Re: [PATCH 1/2] bsps/riscv: Remove inaccurate statement about reliance on a boot loader

2022-10-31 Thread Chris Johns
On 31/10/2022 10:44 pm, Hesham Almatary wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to push that but got an error message: > "remote: git_buildbot: ERROR: Could not connect to > buildbot.int.rtems.org:9899: Connection was refused by other side: 61: > Connection refused." Please try again. We have had some

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bsps/riscv: Remove inaccurate statement about reliance on a boot loader

2022-10-31 Thread Hesham Almatary
Hello, I tried to push that but got an error message: "remote: git_buildbot: ERROR: Could not connect to buildbot.int.rtems.org:9899: Connection was refused by other side: 61: Connection refused." Please push if you're happy with the patch. Cheers, Hesham On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 19:04, Hesham

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bsps/riscv: Remove inaccurate statement about reliance on a boot loader

2022-10-25 Thread Hesham Almatary
On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 18:59, Alan Cudmore wrote: > > I agree – I am working on a riscv BSP variant (Sipeed MAIX Bit with K210 CPU) > where the RTEMS image can be flashed directly to the board and boots without > a bootloader. > > I was also wondering if the statement “Each variant corresponds

RE: [PATCH 1/2] bsps/riscv: Remove inaccurate statement about reliance on a boot loader

2022-10-25 Thread Alan Cudmore
I agree – I am working on a riscv BSP variant (Sipeed MAIX Bit with K210 CPU) where the RTEMS image can be flashed directly to the board and boots without a bootloader.I was also wondering if the statement “Each variant corresponds to a GCC multilib” is still accurate as BSP variants such as the