Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Knoll Lars wrote: > From an API perspective it looks pretty good. I'm not an expert on serial > ports, but from what I recall from the time I dealt a little with them > (must be 10 years ago or so…) it looks pretty complete as well. S o with > the changes proposed

Re: [Development] [semi-solved] Qt5 moc error in combination with boost

Am 25.01.2013 21:34, schrieb Knoll Lars: On Jan 22, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Jan Krause > wrote: Am 22.01.2013 14:58, schrieb Olivier Goffart: On Tuesday 22 January 2013 06:32:45 Charley Bay wrote: There's a Qt5 moc error when using Boost, with a work-around. See

Re: [Development] Importing Snowshoe QML browser to the Qt project

Great :) apps/snowshoe sounds like a good location to me, too. Caio, what do you think? Simon Knoll Lars wrote: Approved. I'm really happy this gets contributed to the project. Only question is where to place it inside the project hierarchy. Would apps/showshoe be ok for everybody? Cheers

Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver

On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2013 14.10.56, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> of course it is. but it is not the only skill. a contribution may be >> technically as correct as it gets, but if the contributor lives in his >> tiny world without

Re: [Development] Importing Snowshoe QML browser to the Qt project

Approved. I'm really happy this gets contributed to the project. Only question is where to place it inside the project hierarchy. Would apps/showshoe be ok for everybody? Cheers, Lars On Jan 24, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Hausmann Simon mailto:simon.hausm...@digia.com>> wrote: Hi, There haven't for

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

+1, that is good news. Am 26.01.2013 um 01:06 schrieb "Knoll Lars " : > Hi Lazlo, > > sorry for the late answer. > > I went through the module now, and it looks like a good and solid piece of work. Thanks to everybody who contributed :) > > From an API perspective it looks pretty good. I'm not

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

Hi Lazlo, sorry for the late answer. I went through the module now, and it looks like a good and solid piece of work. Thanks to everybody who contributed :) >From an API perspective it looks pretty good. I'm not an expert on serial >ports, but from what I recall from the time I dealt a little

Re: [Development] [semi-solved] Qt5 moc error in combination with boost

On Jan 22, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Jan Krause mailto:jan.krause.n...@gmail.com>> wrote: Am 22.01.2013 14:58, schrieb Olivier Goffart: On Tuesday 22 January 2013 06:32:45 Charley Bay wrote: There's a Qt5 moc error when using Boost, with a work-around. See: http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/22

Re: [Development] QtMultimedia BIC / header cleanliness issue

On 2013-01-22, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Sune, especially for you: will you try and patch Qt to change the sonam= > e if we=20 > don't do it? Sorry for answering a bit late. Given that we haven't yet formally published Qt5, no. if we had, then it would be a definately maybe depending on a insan

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 RC -- Release Testing

libgcc-s-sjlj-1.dll missing to start uic.exe or linguist or creator.exe from path C:\Qt\Qt5.0.1\5.0.1\mingw47_32\bin\linguist.exe 2013/1/25 Motyka Rafal > Hello, > > Qt 5.0.1 RC release testing has been started. We would like to kindly ask > the Qt Community for help by testing the new packages

Re: [Development] Status update on Digia's Qt for Android project

On sexta-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2013 15.47.35, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: > 1. What should we do about OpenSSL and our binary distributions? There > are legal issues related to deploying applications that contain > cryptographic software in some countries, so we need to find out how to

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 RC -- Release Testing

On sexta-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2013 16.45.31, Frank Hemer wrote: > On Friday 25 January 2013 23:15:57 Sze Howe Koh wrote: > > On 25 January 2013 23:04, Frank Hemer wrote: > > > > 2. Qt bug reports should be reported in JIRA: > > > > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/ > > > > > > What about t

Re: [Development] Any way to mention build folder prefix/suffix?

On sexta-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2013 15.07.40, Arunprasad Rajkumar wrote: > Is it possible to add such string while configuring? No. But it's possible to do the following: mkdir ../qt-emb-gcc-4.4-mipsel cd ../qt-emb-gcc-4.4-mipsel $OLDPWD/configure -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) int

Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver

On sexta-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2013 14.10.56, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > of course it is. but it is not the only skill. a contribution may be > technically as correct as it gets, but if the contributor lives in his > tiny world without ever having looked outside, there is a good chance he > will

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 -- Release Testing

On sexta-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2013 02.44.46, Chris Gilbert wrote: > Is there any chance we can get Desktop OpenGL builds to test under > msvc2010/i386 soon? > > For a lot of us using QT for professional tools development, the lack of one > has been a showstopper. > > (We've been attempting our

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 RC -- Release Testing

On Friday 25 January 2013 23:15:57 Sze Howe Koh wrote: > On 25 January 2013 23:04, Frank Hemer wrote: > > > 2. Qt bug reports should be reported in JIRA: > > > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/ > > > > What about those >200 reports against 5.0.0 that still have not been > > evaluated? Some of

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 RC -- Release Testing

On 25 January 2013 23:04, Frank Hemer wrote: > > 2. Qt bug reports should be reported in JIRA: > > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/ > > What about those >200 reports against 5.0.0 that still have not been > evaluated? Some of them are there for quite some time. > Does this mean, fixes will no

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 RC -- Release Testing

On Friday 25 January 2013 14:44:26 Motyka Rafal wrote: > Hello, > > Qt 5.0.1 RC release testing has been started. We would like to kindly ask > the Qt Community for help by testing the new packages. > > 1. Installer packages are available here: > http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5/5.0.1-rc1/ >

[Development] Status update on Digia's Qt for Android project

Hi, As I promised earlier, I will give a short update on the Qt for Android project at Digia on a semi-regular basis. First off, let me introduce the people in Digia who are working on the project: Sinan Tanilkan, acting as product manager Eskil Blomfeldt (me), acting as project lead Develope

[Development] Qt 5.0.1 RC -- Release Testing

Hello, Qt 5.0.1 RC release testing has been started. We would like to kindly ask the Qt Community for help by testing the new packages. 1. Installer packages are available here: http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5/5.0.1-rc1/ 2. Qt bug repor

Re: [Development] input method support in Qt5 (linux)

Hi, (Since I'm not used to one this list, so this reply might not on the thread) I'm a linux input method developer (fcitx) myself. The only problem is, libX11 provides xim implementation, while xcb doesn't, so actually xim for qt5 is a little bit hard to implement. But still there is some reas

Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:15:33PM +0100, Simon Hausmann wrote: > Ossi, does it make more sense if the skill we are talking about here > is the ability to tell whether a change in their area of expertise is > correct or not, with a probability of correctness high enough to bring > the project forwa

Re: [Development] Importing Snowshoe QML browser to the Qt project

On Thursday 24 January 2013 21:18:30 Hausmann Simon wrote: > There haven't fortunately been any objections yet to this proposal, also > unfortunately also no approval yet from a Qt maintainer. Anyone willing to > approve the inclusion? How about I propose it and you approve? :) - Paul ___

Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver

On Friday, January 25, 2013 11:33:28 AM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:24:16PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quinta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2013 12.17.20, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > > Parts of the packaging process is in gerrit (namely qtsdk/qtsdk.git), > > > >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 -- Release Testing

Is there any chance we can get Desktop OpenGL builds to test under msvc2010/i386 soon? For a lot of us using QT for professional tools development, the lack of one has been a showstopper. (We've been attempting our own desktop gl builds from qt 5 git, but have run into other issues) Thanks

Re: [Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:24:16PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2013 12.17.20, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > Parts of the packaging process is in gerrit (namely qtsdk/qtsdk.git), > > > > > > so he should be really be able to stage things > > > > > > > > >

[Development] Any way to mention build folder prefix/suffix?

Hello Developers, Is there any way to add build directory prefix to Qt build system. May be while doing ./configure? Suppose If i build for mipsel target the build directory willbe qt/src/corelib/.obj/*release-shared-emb-mipsel* * * I aware we can retain the object files if we are building for n

Re: [Development] Qt Windows Extras and Jump Lists

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Jake Petroules < jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote: > If we took the tempting approach of providing a logical QDockTile class > wrapper that was to be incorporated into QtGui 5.1, and provided a > separate addon for Qt 4... where would such an addon go? A new qt4

Re: [Development] Qt Windows Extras and Jump Lists

If we took the tempting approach of providing a logical QDockTile class wrapper that was to be incorporated into QtGui 5.1, and provided a separate addon for Qt 4... where would such an addon go? A new qt4docktile library? On Friday, January 25, 2013, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at

Re: [Development] Qt Windows Extras and Jump Lists

  25.01.2013, 03:09, "Jake Thomas Petroules" :Implementing something like QtDockTile is somewhat odd because the it was developed as a series of plugins with a single QDockTile API. I think the abstraction of these platform features into a single logical API is useful, however I'm not sure we can d

Re: [Development] Proposing Bogdan Vatra as approver

>  > On 01/03/2013 01:29 PM, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to propose BogDan Vatra for approver status. >> >> BogDan is the main author of the Android-port of Qt 4.8, called >> "Necessitas". He is now porting his work to Qt 5 and he has > graciously >> agreed to c

Re: [Development] Qt Windows Extras and Jump Lists

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > However, if the developers want to do it, they can release a version of the > addon that compiles and works with Qt 4, like the serial port people are > trying to do. > I agree. Even closer example that QtSerialPort: I have been also

Re: [Development] Proposing Bogdan Vatra as approver

On 01/03/2013 01:29 PM, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose BogDan Vatra for approver status. > > BogDan is the main author of the Android-port of Qt 4.8, called > "Necessitas". He is now porting his work to Qt 5 and he has graciously > agreed to contribute the code to t

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0.1 -- Release Testing

After installed qt-windows-opensource-5.0.1-msvc2010_64-x86_64-offline-2013-01-24-418.exe, I can't running xmlpatterns.exe,assistant.exe,etc on Windows 7 64bit OS. 2013/1/18 Motyka Rafal > Hello, > > Qt 5.0.1 release testing has been started. We would like to kindly ask > the Qt Community for

Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a "non-destabilising" bug-fix?

On Friday 25. January 2013 09.12.09 Knoll Lars wrote: > On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > On Friday 11 January 2013 07:40:39 Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> On sexta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2013 15.21.43, Olivier Goffart wrote: > >>> Go to stable: > >>> a. Fixes to regressions

Re: [Development] input method support in Qt5 (linux)

Hi Gatis, On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Paeglis Gatis mailto:gatis.paeg...@digia.com>> wrote: After looking at Qt4 / Qt5 source code and doing some internet search I see that ibus plugin has become a part of Qt, where in Qt4 it was a separate plugin hosted somewhere else.. Qt4 offered two opt

Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a "non-destabilising" bug-fix?

On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Friday 11 January 2013 07:40:39 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On sexta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2013 15.21.43, Olivier Goffart wrote: >>> Go to stable: >>> a. Fixes to regressions against a previous "recent" version of Qt. (less >>> than