Hi Markus,
That's good to hear. I'll be glad to read through your docs when I
have some time.
MK> So the question I'd like to ask here is, can someone provide us with a
MK> few pointers to get started with understanding how a SunRay driver could/
MK> should possibly interface with the XFree86 X
Hi,
Well, replying my own mail, for the record, it appears that I was
missing
Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
>From the XF86Config
Dunno why it works before though. It works fine now anyway.
Cheers,
Olivier.
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 23:09, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Dunno if
Hi,
here is a fix for the hang described in the subject line. I have
difficulties to make a simple reproducer program, from source code
inspection is it clear enough that the UnlockDisplay is required at the end
of the XkbGetMapChanges ?
Thanks
Jose Luu
*** xc/lib/X11/XKBGetMap.c Mon Feb 3 17
| From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:42:35AM -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
| > Demo of bug:
| >
| > - in an xterm running a shell, type: echo -e '\033[?1001h'
| > - click in the window
| >
| > xterm now locks up (this is documented in ctlseqs.ms) and eats al
It's not there anymore.
Mark.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:33:11PM -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> | On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:42:35AM -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
>
> | > Demo of bug:
> | >
> | > - in an xterm running a shell, type: echo -e '\033[?1001h'
> | > - click in t
Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>
>
>It's not there anymore.
>
> Mark.
Seems to be there now, temporary problem?
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/
--
Kevin
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinf
Mark,
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/
Works for me... or are you talking about the devel-only cvsweb?
Harold
Mark Vojkovich wrote:
It's not there anymore.
Mark.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/de
Mark,
For that matter, the devel-only one works for me too.
I hope that helps...
Harold
Mark Vojkovich wrote:
It's not there anymore.
Mark.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_
It seems that Xcursor.h is installed in
/usr/include/X11/Xcursor/Xcursor.h in 4.2.99.4. Is this intentional?
Why isn't it directly in X11?
--
Kevin
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Around 19 o'clock on Feb 3, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> It seems that Xcursor.h is installed in
> /usr/include/X11/Xcursor/Xcursor.h in 4.2.99.4. Is this intentional?
> Why isn't it directly in X11?
Many libraries create separate directories for their include files, and
so I just followed this conv
| From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| I just tried again, but still no runaway. But it's a couple years old:
|
| Linux bloatware 2.2.16 #8 SMP Fri Dec 8 18:02:22 EST 2000 i686 unknown
|
| -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1013224 Mar 21 2000 libc-2.1.3.so
|
| (I recall seeing some discu
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:59:49PM -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> Might be worth doing an strace. On RHL8.0, I get:
>
> select(5, [3 4], [], NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {0, 0})
> select(4, [3], [], [], {0, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {0, 0})
> select(4, [3], [], [], {0, 0})
| From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| hmm - running on Slackware 7.1, I don't see any CPU load.
A friend just confirmed this problem (100% cpu) on his Slackware 7.1.0
system. strace says:
select(5, [3 4], [], NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {0, 0})
select(4, [3], [], [], {0, 0})
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:44:22PM -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> | hmm - running on Slackware 7.1, I don't see any CPU load.
>
> A friend just confirmed this problem (100% cpu) on his Slackware 7.1.0
> system. strace says:
>
> select(5, [3 4],
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:04:12PM +0900, Jens Petersen wrote:
>With current cvs, the Alt and Meta modifiers aren't defined
>for Japanese keyboards, and further Ctrl-Alt-Fn doesn't
>work. For Japanese users this is a bit of a showstopper for
>4.3 IMHO. I have a feeling this also affects other non
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:50:51PM +0100, Jose Luu wrote:
>Hi,
>
>here is a fix for the hang described in the subject line. I have
>difficulties to make a simple reproducer program, from source code
>inspection is it clear enough that the UnlockDisplay is required at the end
>of the XkbGetMapChange
| From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: xterm can hang, CPU bound
|
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:59:49PM -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
| > Might be worth doing an strace. On RHL8.0, I get:
| >
| > select(5, [3 4], [], NULL
With my attempts at theming Xcursor I have run into a deadlock. No
matter what themes I use or create, none of them correctly change
left_ptr_watch. Instead, the theme will default onto the left_ptr_watch
from whiteglass.
I did notice that in xc/lib/Xcursor/library.c that left_ptr_watch seems
to
Is there anywhere in the X source code that *gasp* uses ANSI
trigraphs and relies on this broken^Wwonderful feature of ANSI C
being enabled? ;o)
I ask because I just discovered that by default trigraphs are
enabled in the sources. I patch I am applying contains the
string "(???)" which is ho
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:12:22AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Is there anywhere in the X source code that *gasp* uses ANSI
> trigraphs and relies on this broken^Wwonderful feature of ANSI C
> being enabled? ;o)
>
> I ask because I just discovered that by default trigraphs are
> enabled in
Around 0 o'clock on Feb 4, "Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> Is there anywhere in the X source code that *gasp* uses ANSI
> trigraphs and relies on this broken^Wwonderful feature of ANSI C
> being enabled? ;o)
I sure hope not. I've certainly never seen any such code (and would have
fixed it if I had
- Original Message -
From: "Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "hy0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [XFree86] 4.2.99.4 no display, locked
keyboard(Radeon7500Mobility)
> On Son, 2003-02-02 at 12:51,
23 matches
Mail list logo