Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] bsps/beagle: Adding QEP driver support to BeagleBoneBlack BSP

On 23/2/21 7:18 pm, James Fitzsimons wrote: > --- > bsps/arm/beagle/headers.am | 2 + > bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp/bbb-pwm.h | 11 - > bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp/pwmss.h | 54 +++ > bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp/qep.h | 382 >

Re: Unchecked return value on third party code

On 24/2/21 7:45 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021, 2:36 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 24/2/21 3:29 am, Christian MAUDERER wrote: > > Yes, I know. Upstream loops can be quite time consuming. I'm waiting > since >

Re: Device Drivers Which Include mkdir("/dev")

On 24/2/21 2:18 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 2:52 AM Daniel Hellstrom > wrote: > I think the main reason why the mkdir() is called in the first place, from > for example rasta-io driver, is that once other drivers register their >

Re: Unchecked return value on third party code

On 24/2/21 3:29 am, Christian MAUDERER wrote: > Yes, I know. Upstream loops can be quite time consuming. I'm waiting since > about > half a year that a FreeBSD patch for the i.MX6ULL SDHCI gets reviewed (after > someone here suggested it should go upstream). It's not a chip that is used in >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Resubmission of patch previously submitted Sept 2020

tter in > am335x.h header. > > The driver supports two primary modes of operation. A polled mode (which is > the > default mode), and an interrupt event driven mode. > > This patch includes the following revisions after feedback from Chris Johns: > - improved documentation &

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] user/bsps: Mention fixed console baud rate for zynq

On 20/2/21 3:59 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:21 AM Jan Sommer wrote: >> >> --- >> user/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq.rst | 14 ++ >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/user/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq.rst b/user/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq.rst >> index

Re: Device Drivers Which Include mkdir("/dev")

On 21/2/21 5:29 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:26 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021, 5:32 PM Chris Johns wrote: >>> >>> On 20/2/21 7:56 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 2:51 PM Gedare Blo

Re: Device Drivers Which Include mkdir("/dev")

On 20/2/21 7:56 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 2:51 PM Gedare Bloom > wrote: > > I think the suggestion is to provide a catch-all rather than try to add > new > faults for every possible condition. This mkdir is a pretty esoteric fault >

Re: [6-freebsd-12 PATCH 1/2] rtemsbsd/bus: Add PCI support to the nexus bus

On 17/2/21 4:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/02/2021 03:20, Chris Johns wrote: > >> I have looked into this some more with Joel. Comments below .. >> >> On 16/2/21 5:49 pm, Chris Johns wrote: >>> Hi Sebastian, >>> >>> Thank you for the

Re: Fwd: Buildbot failure in RTEMS on powerpc/psim FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE GCC 7.3.0 POSIX

dbot.rtems.org/> > > Worker for this Build: build-1 > > Build Reason: > Blamelist: Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>>, G S > Niteesh > Babu mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>, Ryan Long > mailto:ryan.l...@oarcorp.com>>, Sebastia

Re: [PATCH 1/1] zynq-uart: Fix set_attributes implementation

On 17/2/21 11:47 pm, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Chris Johns >> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:08 AM >> To: Sommer, Jan ; devel@rtems.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] zynq-uart: Fix set_attributes implementation >> >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] misc: tools: fix mkimage.py script type processing

On 18/2/21 3:26 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:35 AM wrote: >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> as far as my understanding of python goes this does not make any difference. >> Strings are essentially arrays in python which would make the parenthesis >> obsolete. >> >> When this condition

Re: [6-freebsd-12 PATCH 1/2] rtemsbsd/bus: Add PCI support to the nexus bus

I have looked into this some more with Joel. Comments below .. On 16/2/21 5:49 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Thank you for the review. > > On 16/2/21 5:05 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >> On 16/02/2021 03:02, chr...@rtems.org wrote: >>> +/*

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] bsps/xilinx_zynq: Add SPI driver for cadence-spi

On 17/2/21 7:34 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:44 AM wrote: >>> On Feb 16, 2021, at 11:33 , Gedare Bloom wrote: The umlaut is part of the official brand. That can be tricky, depending on the corporate policy. > I find it odd to avoid Unicode and not allow

Re: [PATCH 1/1] misc: tools: fix mkimage.py script type processing

On 12/2/21 3:23 am, Jan Sommer wrote: > From: Andre Nahrwold > > --- > misc/tools/mkimage.py | 10 ++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/misc/tools/mkimage.py b/misc/tools/mkimage.py > index fd75f0a..111e224 100755 > --- a/misc/tools/mkimage.py > +++

Re: [6-freebsd-12 PATCH v2 2/2] bsp/motorola_powerpc: Add dc and ukphy support

On 16/2/21 5:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 16/02/2021 03:10, chr...@rtems.org wrote: > >> diff --git a/freebsd/sys/dev/dc/if_dcreg.h b/freebsd/sys/dev/dc/if_dcreg.h >> index 9ae26cc6..836e70f8 100644 >> --- a/freebsd/sys/dev/dc/if_dcreg.h >> +++ b/freebsd/sys/dev/dc/if_dcreg.h >> @@ -824,6

Re: [6-freebsd-12 PATCH 1/2] rtemsbsd/bus: Add PCI support to the nexus bus

Hi Sebastian, Thank you for the review. On 16/2/21 5:05 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 16/02/2021 03:02, chr...@rtems.org wrote: >> +/* >> + * Values for the bus space tag, not to be used directly by MI code. >> + */ >> +#define    BSP_BUS_SPACE_IO    0    /* space is i/o space */ >>

Re: [PATCH 0/1] misc: tools: fix mkimage.py script type processing

On 12/2/21 3:23 am, Jan Sommer wrote: > Here is the patch from Andre also in git send-email format. Thanks. Pushed. > It would be great if we could integrate it in master and the 5 braches. I have created a ticket and pushed the change to the 5 branch. It would be a help if a ticket and tested

Re: [6-freebsd-12 PATCH 2/2] bsp/motorola_powerpc: Add dc and ukphy support

On 16/2/21 1:02 pm, chr...@rtems.org wrote: > From: Chris Johns > > - Add the dc net dev to the BSP > > - Add the ukphy support > > Closes # 4246 > --- > freebsd/sys/dev/dc/if_dc.c| 10 -- > freebsd/sys/dev/dc/if_dcreg.h

Re: [PATCH] tests/validation: Fix 64bit test failure

On 16/2/21 2:12 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > From: ryan long The email address looks wrong to me. Chris > > The ts-validation-0 test currently fails on 64bit BSPs due to a > limitation of the message structure. Changing the max message size to a > size_t type and adjusting the expected value in

Re: Requests Patches to be Applied to 4.10

On 12/2/21 6:52 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:47 PM Gedare Bloom > wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:30 PM Joel Sherrill > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Phillip Smith pinged

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] bsps/xilinx_zynq: Add SPI driver for cadence-spi

Hi Jan, Thank you for the changes. I have one question inlined below ... On 14/2/21 10:30 pm, Jan Sommer wrote: > --- > bsps/include/dev/spi/cadence-spi-regs.h | 84 + > bsps/include/dev/spi/cadence-spi.h | 48 +++ > bsps/shared/dev/spi/cadence-spi.c | 437

Re: [PATCH 0/3] bsps/zynq: Add cadence-SPI driver

On 13/2/21 10:18 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > On 12/2/21 5:14 am, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 13/2/21 10:10 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 5:06 PM Chris Johns >> <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: >>> >>> On 13/2/21 12:25 am, J

Re: [PATCH 0/3] bsps/zynq: Add cadence-SPI driver

On 13/2/21 10:10 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 5:06 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 13/2/21 12:25 am, Jan Sommer wrote: > > This patchset implements a driver for the cadence-spi > > device of the Xili

Re: [PATCH 0/3] bsps/zynq: Add cadence-SPI driver

On 13/2/21 12:25 am, Jan Sommer wrote: > This patchset implements a driver for the cadence-spi > device of the Xilinx Zynq-7000 based SoCs using the spidev API.s Thanks for the driver. A quick review of the differences between the Zynq and Ulttrascale in this document from Xilinx:

Re: [PATCH] Update motorola_power to irq-generic interrupt management

On 13/2/21 7:35 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 1:00 PM wrote: >> >> From: Chris Johns >> >> - Add support to the BSP to enable irq-generic management >> >> - Update the powerpc shared irq code to support irq-generic. This >> is

PowerPC Exception warnings

Hello, The mvme2703 BSP is producing warnings for these lines of code: https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/bsps/powerpc/shared/exceptions/ppc_exc.S#n132 https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/bsps/powerpc/shared/exceptions/ppc_exc.S#n135 The warnings is:

Re: Remaining Waf Conversion Tickets for Community and GSoC Students

On 11/2/21 7:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 11/02/2021 00:20, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 10/2/21 4:20 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 08/02/2021 10:40, Chris Johns wrote: >>>>> It is written in Python 3.6. >>>> We still need to suppo

Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtems-debugger-target.c: Fix Coverity Dereference before null check

On 12/2/21 8:35 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 2:33 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 3:29 PM Chris Johns wrote: >>> >>> On 12/2/21 8:16 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 2

Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtems-debugger-target.c: Fix Coverity Dereference before null check

On 12/2/21 8:33 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 3:29 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 12/2/21 8:16 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 2:00 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>&

Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtems-debugger-target.c: Fix Coverity Dereference before null check

On 12/2/21 8:16 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 2:00 PM Chris Johns wrote: >> >> On 12/2/21 7:27 am, Ryan Long wrote: >>> Fixes CID #1468682 where target is dereferenced before it has been >>>

Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtems-debugger-target.c: Fix Coverity Dereference before null check

On 12/2/21 8:03 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, 3:00 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 12/2/21 7:27 am, Ryan Long wrote: > > Fixes CID #1468682 where target is dereferenced before it has been > > ch

Re: Revisiting Minimum with Static Allocation

On 12/2/21 1:17 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 3:04 AM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > > On 10/02/2021 21:36, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:57 AM Joel Sherrill

Re: [PATCH 3/4] rtems-debugger-threads.c: Fix Coverity Dereference before null check

On 12/2/21 7:27 am, Ryan Long wrote: > Fixes CID #1468681, 1468690, and 1468694 by checking if threads is null in > the rtems_debugger_thread_find_index, rtems_debugger_thread_system_resume, > and rtems_debugger_thread_continue_all functions. Looks good. Thanks Chris

Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtems-debugger-target.c: Fix Coverity Dereference before null check

On 12/2/21 7:27 am, Ryan Long wrote: > Fixes CID #1468682 where target is dereferenced before it has been > checked as to whether it is null or not in the > rtems_debugger_target_swbreak_control function. > --- > cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-target.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3

Re: Should we document a time zone for the RTEMS epoch?

On 11/2/21 7:25 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:56 AM Joel Sherrill > wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, 10:53 AM Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > On 10/02/2021 17:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: >

Re: Remaining Waf Conversion Tickets for Community and GSoC Students

21 at 11:20 PM Sebastian Huber > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: > >> On 08/02/2021 10:40, Chris Johns wrote: > > > > This brings up a discussion I have been having with Kinsey. He > submitted BSP > > variants for the aarch64 ilp32 and ip64

Re: Remaining Waf Conversion Tickets for Community and GSoC Students

On 11/2/21 10:07 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:00 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 11/2/21 2:36 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 10/02/2021 16:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > >> On

Re: Remaining Waf Conversion Tickets for Community and GSoC Students

On 10/2/21 4:20 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/02/2021 10:40, Chris Johns wrote: >>> It is written in Python 3.6. >> We still need to support python 2. Maybe having this file support both could >> be >> part of the project. > I think this BSP builder is a deve

Re: Remaining Waf Conversion Tickets for Community and GSoC Students

gt;> >>     > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:20 PM Sebastian Huber >>     > >     <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> >>     > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >>     <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>> wrote: >>

Re: About Doxygen builds

On 10/2/21 1:01 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Does anyone maintain the doxygen builds? > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:13 AM Richi Dubey wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In https://docs.rtems.org/doxygen/branches/master/group__ScoreSMP.html, >> there are only 0-7 bool options for SMP_Fatal_code, whereas I have

Re: test for rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate

On 10/2/21 4:12 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 09/02/2021 23:17, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 10/2/21 1:10 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 09/02/2021 14:59, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >>>>> sbrk() cannot be removed and we need to maintained and

Re: [PATCH 1/1] zynq-uart: Fix set_attributes implementation

On 10/2/21 10:21 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:08 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 9/2/21 11:42 pm, Jan Sommer wrote: > > From: Kinsey Moore <mailto:kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>> > > > >

Re: [PATCH] basedefs: Add stringification of argument lists

On 10/2/21 1:04 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Is there a sustainable plan for beyond the project lifetime (maybe, > something we need to discuss separately)? I am not aware of a plan. It is up to those wanting to benefit from the qualification effort to initiate this and to provide the support or

Re: [PATCH 1/1] zynq-uart: Fix set_attributes implementation

On 9/2/21 11:42 pm, Jan Sommer wrote: > From: Kinsey Moore > > The zynq-uart set_attributes implementation was configured to always > return false which causes spconsole01 to fail. This restores the > disabled implementation which sets the baud rate registers > appropriately and allows

Re: Standalone repository for libnetworking stack

On 6/2/21 10:17 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > Hello Christian, Joel, Chris, > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:41 PM Chris Johns wrote: >> >> On 6/2/21 8:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:54 PM Christian Mauderer >> <mailto:o...@c-maude

Re: test for rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate

On 10/2/21 1:10 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 09/02/2021 14:59, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >>> sbrk() cannot be removed and we need to maintained and test it as a BSP >>> level >>> interface. >>> >>> This is an nice design idea where the sbrk() pool of memory can be given >>> out to >>> the heap

Re: [PATCH] libcsupport: Add sbrk greedy support to consume all sbrk memory

system call >> + *  @ingroup MallocSupport >> + */ >> + >> +/* >> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Johns.  All rights reserved. >> + * >> + * The license and distribution terms for this file may be >> + * found in the file LICENSE in this distribution or at

Re: test for rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate

On 8/2/21 4:50 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > On 8/2/21 4:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 08/02/2021 06:14, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> >>> We already have a ticket for this: >>> >>> >>> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3982 > > Thanks. I

Re: [PATCH] libcsupport: Have greedy allocations use consume extended memory

On 9/2/21 8:09 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021, 3:00 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 9/2/21 12:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:44 AM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org&

Re: [RTEMS 5 PATCH] bsp/motorola_powerp: Print RTEMS_VERSION from the bootloader

On 9/2/21 5:18 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > If you put this on master/6, you can switch that align to use > RTEMS_ALIGN_UP(addr, PAGE_SIZE) -- not PAGE_MASK Sorry, I had already pushed the patch. A quick grep shows there are a few of these ... $ grep -r PAGE_MASK *

Re: [PATCH] libcsupport: Have greedy allocations use consume extended memory

On 9/2/21 12:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:44 AM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 8/2/21 5:38 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > > On 08/02/2021 07:30, chr...@rtems.org <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>

Re: Remaining Waf Conversion Tickets for Community and GSoC Students

On 8/2/21 5:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/02/2021 06:04, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 7/2/21 4:15 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> While potential GSoC students are becoming more familiar with RTEMS and the >>> community,, I wanted to p

Re: [PATCH] libcsupport: Have greedy allocations use consume extended memory

On 8/2/21 5:38 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 08/02/2021 07:30, chr...@rtems.org wrote: >> diff --git a/cpukit/libcsupport/src/rtems_heap_greedy.c >> b/cpukit/libcsupport/src/rtems_heap_greedy.c >> index 4dda39873f..2361f17d2e 100644 >> --- a/cpukit/libcsupport/src/rtems_heap_greedy.c >> +++

Re: test for rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate

On 8/2/21 5:12 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/02/2021 06:50, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> Another approach is to remove the greedy allocation functions and test the >>> no >>> memory conditions differently. We could wrap the allocator function and let

Re: test for rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate

On 8/2/21 4:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/02/2021 06:14, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >> We already have a ticket for this: >> >> >> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3982 Thanks. I am working on a solution. It is working but there is a small pause I think needs more investigation. >> I am not

Re: Remaining Waf Conversion Tickets for Community and GSoC Students

On 7/2/21 4:15 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > While potential GSoC students are becoming more familiar with RTEMS and the > community,, I wanted to pass along a few tickets that we would appreciate > having > resolved. > > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4124

Re: test for rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate

On 8/2/21 2:41 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > Hello, > > I see the call `rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate` is in `src/rtems` and > publicly > available via the installed header file `rtems/support.h`. Sorry the code is libcsupport. > Are there tests for this and similar support

test for rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate

Hello, I see the call `rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate` is in `src/rtems` and publicly available via the installed header file `rtems/support.h`. Are there tests for this and similar support calls? I ask because tests in rtems.git and rtems-libbsd.git testsuites depend on this call and it

Re: [RTEMS 5 PATCH v2] powerpc/shared: ISA bus bridge fails to enable the openpic irq

On 8/2/21 12:23 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021, 5:30 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 8/2/21 9:48 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Does this have a ticket for the 5 branch? :) > > Yes #4233. It is in the commit mes

Re: [RTEMS 5 PATCH v2] powerpc/shared: ISA bus bridge fails to enable the openpic irq

On 8/2/21 9:48 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Does this have a ticket for the 5 branch? :) Yes #4233. It is in the commit message. Chris > > Patch is ok otherwise. > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021, 4:45 PM mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> > wrote: > > From: Chris

Re: [RTEMS 5 PATCH] bsp/motorola_powerp: Print RTEMS_VERSION from the bootloader

On 8/2/21 9:48 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Do you want another ticket to apply this to 5 as well? This is for 5 and the ticket is ... > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021, 4:38 PM mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> > wrote: > > From: Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.or

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/shared: ISA bus bridge fails to enable the openpic irq

On 7/2/21 9:42 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > -  if ( currentBoard == MVME_2300 ) { > +  if ( currentBoard == MVME_2300 || currentBoard == > MVME_2600_2700_W_MVME761 ) { >      /* nothing to do for W83C553 bridge */ >      known_cpi_isa_bridge = 1; >    } > > I think the patch

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/shared: ISA bus bridge fails to enable the openpic irq

On 7/2/21 9:42 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021, 2:09 PM mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> > wrote: > > From: Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> > > - The call to enable the openpic irq for the ISA bridge falls >   because the IRQ used

Re: Standalone repository for libnetworking stack

On 6/2/21 8:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:54 PM Christian Mauderer > wrote: > > Hello Vijay, > > On 05/02/2021 19:41, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm currently working on separating the libnetworking

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On 3/2/21 3:13 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:40 AM Joel Sherrill <mailto:j...@rtems.org>> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:50 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > On 2/2/21 9:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >

Re: Porting ptpd to rtems

On 2/2/21 12:15 am, gabriel.moy...@dlr.de wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I hope you are doing well. I am and thank you for asking. > Last year I asked about running ptpd on RTEMS > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-September/062208.html >

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On 2/2/21 9:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:50 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > On 2/2/21 3:42 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > > > On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some te

Re: [PATCH] user: add guidance on version numbers to GSoC guide.

+1 On 2/2/21 7:51 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > --- > user/start/gsoc.rst | 6 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/user/start/gsoc.rst b/user/start/gsoc.rst > index 7f27d7b..f8167b9 100644 > --- a/user/start/gsoc.rst > +++ b/user/start/gsoc.rst > @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ delving

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On 2/2/21 3:42 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass most > of > the time but fail intermittently. It appears to be based somewhat on host load > but there may be other factors.  > > There does not appear to be a good test

Re: Buildbot failure in RTEMS on CHECK sparc/erc32 FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE GCC 7.3.0 POSIX

On 28/1/21 4:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > On 28/01/2021 06:37, build...@rtems.org wrote: >> The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder CHECK sparc/erc32 FreeBSD >> 10.1-STABLE GCC 7.3.0 POSIX while building rtems. >> Full details are available at: >>

Re: devel Digest, Vol 110, Issue 38

On 28/1/21 4:25 am, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 04:28:37 +1100 > From: Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> > To: devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org> > Subject: Re: [patch libBSD] dev/ofw: Use RTEMS OFW FDT impleme

Re: [patch libBSD] dev/ofw: Use RTEMS OFW FDT implementation

On 28/1/21 4:12 am, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > Hello Christian, > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Christian MAUDERER > > wrote: > > Hello Niteesh, > > I think there is an open Question from Chris for that patch: > >

Re: [PATCH] libcsupport: Add no_reg_make_node as a mount option to the mount table

On 27/1/21 2:43 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:02 AM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > On 25/01/2021 02:10, chr...@rtems.org wrote: > > > From: Chris Johnsmailto:chr...@rtems.org>> > > > > -

Re: [rtems commit] splinkersets01: Fix declaration

I think this patch has caused a regression in the pc686 PC ... /opt/work/chris/rtems/nfs/6/lib/gcc/i386-rtems6/10.2.1/../../../../i386-rtems6/bin/ld:

Re: [PATCH] Improve file header comment in generated files

Looks good. Thank you. Chris On 23/1/21 2:06 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > --- > cpukit/doxygen/appl-config.h| 10 +++--- > cpukit/include/rtems.h | 10 +++--- > cpukit/include/rtems/config.h | 10 +++--- >

Re: Phrases for CONSTRAINTS section in the directive documentation

On 23/1/21 12:19 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 5:55 AM Andrew Butterfield > mailto:andrew.butterfi...@scss.tcd.ie>> > wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > I'd prefer 2. > > The directive may be called from an interrupt context > > (substituting  "must",  "must not",

Re: Release notes generator?

On 22/1/21 5:49 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 21/01/2021 18:26, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 21/1/21 8:25 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> where can I find the release notes generator which produced for example: >>> >>> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/rel

Re: [patch libBSD] dev/ofw: Use RTEMS OFW FDT implementation

On 20/1/21 7:31 pm, G S Niteesh Babu wrote: > This commit modifies the OFW interface to the RTEMS FDT > implementation instead of the default FreeBSD. Which branch? Is this patch dependent on the changes to rtems.git? Are the kernel versions of the functions built for all bsps? Which BSPs have

Re: Release notes generator?

On 21/1/21 8:25 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > where can I find the release notes generator which produced for example: > > https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/5/5.1/rtems-5.1-release-notes.pdf > > I looked a bit around in rtems-tools and rtems-release, but didn't find > anything. >

Re: [PATCH] Improve file header comment in generated files

On 21/1/21 10:23 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:01 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 19/1/21 5:01 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > diff --git a/c-user/config/bdbuf.rst b/c-user/config/bdbuf.rst > >

Re: Add "CONSTRAINTS" section do directive documentation?

On 21/1/21 6:28 am, Peter Dufault wrote: > Totally agree. > >> On Jan 20, 2021, at 10:58 , Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> I think this seems reasonable. >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:48 AM Sebastian Huber >> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to add a "CONSTRAINTS" section to the directive >>

Re: gdb on CentOS was Re: Fwd: [rtems-source-builder commit] 6/7: Update unstable RTEMS 6/7 tool chain

On 21/1/21 3:40 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:20 PM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > > On 17/01/2021 21:23, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > Does this fix the build failure for what looks to be all 6 toolchains > > over the

Re: [PATCH] Improve file header comment in generated files

On 19/1/21 5:01 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > diff --git a/c-user/config/bdbuf.rst b/c-user/config/bdbuf.rst > index 06399e0..5a3360f 100644 > --- a/c-user/config/bdbuf.rst > +++ b/c-user/config/bdbuf.rst > @@ -8,11 +8,15 @@ > .. worded better please post a report or patch to an RTEMS mailing list

Re: [rtems-tools commit] tester: Swap Xilinx ZynqMP BSPs to secondary UART

On 16/1/21 1:46 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > This change only applies to the aarch64 variants since they're brand new and > I didn't want to disturb existing users of the ARM/Xilinx-Zynq and > ARM/Xilinx-ZynqMP BSPs. Sure. I am wondering if the change works on FreeBSD because my testing on other

Re: [PATCH] eng: Add design group requirement item type

On 15/1/21 4:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/01/2021 04:31, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 14/1/21 4:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 14/01/2021 03:34, Chris Johns wrote: >>> >>>> On 13/1/21 9:40 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:

Re: [PATCH] eng: Add design group requirement item type

On 14/1/21 4:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 14/01/2021 03:34, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 13/1/21 9:40 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> +Design Group Requirement Item Type >>> +^^ >>> + >>> +This type refines th

Re: [rtems-docs commit] c-user: Generate Timer Manager documentation

On 15/1/21 6:20 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:26 PM Sebastian Huber > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> > wrote: > > On 11/12/2020 01:35, Chris Johns wrote: > > > On 10/12/20 4:41 pm, Sebastian Huber wro

Re: [rtems-tools commit] tester: Swap Xilinx ZynqMP BSPs to secondary UART

On 15/1/21 6:33 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Module:rtems-tools > Branch:master > Commit:4da011424c92f76ffa06f8a01f92861875806056 > Changeset: > http://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/commit/?id=4da011424c92f76ffa06f8a01f92861875806056 > > Author:Kinsey Moore > Date: Thu Jan 14

Re: [PATCH] eng: Add design group requirement item type

On 13/1/21 9:40 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > +Design Group Requirement Item Type > +^^ > + > +This type refines the :ref:`SpecTypeNonFunctionalRequirementItemType` through > +the ``non-functional-type`` attribute if the value is ``design-group``. This > +set of

Re: [PATCH] This patch adds support for a STM32H7 variation

On 9/1/21 7:49 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/01/2021 15:30, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 6:58 AM Robin Müller > > wrote: >> >> Are they really 12 BSPs or just build variants of this one BSP family? >> >> If just variants, I have come full

Re: [rtems-docs commit] c-user: Generate Timer Manager documentation

On 13/1/21 9:45 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 11/12/2020 01:35, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 10/12/20 4:41 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 10/12/2020 03:24, Chris Johns wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/12/20 7:20 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>>> M

Re: [PATCH] cpukit: Merge FreeBSD values for the priorities

On 24/12/20 9:20 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > This looks ok if these priorities are mapped to Classic or Score. POSIX thread > priorities run opposite. The priorities I have added in are replacing are all 0 ... > -/* Dummy values to make the libbsd happy */ > -#define        PRI_MAX_ITHD   

Re: [rtems-bsp-builder] 2020-12-21 07:39:31: Profile(s): everything

> On 23 Dec 2020, at 5:31 am, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 22/12/2020 18:54, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, 10:28 AM Sebastian Huber >> > > wrote: >> >>On 22/12/2020 17:00, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> >>>

Re: microzed board boot from a sd card

Hi Xiaomin, Welcome to RTEMS. On 16/12/20 6:08 am, Xiaomin (Jasmine) wrote: > Hi, there, > > I followed this article: > > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Boards/Zynq%20-%20Zedboard > > > for development. It basically gets the boot img

Re: Oddity with address recorded for gcc instrumentation on ARM

On 19/12/20 7:56 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > If you build the RTEMS tools with the LLVM development package you get the > function name and line information in the trace. Is there a wrote up or walk through on how to do this? Thanks Chris ___ devel

Re: [PATCH v2] eng: Requirements counting shall start at zero

On 14/12/20 6:20 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 14/12/2020 07:31, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> On 11/12/2020 17:43, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>>     If renaming them introduces challenges, then we should explicitly >>>     use -0 for the first requirement always, and not allow unnumbered >>>    

Re: [PATCH 1/3] expat: Disable shared libraries

On 21/12/20 5:14 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > This should ensure that GDB is linked using the static libexpat.a built > by the RSB. OK to push. Thank you for working through this. It is often not easy getting all the pieces to align. Chris ___ devel

Re: [PATCH] Add GMP as a prerequisite for GDB

On 21/12/20 5:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/12/2020 04:59, Chris Johns wrote: >> Why is xgcc now dependent on a share libgmp? A FreeBSD gcc does not show any >> shared library dependencies other than the standard OS ones. What happens if >> you >> configure th

Re: MSYS2 build: header file missing

On 19/12/20 9:51 pm, Robin Müller wrote: > Thanks for the quick fix. I was able to build sparc-rtems6 on the Windows > machine with the fix. Thank you for letting us know. > So basically, arm-rtesm6 is still problematic because of the missing headers > (but worked on Linux using Canadian Cross

<    11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   >