On 24/10/15 02:12, Chris Johns wrote:
On 22/10/2015 6:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 22/10/15 09:00, Chris Johns wrote:
In the mean time could linker sets be used in drivers or BSPs to declare
a table of "resources" they need and these are added to the confdefs.h
defined values during
On 22/10/2015 6:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 22/10/15 09:00, Chris Johns wrote:
>> In the mean time could linker sets be used in drivers or BSPs to declare
>> a table of "resources" they need and these are added to the confdefs.h
>> defined values during initialisation?
>
> Yes, this would
On 22/10/15 09:00, Chris Johns wrote:
In the mean time could linker sets be used in drivers or BSPs to declare
a table of "resources" they need and these are added to the confdefs.h
defined values during initialisation?
Yes, this would probably work. You should however compare the complexity
On 22/10/2015 4:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> With "would be" I meant that it is technically possible. There is some
> work necessary to actually use it. My approach would be to move the
> FreeBSD synchronization objects from libbsd to RTEMS, since they offer
> the best designed APIs.
That is a
On 10/22/2015 9:42 AM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/22/2015 10:30 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/22/2015 8:55 AM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/22/2015 01:33 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 21:53, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Hi Devel,
I looked for a while, but couldn't find a way
On 10/22/2015 10:30 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/22/2015 8:55 AM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/22/2015 01:33 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 21:53, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Hi Devel,
I looked for a while, but couldn't find a way to specify what resources
(semaphores, tasks,
On 22/10/15 07:37, Chris Johns wrote:
On 22/10/2015 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>
>On 21/10/15 21:53, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
>>Hi Devel,
>>
>>I looked for a while, but couldn't find a way to specify what
>>resources (semaphores, tasks, etc) a BSP requires for an empty project
>>(empty
On 22/10/2015 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>
> On 21/10/15 21:53, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
>> Hi Devel,
>>
>> I looked for a while, but couldn't find a way to specify what
>> resources (semaphores, tasks, etc) a BSP requires for an empty project
>> (empty Init function).
>
> There is no
On 22/10/2015 4:41 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> If you use C11, C++11, libgomp or libbsd synchronization objects, then
> the storage space for them is provided by the user and not the workspace.
>
Typically drivers in BSPs have used documented APIs. Is this approach
and support documented and
On 21/10/15 21:53, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Hi Devel,
I looked for a while, but couldn't find a way to specify what
resources (semaphores, tasks, etc) a BSP requires for an empty project
(empty Init function).
There is no useful support for this and this is a constant source of
problems.
On 10/21/2015 2:53 PM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Hi Devel,
I looked for a while, but couldn't find a way to specify what resources
(semaphores, tasks,
etc) a BSP requires for an empty project (empty Init function).
I took a look at this page:
Hi Devel,
I looked for a while, but couldn't find a way to specify what resources (semaphores, tasks,
etc) a BSP requires for an empty project (empty Init function).
I took a look at this page:
Let me clarify. I don't think I explained my predicament very well.
None of the tests will run because the base application for our BSP requires resources that
aren't available.
On the application side we're fine.
We have a couple of applications running correctly, by specifying
13 matches
Mail list logo
