On quinta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2013 22.22.40, Thiago A. Corrêa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules
>
> wrote:
> > QtGui to make proper use of that abstraction, but then you have the
> > problem
> > of backporting it to Qt 4. Or you could duplicate the header
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules
wrote:
> QtGui to make proper use of that abstraction, but then you have the problem
> of backporting it to Qt 4. Or you could duplicate the header across all 3
Sorry I'm jumping in the conversation without much knowleadge of those
APIs,
As if it's possible for COM to be beautiful? :)
I looked over your code briefly and it looks pretty nice.
Implementing something like QtDockTile is somewhat odd because the it was
developed as a series of plugins with a single QDockTile API. I think the
abstraction of these platform features in
Something more beautiful. :)
Firstly, there's no need in C-style abstractions.
Secondly, there will be implemented some more features.
And it won't be designed as a pugin for plugin, which uses library wrapped by
another library.
I've already done some features. Code is here:
https://github.c
Ah, I'm familiar with the project from which it was forked. If this is not the
code that is going to be a proposal for QWindowsExtras then what is?
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On Jan 24, 2013, at 5:14 P
Of course it is.
Here is the project: https://github.com/dtf/QtDockTile
Here is the somewhat ugly code, which was born by cloudy consciousness:
https://github.com/dtf/QtDockTile/tree/master/src/plugins/windows
Note that it is not the code that is going to be a proposal for Qt Windows
Extras.
2
Interesting. Is your wrapper open source and where might one find it?
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On Jan 24, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Ivan V. wrote:
> Hello, Jake,
>
> The main "unusualness" about our wrappe
Hello, Jake,
The main "unusualness" about our wrapper is that it not only wraps
ICustomDestinationList COM-interface, but also allows programmer to put there
QActions and use it like with some kind of menus. What it does it stores these
actions, gives them unique id's, and those id-s puts into
On quinta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2013 12.17.20, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Parts of the packaging process is in gerrit (namely qtsdk/qtsdk.git),
> >
> > so he should be really be able to stage things
> >
> >
>
> uh, wtf?! nothing against iikka specifically (couldn't judge it), but
> this is
Hi,
There haven't fortunately been any objections yet to this proposal, also
unfortunately also no approval yet from a Qt maintainer.
Anyone willing to approve the inclusion? :)
Simon
Simon Hausmann wrote:
Hi all,
Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize show
Hi Aleksey,
I'm not sure I follow - "we have an unusual jump lists wrapper" - who exactly
are you referring to? If you could elaborate a little more that would be great.
Thanks,
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-
We have an unusual Jump Lists wrapper, which transforms so called Task Lists
into a interactive menu, which is somewhat widely used now. The question is —
should we implement this in Qt Windows Extrasr or default behavour wrapper is
preferred?
___
Deve
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Carlo A. Scarpato <
carlo.scarp...@selcomsrl.eu> wrote:
> I tried with python 2.7.3 (another suggested stable release) and
> compiled without problems ( a part 4 hours of compilation;))
>
You can change the build to python 2 in the relevant webkit file where the
i
Il giorno mar, 22/01/2013 alle 11.52 -0800, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
> On terça-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2013 19.47.10, Carlo A. Scarpato wrote:
> > (set "PATH=C:\Development\qt-everywhere-opensource-src-5.0.1_mingw64
> > qtbase\..\gnuwin32\bin;%PATH%") && python
> > C:/Development/qt-everywhere-
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:53:17PM +0100, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Thursday 24. January 2013 14.49.33 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > I think it's reasonable to expect that people exercise their approver
> > > rights with care, and only use it were appropriate.
> > >
> >
> > one would think so.
On Thursday 24. January 2013 14.49.33 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > I think it's reasonable to expect that people exercise their approver
> > rights with care, and only use it were appropriate.
> >
>
> one would think so. but we did already see things go wrong because
> approvers made assumptions
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> moin,
>
> it occurred to me that the inability of contributors to stage/submit
> their own changes ( https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-303 )
> results merely from our stupidity, and not some technical problem. so
> after
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Anyhow, you might then start to wonder whether anyone who's an
> approver for qt-creator necessarily needs approver rights for
> qtwebkit, qt-creator etc ...
>
yes, i've been wondering, too. the model as it was originally designed
simply
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:32:09PM +, Koehne Kai wrote:
>>> Parts of the packaging process is in gerrit (namely qtsdk/qtsdk.git),
>>
>>> so he should be really be able to stage things :)
>>>
>> uh, wtf?! nothing against iikka specifically (couldn't judge it), but this
>> is so
>> totally *
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:17 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development]
On Thu, January 24, 2013 12:02:56 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> moin,
>
> it occurred to me that the inability of contributors to stage/submit
> their own changes ( https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-303 )
> results merely from our stupidity, and not some technical problem. so after
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:32:09PM +, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Parts of the packaging process is in gerrit (namely qtsdk/qtsdk.git),
> so he should be really be able to stage things :)
>
uh, wtf?! nothing against iikka specifically (couldn't judge it), but
this is so totally *not* a reason to mak
moin,
it occurred to me that the inability of contributors to stage/submit
their own changes ( https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-303 )
results merely from our stupidity, and not some technical problem. so
after consultation with sergio i just changed it. at least i think so. ^^
t
23 matches
Mail list logo
