivers.py b/bsp_drivers.py index cb6caa5..3ca10c6 100644 --- a/bsp_drivers.py +++ b/bsp_drivers.py @@ -62,9 +62,10 @@ def bsp_files(bld): source_dir =

[PATCH rtems-net-legacy v2] Remove RTEMS_NETWORKING checks

2021-04-02 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
* Remove nfsclient wscript and build from netlegacy.py --- bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/net/smsc9218i.c | 4 +-- libmisc/dummy-networking.c | 44 - netlegacy.py| 18 +- nfsclient/wscript | 1 +

Re: #3860 - GSoC enquiries

2021-04-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, 6:59 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:48 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Please can you help explain what you mean by Adding a "check-style" > target to the RTEMS build system? > > And how I could possibly go about this? > > > I don't know if this

Re: #3860 - GSoC enquiries

2021-04-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:48 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > Hello, > Please can you help explain what you mean by Adding a "check-style" target to > the RTEMS build system? > And how I could possibly go about this? > I don't know if this makes sense exactly to me. When compiling RTEMS it could be

Re: #3860 - GSoC enquiries

2021-04-02 Thread Ida Delphine
Hello, Please can you help explain what you mean by *Adding a "check-style" target to the RTEMS build system*? And how I could possibly go about this? Cheers, Ida On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:45 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:28 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > > > Yes I have. But

Re: Ticket#3889 updated

2021-04-02 Thread zack_on_the_speed_chanel
Yes the build works successfully. I tried to also just try BUILD_PSXTESTS only and it failed midway. I also tried to do an automated build. It failed with __start symbol not found. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, April 1, 2021 10:10 PM, Gedare

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs v2 1/2] Added FAQ page

2021-04-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 2:26 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:19 PM Ayushman Mishra > wrote: > > > > --- > > user/bld/index.rst | 2 + > > user/overview/index.rst | 2 + > > user/start/faq.rst | 295 +++ > >

Re: Ticket#3889 updated

2021-04-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:19 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel wrote: > > Yes the build works successfully. I tried to also just try BUILD_PSXTESTS > only and it failed midway. I also tried to do an automated build. It failed > with __start symbol not found. > > You also need to enable the POSIX

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added FAQ page

2021-04-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:55 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:50 PM Ayushman Mishra > wrote: >> >> Sir, It was given as an issue https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3958 ( >> Review wiki/TBR/Website/FAQ for correct links) for the faq page >>

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs v2 1/2] Added FAQ page

2021-04-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:19 PM Ayushman Mishra wrote: > > --- > user/bld/index.rst | 2 + > user/overview/index.rst | 2 + > user/start/faq.rst | 295 +++ > user/start/index.rst | 1 + > user/support/contrib.rst

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added FAQ page

2021-04-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:50 PM Ayushman Mishra wrote: > Sir, It was given as an issue https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3958 ( > Review wiki/TBR/Website/FAQ for correct links) for the faq page > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TBR/Website/FAQ Thanks for confirming that. When Gedare acks the patches

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added FAQ page

2021-04-02 Thread Ayushman Mishra
Sir, It was given as an issue https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3958 ( Review wiki/TBR/Website/FAQ for correct links) for the faq page https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TBR/Website/FAQ On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 12:10 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:19 PM Ayushman Mishra > wrote:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added FAQ page

2021-04-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:19 PM Ayushman Mishra wrote: > Greetings Sir, > I have corrected and send patches regarding FAQ page in user manual.I > was able to build the page on my system and also attached a > screen-shot of the builded page on browser . I have corrected > whitespace consistency

[PATCH rtems-docs v2 2/2] Corrected link

2021-04-02 Thread Ayushman Mishra
--- eng/stakeholders.rst | 4 +++- user/bld/index.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eng/stakeholders.rst b/eng/stakeholders.rst index 756c462..a4413cf 100644 --- a/eng/stakeholders.rst +++ b/eng/stakeholders.rst @@ -10,4 +10,6 @@ You are a potential

[PATCH rtems-docs v2 1/2] Added FAQ page

2021-04-02 Thread Ayushman Mishra
--- user/bld/index.rst | 2 + user/overview/index.rst | 2 + user/start/faq.rst | 295 +++ user/start/index.rst | 1 + user/support/contrib.rst | 96 +- user/support/support-project.rst | 2 + 6

Re: [PATCH] STM32H743ZI Nucleo and basic lwIP support

2021-04-02 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 2:25 AM Robin Müller wrote: > > Hi Vijay, > > It looks interesting, but I am not really a LwIP expert. I might look into it once I have more time in 1-2 weeks. > I only have a BBB and the STM32H7 as test HW right now, but I guess this is a good starting point. That indeed

Re: GSoC Project - Beagle BSP Projects

2021-04-02 Thread Christian Mauderer
On 02/04/2021 08:36, Ahamed Husni wrote: >     Yes, this seems like an area that can be chipped away at, with a >     strong plan of activities. My concern would be whether it is about >     writing code or not? > > > After completing the above

Re: GSOC project: #4334 Replace Mongoose with Civetweb

2021-04-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 10:13 PM Ayushman Mishra wrote: > > Respected Sir, > > 1. I successfully build and installed the tool suit in rtems6 > (../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/6 > devel/qemu.bset) , this time all executable related to qemu This is building and

GSoC 2021 - Raspberry Pi projects

2021-04-02 Thread Pranav Dangi
Hi everyone, I am keen on working on the Raspberry Pi project #2899 . However, the ticket and also the TODOs in the github README for the same haven't been updated since 4 years, so I am not sure

Re: [PATCH] STM32H743ZI Nucleo and basic lwIP support

2021-04-02 Thread Robin Müller
The change with void HAL_ETH_MspInit(ETH_HandleTypeDef *heth) was just that most other function definitions I saw were on one line so I assumed this was a little formatting mistake. I can discard the change if this was intentional. I can add #ifndef __rtems__ for the section with the legacy

Re: [PATCH] STM32H743ZI Nucleo and basic lwIP support

2021-04-02 Thread Robin Müller
Hi Vijay, It looks interesting, but I am not really a LwIP expert. I might look into it once I have more time in 1-2 weeks. I only have a BBB and the STM32H7 as test HW right now, but I guess this is a good starting point. Does this mean that the lwIP repository contains the architecture specific

Re: GSoC Project - Beagle BSP Projects

2021-04-02 Thread Ahamed Husni
> > > Yes, this seems like an area that can be chipped away at, with a >> > strong plan of activities. My concern would be whether it is about >> > writing code or not? >> > >> > >> > After completing the above milestones, if we have more time I can start >> > to work on >> > the Mass