Re: style patches - discuss

2023-12-19 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 12:19 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello, > > it seems we still have no tool and configuration to get satisfying > results when applied to existing RTEMS source files. May I suggest a > more pragmatic approach which focuses on new files. Would it be an > option to simply us

Re: style patches - discuss

2023-12-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, it seems we still have no tool and configuration to get satisfying results when applied to existing RTEMS source files. May I suggest a more pragmatic approach which focuses on new files. Would it be an option to simply use automatic formatting for all new files specifically written fo

Re: style patches - discuss

2023-07-27 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 1:13 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 26.07.23 17:17, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:15 PM Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > >> > >> On 25.07.23 23:41, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >>> I have sent two initial patches to begin t

Re: style patches - discuss

2023-07-26 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 26.07.23 17:17, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:15 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: On 25.07.23 23:41, Gedare Bloom wrote: I have sent two initial patches to begin the style reformat. The clang-format file is not quite 100%, and it's also not usable by anyone else (as I wait for

Re: style patches - discuss

2023-07-26 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:15 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 25.07.23 23:41, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > I have sent two initial patches to begin the style reformat. The > > clang-format file is not quite 100%, and it's also not usable by > > anyone else (as I wait for changes to be accepted upstrea

Re: style patches - discuss

2023-07-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 25.07.23 23:41, Gedare Bloom wrote: I have sent two initial patches to begin the style reformat. The clang-format file is not quite 100%, and it's also not usable by anyone else (as I wait for changes to be accepted upstream). A few things to note: * We can always manually override style with

Re: style patches - discuss

2023-07-25 Thread Gedare Bloom
https://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/log/?h=aarch64-reformat https://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/log/?h=arm-reformat On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 3:56 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 26/7/2023 7:41 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > I have sent two initial patches to begin the style reformat. The > > clang

Re: style patches - discuss

2023-07-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/7/2023 7:41 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > I have sent two initial patches to begin the style reformat. The > clang-format file is not quite 100%, and it's also not usable by > anyone else (as I wait for changes to be accepted upstream). > > A few things to note: > * We can always manually overri

style patches - discuss

2023-07-25 Thread Gedare Bloom
I have sent two initial patches to begin the style reformat. The clang-format file is not quite 100%, and it's also not usable by anyone else (as I wait for changes to be accepted upstream). A few things to note: * We can always manually override style with good reason. If you see something like t