Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On 3/7/2023 5:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 03.07.23 01:17, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 30/6/2023 4:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the >>> tool >>> versions for the release. >>> >>> For GCC, my preferred ch

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On 03.07.23 01:17, Chris Johns wrote: On 30/6/2023 4:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the tool versions for the release. For GCC, my preferred choice would be GCC 13.2: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-June/24

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On 30.06.23 22:50, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:20 PM Sam Price > wrote: How hard are the microblaze patches going to be to apply? Alex is out today but the Microblaze gcc and binutils are based off versions Xilinx has patches for. Right n

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On 30.06.23 18:57, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: Hello, it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the tool versions for the release. For GCC, my preferre

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On 30.06.23 19:18, Kinsey Moore wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:58 AM Joel Sherrill > wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: Hello, it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting cl

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On 30/6/2023 4:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the > tool > versions for the release. > > For GCC, my preferred choice would be GCC 13.2: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-June/241838.html > > In GCC 12

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:20 PM Sam Price wrote: > How hard are the microblaze patches going to be to apply? > Alex is out today but the Microblaze gcc and binutils are based off versions Xilinx has patches for. Right now, the microblaze is using this. tools/rtems-xilinx-binutils-2.36 tools/rt

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

How hard are the microblaze patches going to be to apply? On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:19 PM Kinsey Moore wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:58 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>>

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:58 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about >> the tool versions for the release. >> >> For GCC,

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about > the tool versions for the release. > > For GCC, my preferred choice would be GCC 13.2: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

Hello Karel, On 30.06.23 11:40, Karel Gardas wrote: so what is the best way to test GCC 13.2 with RTEMS 6? Is ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix= --with-rtems-gcc=tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head 6/rtems-all canonical way how to build those tools for RTEMS 6? Or is there some trickery

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

Hello Sebastian, so what is the best way to test GCC 13.2 with RTEMS 6? Is ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix= --with-rtems-gcc=tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head 6/rtems-all canonical way how to build those tools for RTEMS 6? Or is there some trickery involved I do not see yet? Thank