On Nov 11, 2012, at 6:07 AM, Sze Howe Koh szehowe@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. I've opened tickets for this:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27940
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27941
I asked because I'm working on patches for Qt
Hi,
I have been following discussion on this thread for a while now and here
are some comments from CI point of view. First I would like to list
existing CI configurations since there clearly are some misunderstandings:
Qt 4.8
linux-g++-32_Ubuntu_10.04_x86
Hi All,
As I've request presence for the project in FOSDEM, I'd like to know if
people would be interested in giving talks and showcasing demos
specifically for latest Qt5 features and at the most 1 4.8 cool demo at the
FOSDEM stand, if we're granted one.
Let's keep the discussion on
Hi all,
Qt 4.8.4 Release candidate 3 packages are available at
http://releases.qt-project.org/digia/4.8.4_RC3/
It is built on SHA1: d742aa4ee727de0e318e26ba24b11a780081f0c9
Br,
Juhani
--
Juhani Taipale
Software Specialist - Digia, Qt
Visit us on: http://qt.digia.com
Juhani Taipale
Software
On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
Tukka and Qi Liang wants to see OS X 10.8 (maybe replacing 10.6) in the list.
The feasibility of this is probably something again for the CI system
maintainers + mac platform maintainer (Morten) to answer...
We should make
There haven't been too much discussion about different Linux
configurations, But as you can see from list of currently CI tested
configurations there are quite many of them. Personally I'm thinking
that we should remove Ubuntu
10.04 or at least reduce the number of tested configurations from
On 11/14/12 8:37 AM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
10.6 is separate issue. It is getting less relevant, but still has a
significant market share (31%)[0]. I would say it's a bit to early to drop it.
Also 10.6 supports 32-bit machines. If 10.6 is still officially
supported, so should 32-bit on 10.6.
Could openSuse Build Service results be used at all?
On 15/11/2012 12:38 AM, Stephen Chu wrote:
On 11/14/12 8:37 AM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
10.6 is separate issue. It is getting less relevant, but still has a
significant market share (31%)[0]. I would say it's a bit to early to drop
it.
Also
On 11/14/2012 12:17 PM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
QtConcurrent is done. The implementation is not good enough to be used as a
base for further development.
Can you be a bit more specific? What are the general problems and why
can't they be easily solved?
Christian
On 2012-11-14, Christian Kandeler christian.kande...@digia.com wrote:
On 11/14/2012 12:17 PM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
QtConcurrent is done. The implementation is not good enough to be used as a
base for further development.
Can you be a bit more specific? What are the general problems and why
10 matches
Mail list logo
