On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, William G. Lea wrote:
>Pardon my intrusion, but is any of this documented anywhere in a concise
>way? I have had to upgrade to 4.3.0 on my RH8/Athelon to get a dual
>head radeon 9000 system to work, but 4.3.0 seems unstable. I'm getting
>random crashes. I've asked RH how to se
Pardon my intrusion, but is any of this documented anywhere in a concise
way? I have had to upgrade to 4.3.0 on my RH8/Athelon to get a dual
head radeon 9000 system to work, but 4.3.0 seems unstable. I'm getting
random crashes. I've asked RH how to set the system up but they have
refused to help s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Which does need to be uncommented to disable installing application
> > default files. Are the application default files the ones I want to stop
> > from being installed when I do a 'make install'?
>
> Maybe you should consider using a different ProjectRoot setting
Kendall Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ross Vandegrift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:24:09PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
> > > Is there an option to fix this in the host.def file? If so, perhaps this
> > > should be the default option when doing a make insta
Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Isn't the installer supposed to not replace xinit.rc if the file already
> > exists? That is what the comment in the xf86site.def file says, but that
> > would appear not to be the case?
>
> Well, /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc certainly wasn't updated during
Kendall Bennett wrote:
>
>
> Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Depends somewhat on how RH does X init. You can look through
> > startx and xinit setup and see what's being changed.
>
> Isn't the installer supposed to not replace xinit.rc if the file already
> exists? That is what
Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Might make more people willing to test
> > XFree86 releases on their machines. One experience like I had for the
> > average tester who just wants to help out is likely to cause him to re-
> > install his Linux distro and never run a 'make instal
Kendall Bennett wrote (in a message from Monday 31)
> Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Depends somewhat on how RH does X init. You can look through
> > startx and xinit setup and see what's being changed.
>
> Isn't the installer supposed to not replace xinit.rc if the file
Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Depends somewhat on how RH does X init. You can look through
> startx and xinit setup and see what's being changed.
Isn't the installer supposed to not replace xinit.rc if the file already
exists? That is what the comment in the xf86site.def file say
Kendall Bennett wrote:
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have been mass compiling and installing multiple versions of XFree86
> onto a machine for compatibility testing (Red Hat 7.3 based, so I can use
> the GDB hacked up debugger ;-). However whenever I do a 'make install'
> from a freshly built 4.2.0, 4.2.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 03:06:37PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
> Which does need to be uncommented to disable installing application
> default files. Are the application default files the ones I want to stop
> from being installed when I do a 'make install'?
For startx, you want to prevent blo
Ross Vandegrift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:24:09PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
> > Is there an option to fix this in the host.def file? If so, perhaps this
> > should be the default option when doing a make install??
>
> Yes it is an option, though I do not recall
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:24:09PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
> Is there an option to fix this in the host.def file? If so, perhaps this
> should be the default option when doing a make install??
Yes it is an option, though I do not recall which one. What I do
recall is that if you look in xf
Hi Guys,
I have been mass compiling and installing multiple versions of XFree86
onto a machine for compatibility testing (Red Hat 7.3 based, so I can use
the GDB hacked up debugger ;-). However whenever I do a 'make install'
from a freshly built 4.2.0, 4.2.1 or 4.3.0 (haven't done any ealier
v
14 matches
Mail list logo
