On 27 Aug 2003, John Dennis wrote:
>
> Mark, is there a hardware engineer at nvidia that would be familar with
> the VGA timing? Is it possible your VGA is running near or beyond the
> limits of the PCI timing requirements? My understanding is the ZX1 is a
> very aggressive chipset tuned for high
Hi!
I'm using Debian woody(unstable version) and I'm trying to install XFree86
4.3. I downloaded Xinstall.sh and run:
# sh Xinstall sh -check
Checking which OS you're running...
uname reports 'Linux' version '2.4.18', architecture 'i686'
Object format is 'ELF'. libc version is '6.3.2' (6.3).
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 06:15, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Appearantly there are still issues with VGA framebuffer and emulated
> PIO register writes when saving and restoring fonts. These problems
> only affect certain cards (so far I've only heared of Nvidia cards).
> Mark Vojkovich is sure that these are
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> please please please PLEASE! accelerate everythig you can :)
>
> http://www.rasterman.com/files/render_bench.tar.gz
Is it correct to assume, that the image I see over a rainbow-like
background is the result of RENDER, and over a grey-shaded background
fr
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 19:52, Bryan W. Headley wrote:
> Claus Matthiesen wrote:
> > Weee! Device interface designing is fun!
> >
> > As a side note - isn't it rater a failure of the extended input thingy
> > in X when neither the application programmer nor the device driver
> > programmer think it'
Claus Matthiesen wrote:
Weee! Device interface designing is fun!
As a side note - isn't it rater a failure of the extended input thingy
in X when neither the application programmer nor the device driver
programmer think it's good enough?
La la la la. I can't read you :-)
--
.:.
Weee! Device interface designing is fun!
As a side note - isn't it rater a failure of the extended input thingy
in X when neither the application programmer nor the device driver
programmer think it's good enough?
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 17:03, Bryan W. Headley wrote:
> Claus Matthiesen wrote:
> >
Claus Matthiesen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Bryan W. Headley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: XInput: The device type in XListInputDevices comes up again...
> The problem is, there's a type field and a name field. The
Bryan W. Headley writes:
> Egbert Eich wrote:
> > That is correct. However Claus was talking about the future - once
> > that is fixed. Appearantly toolkits like gnome already do make use
> > of the name field.
>
> Sure, albeit dangerously. They had best not be making decisions based on
>
- Original Message -
From: "Bryan W. Headley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: XInput: The device type in XListInputDevices comes up again...
> > > The problem is, there's a type field and a name field. They're not
> > > p
John Dennis writes:
>
> I will confess my understanding is weak when it comes to low level bus
> interactions, but I'm learning more eveytime I have to tackle these
> issues ;-)
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought things like caching and
> write-combining are not properties of the P
Hi John,
thanks on following up on this.
John Dennis writes:
>
> Anytime in the XServer when MMIO was specified as a mapping flag the
> ia64 code would have requested non-cached, this is done for all register
> mappings and the VGA framebuffer (because write combining was avoided on
> banke
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> please please please PLEASE! accelerate everythig you can :)
>
> http://www.rasterman.com/files/render_bench.tar.gz
> http://www.rasterman.com/files/imlib2-1.1.0.tar.gz
> this might be handy for you as a way of 1. measuring correctness (well so it
> "look
> There's a bug there that's resulting in them being ignored. The fix is
> attached, and I'll commit it tonight.
Thanks a bunch it works now, after being built with that patch.
> It might be possible to work around it by removing the input devices
> from the Layout section and instead specifying
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:01:32AM +1000, Andrew Bevitt wrote:
>Hi
>
>Im working on trying to get the latest snapshot to work after compilation,
>I have updated to total cvs and still experience the same problem.
>
>It seems that update 397 (see below) has made the user incapable of
>specifying wh
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:50:46 +0200 Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Since I recently found out that SiS hardware _does_ support per-pixel
> alpha-blended bitblits, I could finish the (yet disabled) render
> acceleration.
>
> The only problem I encountered:
16 matches
Mail list logo
