On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:23:38PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
[glibc search order]
> That possibly means that we should be removing -rpath from other platforms
> rather than adding it on Linux.
No, please don't do that.
On NetBSD you can't use LD_LIBRARY_PATH for setuid or setgid programs
and /usr
Title: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, 24 January 2004
ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT
SECURITY?
If you are like most people
the answer is YES!
It is impossible not to listen
to a news article on security, threats and/or terrorism.
Breach is a company soon to
la
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:50:29PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
>David Dawes wrote:
>
>> What is the correct typedef for PFNGLXGETUSTPROC? glxclient.h has:
>>
>> typedef int (* PFNGLXGETUSTPROC) ( int64_t * ust );
>>
>> and it is used as a signed quantity in glxcmds.c.
>>
>> But most drivers use
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:43:13AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>Marc Aurele La France wrote (in a message from Wednesday 21)
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:46:25PM +0900, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
> >
> > > >There are a lot of source files that have
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:23:46PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:46:25PM +0900, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
>
>> >There are a lot of source files that have wrong exec bits set in the
>> >repository. Although this is not a prob
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:16:08PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:43:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
>> So long as ld.so.conf overrides the rpath (does it?) then this won't
>> matter. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD won't work for setuid apps.
>
>It doesn't.
>Searching for l
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:19:45AM -0800, Craig Groeschel wrote:
>> Does anyone have a good reason to not do this?
>
>I seem to remember an "rpath considered harmful" message from
>around the time the libraries changed from R5 to R6. The
>author said to use rpath-link instead of rpath. I don't kn
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:43:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
> So long as ld.so.conf overrides the rpath (does it?) then this won't
> matter. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD won't work for setuid apps.
It doesn't.
Searching for libraries is done in glibc the following order:
DT_RPATH directories (
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:34:17PM +0100, Gian Filippo Pinzari wrote:
>David Dawes wrote:
>> I don't have any objections to doing this on Linux. As I said, we
>> already do it on a range of other platforms and I'm not sure why
>> Linux is something of an exception in this regard. Does anyone
>> h
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:06:50PM +0600, Ivan Pascal wrote:
> Hello,
>
>Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
>>
>> > >Tests for XChangeKeyboardControl
>> > >Test 9: FAIL
>> > >Test 10: FAIL
>> >
>> > That has been showing up for a while. It should be followed u
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:28:27PM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
>
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:53:06PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
>> >
>> >Someone needs to track down the bug that causes a server crash and
>> >subsequent lockup if a dualhead config is used but mga_hal is not
>> >available (either not
"devel" is the principle development list for XFree86, but I
suspect that most 3D developement discussion takes place on the
DRI project's lists.
Mark.
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Brad Arant wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a Linux developer and have actively been involved with the XFree X
There are various news items going around claiming that X.Org and The
XFree86 Project have joined together as a single group.
This is 100% untrue.
The XFree86 Project remains as an independent organisation, both legally
and operationally, and has not even considered combining with X.Org,
let alon
--- Brad Arant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a Linux developer and have actively been involved with the XFree
> X
> Windowing System. Would like to be a part of the developer's list and
> was
> wondering where the newsgroups and other conversations are actively
> taking
> place.
de
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:51:24AM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> >>I don't understand the Debian policy but it would be nice if at least 4.3.0 was
> >>included in their release of sarge as stable next month
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
>>I don't understand the Debian policy but it would be nice if at least 4.3.0 was
>>included in their release of sarge as stable next month.
>
>
> A debian/sarge release next month would most assuredly be premat
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Anyway, what's this user's easiest path to 4.3?
> Install the experimental package (if he runs sarge or unstable already),
> if he runs woody, the best guess would be Michel Daenzer's dri-trunk
> packages :
> # Michel's DRI packages
> deb http://pe
Hello.
There is such task: I need to grab all mouse and keyboard events on some screen, do
something after each event, and generate that events back to applications.
I try to do it like follows:
At first I grab mouse, remove first event from the queue, (here I must do smth.),
ungrab the pointe
simply get the corresponding libtermcap for ur arch and put it in proper lib dir in
ur LD_LIBRARY_PATH
-Jassi
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote :
>Dear Friends,
>
>I build Xfree86 TinyX for new architecture Abacus,
>Now I am facing problem while installing(make install)
>
>I requ
CATEGORY B WINNER WINNING NOTICE!
KP6821873DL
It is our pleasure to inform you that you have emerged
as a Category "B" winner of the Spanish International
Lotto. CONGRATULATIONS! You are entitled to a prize
sum of US$2,500,000.00. Reference number for your
prize is KP7021993DL; ticket number A/04-
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, [iso-8859-1] Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote:
> I think termcap should be ported. I am using
> uClibc-0.9.19
termcap (or ncurses) would be one of your system libraries, and is not
part of XFree86.
> I didn't faced any problem during compilation.
>
> why Xfree86 never prompted f
Dear Friends,
I build Xfree86 TinyX for new architecture Abacus,
Now I am facing problem while installing(make install)
I request your help on the following problem.
privously 'make install' failed telling 'cannot find
-lfl'
I ported flex and cleared that problem
Now install failed
/usr/abacu
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:00:35PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Michael Taylor wrote:
>
> > Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > > This came up while helping some clueless Windows exile(e):
>
> > > So, how come Debian "stable" is still at XFree86 4.1?
>
> > Because that
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
> Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > This came up while helping some clueless Windows exile(e):
> >
> > So, how come Debian "stable" is still at XFree86 4.1?
>
> Because that is what they had in 'testing' when they released Debian 3.0r
Hello,
I am a Linux developer and have actively been involved with the XFree X
Windowing System. Would like to be a part of the developer's list and was
wondering where the newsgroups and other conversations are actively taking
place.
Let me know what I can do for you.
__
Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote (in a message from Friday 23)
> Dear Friends,
>
> I am encountering the following error while Installing
> the build of XFree86 TinyX.
> I cross compiled X with Abacus compiler (India build
> processor)
>
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/home/suresh/xfree/b
26 matches
Mail list logo
