libbsd updates

Hello, recently an internal discussion about updates in the libbsd started. All who participated in the discussion agreed that we should move the discussion to a public one. Below you can find the mail thread. It's oldest mail first. Mails are split with lines of = signs. I removed some

Re: [PATCH 2/3] build: Replace variant patterns with a list

On 20.01.23 00:36, Chris Johns wrote: So let me turn this around ... I am do not understand your resistance to there being importable modules of python in rtems.git to read and write these files in rtems.git? These modules are in rtems-central.git (which has rtems.git as a submodule) together

Re: [PATCH 1/3] build: Format build items

On 17.01.23 22:52, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/1/2023 6:39 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 17.01.23 03:48, Chris Johns wrote: On 16/1/2023 6:56 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 16.01.23 01:35, Chris Johns wrote: On 13/1/2023 1:54 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 12.01.23 15:44, Kinsey Moore wrote:

Re: [PATCH] build: Update PyYAML to 5.4.1

On 20.01.23 03:59, Chris Johns wrote: On 20/1/2023 1:51 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:23 PM Chris Johns wrote: On 20/1/2023 2:19 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: The latest version is 6.0 which dropped support for Python 2.7. Was 6 our last version to support python 2 and 3?

Re: [PATCHES rtems, source-builder] Add GitHub Actions scripts

Am 20.01.23 um 06:21 schrieb Chris Johns: On 20/1/2023 1:50 am, Christian MAUDERER wrote: Am 19.01.23 um 15:42 schrieb Gedare Bloom: Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will it leave any artifacts

Re: [PATCHES rtems, source-builder] Add GitHub Actions scripts

On 20/1/2023 1:50 am, Christian MAUDERER wrote: > Am 19.01.23 um 15:42 schrieb Gedare Bloom: >> Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a >> little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will >> it leave any artifacts behind in the RTEMS github mirror? >

Re: [PATCH] build: Update PyYAML to 5.4.1

On 20/1/2023 1:59 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > On 20/1/2023 1:51 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:23 PM Chris Johns wrote: >>> >>> On 20/1/2023 2:19 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: The latest version is 6.0 which dropped support for Python 2.7. >>> >>> Was 6 our last version to

Re: [PATCH 1/3] build: Format build items

On 20/1/2023 11:53 am, Amar Takhar wrote: > On 2023-01-20 11:03 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: > >> I have been OK with the headers and tests being generated this way because >> the >> agreement is files in rtems.git can be manually edited and rtems-central has >> to >> track those changes. The

Re: [PATCH 1/3] build: Format build items

On 20/1/2023 11:22 am, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Sorry to hijack that thread, but correction is needed here. > > On 1/20/23 01:03, Chris Johns wrote: >> The FreeBSD single repo is about the kernel and base runtime. The ports are >> not >> part of this so the analogy breaks down. > > Certainly

Re: [PATCH] build: Update PyYAML to 5.4.1

On 20/1/2023 1:51 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:23 PM Chris Johns wrote: >> >> On 20/1/2023 2:19 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> The latest version is 6.0 which dropped support for Python 2.7. >> >> Was 6 our last version to support python 2 and 3? >> >> Is making this change

Re: [PATCH] build: Update PyYAML to 5.4.1

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:23 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 20/1/2023 2:19 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > The latest version is 6.0 which dropped support for Python 2.7. > > Was 6 our last version to support python 2 and 3? > > Is making this change this close to a release wise? > I sense confusion

Re: [PATCH 1/3] build: Format build items

On 2023-01-20 11:03 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: > It is good to know the amount of python is small. It should be easy to add :) Agreed. > I have been OK with the headers and tests being generated this way because the > agreement is files in rtems.git can be manually edited and rtems-central has

Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] testsuites/libtest/dl11: Add DL test for TLS

On 1/19/2023 6:16 PM, Chris Johns wrote: On 20/1/2023 8:40 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: On 1/15/2023 6:07 PM, Chris Johns wrote: On 13/1/2023 12:51 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 5:11 PM Joel Sherrill mailto:j...@rtems.org>> wrote: Will this need to be added as an expected

Re: [PATCH] build: Update PyYAML to 5.4.1

On 20/1/2023 2:19 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > The latest version is 6.0 which dropped support for Python 2.7. Was 6 our last version to support python 2 and 3? Is making this change this close to a release wise? Chris ___ devel mailing list

Re: [PATCH 1/3] build: Format build items

Sorry to hijack that thread, but correction is needed here. On 1/20/23 01:03, Chris Johns wrote: The FreeBSD single repo is about the kernel and base runtime. The ports are not part of this so the analogy breaks down. Certainly all BSDs have separated ports repos, but AFAIK all of them

Re: [PATCH 1/1] RSB: Mitigate too short error reports

On 20/1/2023 3:13 am, Frank Kühndel wrote: > Hi Joel, > > On 1/19/23 15:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Subject: >> Re: [PATCH 1/1] RSB: Mitigate too short error reports >> From: >> Joel Sherrill >> Date: >> 1/19/23, 15:08 >> >> To: >> Frank Kühndel >> CC: >> Chris Johns , devel@rtems.org >> >>

Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] testsuites/libtest/dl11: Add DL test for TLS

On 20/1/2023 8:40 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > On 1/15/2023 6:07 PM, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 13/1/2023 12:51 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 5:11 PM Joel Sherrill >> > wrote: >>> >>> Will this need to be added as an expected fail on other

Re: [PATCH 1/3] build: Format build items

On 20/1/2023 6:01 am, Amar Takhar wrote: > On 2023-01-19 08:21 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >> In rtems-central.git there are Python modules and scripts which generate >> source, header, and documentation files from specification items. This >> repository contains the pre-qualification

Re: [PATCH 2/3] build: Replace variant patterns with a list

On 19/1/2023 6:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 19.01.23 01:17, Chris Johns wrote: Why has this been done? >>> The enabled-by expressions used in patch 3 do not support regular >>> expressions. >> I did not pick that up. Why was that regx functionality removed? Is it >> related >> to

[PATCH] spec: Install NandPsu headers correctly

These headers were mistakenly placed in the root of the installed BSP include directory. They should be in dev/nand. --- spec/build/bsps/objnandpsu.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/spec/build/bsps/objnandpsu.yml b/spec/build/bsps/objnandpsu.yml index

Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] testsuites/libtest/dl11: Add DL test for TLS

On 1/15/2023 6:07 PM, Chris Johns wrote: On 13/1/2023 12:51 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 5:11 PM Joel Sherrill mailto:j...@rtems.org>> wrote: Will this need to be added as an expected fail on other architectures? Just wondering how many bsp test configuration

Re: [PATCH 1/3] build: Format build items

On 2023-01-19 08:21 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > In rtems-central.git there are Python modules and scripts which generate > source, header, and documentation files from specification items. This > repository contains the pre-qualification support for RTEMS. By > accident, a part of the

Re: [PATCH 1/1] RSB: Mitigate too short error reports

Hi Joel, On 1/19/23 15:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] RSB: Mitigate too short error reports From: Joel Sherrill Date: 1/19/23, 15:08 To: Frank Kühndel CC: Chris Johns , devel@rtems.org On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:47 AM Frank Kühndel < frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de>

Re: [PATCH] build: Update PyYAML to 5.4.1

The latest version is 6.0 which dropped support for Python 2.7. -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUBER Dornierstr. 4 82178 Puchheim Germany email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 Registergericht: Amtsgericht München

[PATCH] build: Update PyYAML to 5.4.1

--- yaml/LICENSE | 2 +- yaml/PKG-INFO | 14 ++ yaml/lib/yaml/__init__.py | 2 +- yaml/lib/yaml/constructor.py | 30 ++ yaml/lib/yaml/cyaml.py| 2 +- yaml/lib/yaml/reader.py | 9 +++--

Re: [PATCHES rtems, source-builder] Add GitHub Actions scripts

Am 19.01.23 um 15:42 schrieb Gedare Bloom: Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will it leave any artifacts behind in the RTEMS github mirror? As soon as we want to get rid of the scripts again

Re: [PATCHES rtems, source-builder] Add GitHub Actions scripts

On 19.01.23 15:42, Gedare Bloom wrote: Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will it leave any artifacts behind in the RTEMS github mirror? It seems by default stuff is kept for about 90 days:

Re: [PATCHES rtems, source-builder] Add GitHub Actions scripts

Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will it leave any artifacts behind in the RTEMS github mirror? On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 6:42 AM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > Hello, > > some weeks ago I created a

Re: [PATCH 1/1] RSB: Mitigate too short error reports

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:47 AM Frank Kühndel < frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Chris, > Hello Joel, > > On 1/16/23 18:27, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Subject: > > Re: [PATCH 1/1] RSB: Mitigate too short error reports > > From: > > Joel Sherrill > > Date: > > 1/16/23, 18:27 > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] RSB: Mitigate too short error reports

Hello Chris, Hello Joel, On 1/16/23 18:27, Joel Sherrill wrote: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] RSB: Mitigate too short error reports From: Joel Sherrill Date: 1/16/23, 18:27 To: Frank Kühndel CC: Chris Johns , devel@rtems.org On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 8:46 AM Frank Kühndel <