On 16.05.2012 20:31, qtnext wrote:
> I am using Qt since 12 years or more... I have done a lot of work using
> qwidget, qgraphiscview,
> I have done some small apps with qml to display media : it works very well
> ... just the animation are a a litlle bit
> jerky and work not well on very sm
On 05/15/2012 01:54 AM, ext Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:31:34PM -0700, ext Quim Gil wrote:
>> Dimitris Glezos from Transifex saw
>> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Localization . This is the page where we
>> explain how to localize the strings contained in Qt releases into
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 10:14:27 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 00.07.10, John Layt wrote:
> > The QAbstractPritnDialog and QAbstractPageSetupDialog classes are
> > completely unnecessary, are given as bad examples in the Qt API design
> > standards, and were marked
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 19:50:19 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> [cross-posting to kde-multimedia]
>
> On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 18.55.52, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why do we mantain an outdated fork of phonon in qt5.git
> > I am talking about the qtphonon repository.
> >
> >
I am using Qt since 12 years or more... I have done a lot of work using
qwidget, qgraphiscview,
I have done some small apps with qml to display media : it works very
well ... just the animation are a a litlle bit jerky and work not well
on very small computer ...
But now that Qt5 is here :
On 05/15/2012 07:53 PM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> I would like to preschedule a session to discuss the state of Qt5 on
> various embedded devices. I can drive this session.
OK, you got it. On Day 1, after lunch break.
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Program
T
[cross-posting to kde-multimedia]
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 18.55.52, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why do we mantain an outdated fork of phonon in qt5.git
> I am talking about the qtphonon repository.
>
> The Phonon team maintains phonon under the KDE umbrela, and the qtphonon
> repo
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 13.24.25, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> The FOSS developers HOPE that their interests are congruent
> with those of the mere customers and at least in QT's world,
> there's some evidence that this is true for some customers
> but there is also mounting evidence
Robin:
Thank you for explaining, succinctly, one of the critical
differences between commercial software and FOSS: Commercial
software contains those features that the customers will pay
for while FOSS only contains features that the developers are
interested in developing (for their own
[cross-posting to kde-multimedia]
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 18.55.52, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why do we mantain an outdated fork of phonon in qt5.git
> I am talking about the qtphonon repository.
>
> The Phonon team maintains phonon under the KDE umbrela, and the qtphonon
> repo
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 09.51.52, BRM wrote:
> I agree that QML is certainly in that camp; though the ignoring of QWidget
> is the issue.
No one is ignoring QWidget. We know it's there and what it's being used for.
No one here is under the illusion that QWidget isn't important.
It is.
Hi,
Why do we mantain an outdated fork of phonon in qt5.git
I am talking about the qtphonon repository.
The Phonon team maintains phonon under the KDE umbrela, and the qtphonon
repository is years behind.
Is there a point taking time to still update this repository to make it work
with Qt5?
> From: Thiago Macieira
>On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 16.56.05, Robin Burchell wrote:
>> That isn't how reality works. You cannot tell me (as a volunteer) what
>> I ought to be spending my time on any more than I can tell you what
>> color to paint your livingroom. My interests dictate wha
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 16.56.05, Robin Burchell wrote:
> That isn't how reality works. You cannot tell me (as a volunteer) what
> I ought to be spending my time on any more than I can tell you what
> color to paint your livingroom. My interests dictate what I invest my
> time into, not
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Atlant Schmidt
wrote:
> Qt "the product" may be developed by a meritocracy of devel-
> opers but it damned-well better respond in a more-or-less
> democratic way to the needs/demands of the consumers of the
> product. If it doesn't, those consumers will move on
When would alpha 2 happen?
2012/5/1 :
> Hi everybody,
>
> While I think it's very important to get Qt 5.0 out of the door as soon as
> possible, we should not release it without first getting it's quality to a
> very high standard.
>
> I think it has become rather clear that the original timeline
Hi Girish,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Hi Thiago and Thiago,
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Thiago Lacerda
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Thiago Macieira <
> thiago.macie...@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On terça-feira, 15 de
Samuel:
> It's worth noting that the Qt project is designed to
> be a meritocracy, not a democracy.
What this ignores, though, is the fact that the *CONSUMERS*
of the Qt product are not necessarily at all congruent with
the *DEVELOPERS* of the Qt product. (While there's some
cross-over, I
Could an approver please stage this change. Thanks.
Original Message
Subject: Change in qt/qtbase[master]: Fix bug when destruction fields
in QWizard
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:57:00 +0200
From: Lars Knoll (Code Review)
Reply-To:
To: Carl Schumann
CC: Qt San
Hi Thiago and Thiago,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Thiago Lacerda
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>>
>> On terça-feira, 15 de maio de 2012 19.53.14, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> > Can we also have a sessions for Qt Widgets and Qt components? I can
Any opinions on this?
I fear the mail drowned in other mails on the list.
--
.marius
On May 1, 2012, at 3:33 PM,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in the days, when we were approaching a new release of Qt, we would use
> a black team which would be responsible for driving the testing of a new
> packa
Il 16/05/2012 10:17, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 02.49.31, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
I am trying to copy libQtCore.so.5.0.0 to another different folder to debug
with my application, but find that I can't step into the source code.
After look into libQtCore,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
>
> I would like to preschedule a session to discuss the state of Qt5 on
> various embedded devices. I can drive this session.
>
I could help with write down meeting/session minutes - if you need
someone to do so. The subject of cross to
Hi,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On terça-feira, 15 de maio de 2012 19.53.14, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> > Can we also have a sessions for Qt Widgets and Qt components? I can
> > drive the former but not the latter.
>
> Don't worry, for the latter we've got the INdT
> It's worth noting that the Qt project is designed to be a meritocracy,
> not a democracy.
Most important: a do-cracy. Changes don't happen if everybody talks
and nobody writes the code.
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt
On 16 May 2012 01:31, André Pönitz
wrote:
> I trust the audience would be delighted if you gave some insight
> into the calculation.
For the argument's sake, let's say that the poll shows statistical
relevance. That is, there's a huge interest in having a complete set
of C++ bindings for QML (or
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 09.32.59, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Thiago Macieira said:
> > > I am guessing you all have transitioned to 64 bits for your build
> > > system, etc. What is your policy statement on 32 bit systems? Try
> > > not break them? They deserve to get broken? ??? Fo
On 05/16/2012 11:14 AM, ext André Somers wrote:
> Op 16-5-2012 1:31, André Pönitz schreef:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:13:19AM -0700, BRM wrote:
From: Donald Carr
[...] This is out of a sample set of 110 people, which is
infinitesimally small in comparison to the Qt user base. It
Op 16-5-2012 1:31, André Pönitz schreef:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:13:19AM -0700, BRM wrote:
>>> From: Donald Carr
>>> [...] This is out of a sample set of 110 people, which is
>>> infinitesimally small in comparison to the Qt user base. It would
>>> be a stretch to call this a statistically si
On 16/05/2012 10:18, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 07.13.09, k blammo wrote:
>> Seems to me the real bug here is: Why doesn't Qt pick up the bundled
>> zlib when it is told to.
>
> I have a couple of pending changes fixing that. There seems to be a few bugs
> here and
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 07.13.09, k blammo wrote:
> Seems to me the real bug here is: Why doesn't Qt pick up the bundled
> zlib when it is told to. I will try to reproduce but since I'm building
> this on my grand-dads old pocket watch that will take a while.
I have a couple of pending
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 02.49.31, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
> I am trying to copy libQtCore.so.5.0.0 to another different folder to debug
> with my application, but find that I can't step into the source code.
>
> After look into libQtCore, it seems that the path of source code is rel
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 00.07.10, John Layt wrote:
> The QAbstractPritnDialog and QAbstractPageSetupDialog classes are
> completely unnecessary, are given as bad examples in the Qt API design
> standards, and were marked to be merged with QPrintDialog and
> QPageSetupDialog in Qt5.
Hi
On terça-feira, 15 de maio de 2012 19.53.14, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Can we also have a sessions for Qt Widgets and Qt components? I can
> drive the former but not the latter.
Don't worry, for the latter we've got the INdT guys coming who have stuff to
present on that area. And we can press J
34 matches
Mail list logo
