Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-07-03 Thread Chris Johns
On 3/7/2023 5:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 03.07.23 01:17, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 30/6/2023 4:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the >>> tool >>> versions for the release. >>> >>> For GCC, my preferred

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-07-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 03.07.23 01:17, Chris Johns wrote: On 30/6/2023 4:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the tool versions for the release. For GCC, my preferred choice would be GCC 13.2:

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-07-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 30.06.23 22:50, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:20 PM Sam Price > wrote: How hard are the microblaze patches going to be to apply? Alex is out today but the Microblaze gcc and binutils are based off versions Xilinx has patches for. Right

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-07-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 30.06.23 18:57, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: Hello, it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the tool versions for the release. For GCC, my

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-07-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 30.06.23 19:18, Kinsey Moore wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:58 AM Joel Sherrill > wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: Hello, it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-07-02 Thread Chris Johns
On 30/6/2023 4:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the > tool > versions for the release. > > For GCC, my preferred choice would be GCC 13.2: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-June/241838.html > > In GCC

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-06-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:20 PM Sam Price wrote: > How hard are the microblaze patches going to be to apply? > Alex is out today but the Microblaze gcc and binutils are based off versions Xilinx has patches for. Right now, the microblaze is using this. tools/rtems-xilinx-binutils-2.36

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-06-30 Thread Sam Price
How hard are the microblaze patches going to be to apply? On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:19 PM Kinsey Moore wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:58 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>>

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-06-30 Thread Kinsey Moore
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:58 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about >> the tool versions for the release. >> >> For

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-06-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about > the tool versions for the release. > > For GCC, my preferred choice would be GCC 13.2: > >

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-06-30 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Karel, On 30.06.23 11:40, Karel Gardas wrote: so what is the best way to test GCC 13.2 with RTEMS 6? Is ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix= --with-rtems-gcc=tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head 6/rtems-all canonical way how to build those tools for RTEMS 6? Or is there some

Re: Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-06-30 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello Sebastian, so what is the best way to test GCC 13.2 with RTEMS 6? Is ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix= --with-rtems-gcc=tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head 6/rtems-all canonical way how to build those tools for RTEMS 6? Or is there some trickery involved I do not see yet?

Tool versions for RTEMS 6.1 release?

2023-06-30 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, it seems the RTEMS 6.1 release is getting closer. We should think about the tool versions for the release. For GCC, my preferred choice would be GCC 13.2: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-June/241838.html In GCC 12 a big change was enabling the vectorization support with -O2.