Please, keep the profanity down. Re: Dealing with images (Filter 20311056)

2003-12-08 Thread Raymond Jennings
kandianis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dealing with images Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 19:13:54 -0500 On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:52:50 -0800, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mark kandianis wrote: that's shit. I really think that's got the cart

Dealing with images

2003-12-07 Thread Gian Filippo Pinzari
Hi all, I posted the following message to the Xouvert list. I know that cross-posting to different lists is not generally a good idea, but I maybe somebody might be interested in this. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Dealing with images Date: Sunday 07 December 2003 16:39

Re: Dealing with images

2003-12-07 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
lists is not generally a good idea, but I maybe somebody might be interested in this. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Dealing with images Date: Sunday 07 December 2003 16:39 From: Gian Filippo Pinzari [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: General discussion about the Xouvert X server [EMAIL

Re: Dealing with images

2003-12-07 Thread mark kandianis
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 12:15:07 -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It'll take more than advocacy to make it a standard. I don't need to tell you, I'm certain, that in Open Source software the best way to make things happen is to do them. To be a Standard though, you need to write

Re: Dealing with images

2003-12-07 Thread Alan Coopersmith
mark kandianis wrote: that's shit. I really think that's got the cart in front of the horse. I don't see the market leader(s) doing that, to make something saddled to a standards group is a reminder of why LINUX beat FreeBSD. Standards are what allow Linux to have had even a chance to be here

Re: Dealing with images

2003-12-07 Thread mark kandianis
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 12:15:07 -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It'll take more than advocacy to make it a standard. I don't need to tell you, I'm certain, that in Open Source software the best way to make things happen is to do them. To be a Standard though, you need to write

Re: Dealing with images

2003-12-07 Thread mark kandianis
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:52:50 -0800, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mark kandianis wrote: that's shit. I really think that's got the cart in front of the horse. I don't see the market leader(s) doing that, to make something saddled to a standards group is a reminder of why LINUX beat

Re: Dealing with images

2003-12-07 Thread Alan Coopersmith
mark kandianis wrote: and as for pOSIX and linux, linux is not limited by the pOSIX standard, it makes the standard by doing it making it happen. i've seen LINUX move beyond and do things that posix has yet to endorse but does so it can be LINUX aware. All interesting OS'es have extensions

Re: Dealing with images

2003-12-07 Thread Gian Filippo Pinzari
Hi Kaleb, On Sunday 07 December 2003 18:15, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: To be a Standard though, you need to write a specification and have it go through X.org's standardization process. A proof of concept, in the form of an implementation, is useful too. We have the proof of concept. Should we