On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:04:19PM +0200, Wouter Bijlsma wrote:
> > In general, reverse engineering drivers tends to irritate hardware
> > companies. Since we want to maintain good working relationships with
> > these companies, so that they will give us documentation and sample
> > boards, we'
--- Wouter Bijlsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's a pity the DRI folks don't have access to the hardware. I do.
> But I'm not a driver developer (though I'm quite skilled in C,
> assembler and graphics code). Would it be a bad thing for me to try
> and find out if the existing 7000 driver can
On Mon, 09 Jun 2003 08:06:42 -0700
Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouter Bijlsma wrote:
> > I already posted this to the DRI devel mailing list, but perhaps someone here
> > knows more about it.
>
> In general, reverse engineering drivers tends to irritate hardware
> companies. Sin
Wouter Bijlsma wrote:
I already posted this to the DRI devel mailing list, but perhaps someone here knows more about it.
In general, reverse engineering drivers tends to irritate hardware
companies. Since we want to maintain good working relationships with
these companies, so that they will giv
I already posted this to the DRI devel mailing
list, but perhaps someone here knows more about it.
- Original Message -
From: Wouter
Bijlsma
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 5:40 PM
Subject: Reverse engineering Windows Radeon IGP320/340
driver?
Hi,
I was jus
