On Mar 18, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 3/18/13 3:22 PM, "Oswald Buddenhagen"
> wrote:
>>>
>> i'd like to raise a formal objection.
>>
>> CI was virtually unusable for two weeks now.
>> due to that there is a completely unreasonable backlog of changes meant
>> for 5.1 now. it make
On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 3/18/13 4:58 PM, "Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Thomas McGuire
>> wrote:
>>
>> QtSensors needs to be added to qt5.git, but couldn't yet, due to CI
>> failures.
>> See https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,489
On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 2013 19.57.41, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Mediator Software
wrote:
> > In "the real world", Qt on iOS is being used primarily to port existing
> > QtWidget applications to the iPad, not to write new ones (nor to do
> > anything on a
On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Mediator Software
wrote:
> In "the real world", Qt on iOS is being used primarily to port existing
> QtWidget
> applications to the iPad, not to write new ones (nor to do anything on any
> other
> iOS platforms). There is a single customer using QML on iOS, once
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 2013 14.39.14, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> I'm not fond of this distinction because it's not very practical. I
>> have plenty of low priority bugs assigned to me which I'm intending to
>> fix "sometime". Does this
On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 2013 14.39.14, Alan Alpert wrote:
> I'm not fond of this distinction because it's not very practical. I
> have plenty of low priority bugs assigned to me which I'm intending to
> fix "sometime". Does this count as "someone is going to work on the
> item"? Because it
On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 2013 19.31.03, Knoll Lars wrote:
> >I know of only the QUrlPathInfo and the timezone features, plus minor API
> >changes, for QtCore. The former is something that had been lost in my
> >large
> >dashboard until last week, and John's changes were too big to review
>
Don't you mean Mac and Windows? I thought X11 was added a while ago.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On Mar 18, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 3/18/13 4:58 PM, "Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>
>> On Mon,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Jason McDonald wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Motyka Rafal wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I want to express another suggestions for bug management:
>> - A newly opened bug report shouldn't be automatically assigned to anyone.
>> - Logged-in users should be abl
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 3/18/13 6:36 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>
>>On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 2013 15.18.07, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>> We have said that we'll move to time based releases. Should we stop this
>>> because we aren't yet good enough in controllin
On 3/18/13 6:36 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 2013 15.18.07, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> We have said that we'll move to time based releases. Should we stop this
>> because we aren't yet good enough in controlling our systems? I don't
>> think so. It might feel unfair to
On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 2013 15.18.07, Knoll Lars wrote:
> We have said that we'll move to time based releases. Should we stop this
> because we aren't yet good enough in controlling our systems? I don't
> think so. It might feel unfair to some people, but we've had these
> discussions abo
Don't you mean Mac and Windows? I thought X11 was added a while ago.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 18, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 3/18/13 4:58 PM, "Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Thomas McGuire
>> wrote:
>>
>> QtSensors needs to be added to qt5.git, bu
On 3/18/13 4:58 PM, "Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Thomas McGuire
>wrote:
>
>QtSensors needs to be added to qt5.git, but couldn't yet, due to CI
>failures.
>See https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,48905.
>
>
>
>+ QtSerialPort: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#chan
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Thomas McGuire wrote:
> QtSensors needs to be added to qt5.git, but couldn't yet, due to CI
> failures.
> See https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,48905.
>
+ QtSerialPort: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,49157
Laszlo
___
Hi,
On Monday 18 March 2013 16:18:07 Knoll Lars wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:24:23AM +, Ahumada Sergio wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
> >>
> >>
> >> - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >i'd
On 3/18/13 3:22 PM, "Oswald Buddenhagen"
wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:24:23AM +, Ahumada Sergio wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
>>
>> - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
>>
>i'd like to raise a formal objection.
>
>CI was vi
On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 2013 15.16.34, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013 11:35:27 Knoll Lars wrote:
> > We're about to start the 5.1 process
>
> About to... but not yet started. So no restrictions applies yet.
Correct. Since you are done, you could integrate.
But here's th
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:24:23AM +, Ahumada Sergio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
>
> - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
>
i'd like to raise a formal objection.
CI was virtually unusable for two weeks now.
due to that there is a c
On Monday 18 March 2013 11:35:27 Knoll Lars wrote:
> We're about to start the 5.1 process
About to... but not yet started. So no restrictions applies yet.
> (ie. branch into stable) etc, and the
> feature is not blocking anything critical for the release. So I'd say give
> it some time and let'
On Monday, March 18, 2013 13:22:32 Ahumada Sergio wrote:
> >> - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
> >>
> >> - After March 19th any changes that are required to get in for 5.1
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-February/009838.html
Is there any concer
On 18 March 2013 14:22, Ahumada Sergio wrote:
> About the tag, one could argue that making the tag (and alpha release) before
> or after the merge might be the same.
This is not only about making the 5.1.0-alpha1 tag. This is about not
breaking forward binary compatibility in stable unless extra
On 18 March 2013 11:24, Ahumada Sergio wrote:
>>
>> Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
>>
>> - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
>>
>> - After March 19th any changes that are required to get in for 5.1
>> need to be pushed into 'stable' branch. So if your ne
Hi Sze-Howe,
Thanks for the information.
Regards,
Amogh.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> On 18 March 2013 18:58, Amogh Kudari wrote:
> > Hi Thiago,
> >
> >Thanks for your response. I am unaware of the group that is dedicated
> to
> > discussing development
> > wit
On 18 March 2013 18:58, Amogh Kudari wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
>
>Thanks for your response. I am unaware of the group that is dedicated to
> discussing development
> with Qt. Can you provide some info about it (email id and registration).
>
> Regards,
> Amogh.
Hi Amogh,
The mailing list for discus
On 18 March 2013 11:24, Ahumada Sergio wrote:
>
> Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
>
> - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
>
> - After March 19th any changes that are required to get in for 5.1
> need to be pushed into 'stable' branch. So if your needed cha
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:37:19AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 11 de março de 2013 07.41.02, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote:
> > Jens claimed on the blog that the native look and feel matters less in the
> > mobile world because each app is fullscreen. I agree that it matters
On Monday 18 March 2013 11:29:54 Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 3/18/13 12:04 PM, "Sean Harmer" wrote:
> >On Monday 18 March 2013 11:00:57 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> >> On 18.3.2013 12.42, "Sean Harmer" wrote:
> >> >On Monday 18 March 2013 10:27:45 Shaw Andy wrote:
> >> >> > Making of Qt 5.1 minor release w
On 3/14/13 1:00 PM, "Jason McDonald" wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Anttila Janne
>wrote:
>> Jason McDonald wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Thiago Macieira
>>> wrote:
On terça-feira, 12 de março de 2013 13.28.37, Motyka Rafal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to
On 3/17/13 5:21 PM, "Olivier Goffart" wrote:
>On Sunday 17 March 2013 08:13:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On domingo, 17 de março de 2013 11.13.01, Olivier Goffart wrote:
>> > On Sunday 10 March 2013 10:09:24 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > > On domingo, 10 de março de 2013 23.54.42, Sze Howe Koh wrot
On 3/18/13 12:04 PM, "Sean Harmer" wrote:
>On Monday 18 March 2013 11:00:57 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
>> On 18.3.2013 12.42, "Sean Harmer" wrote:
>> >On Monday 18 March 2013 10:27:45 Shaw Andy wrote:
>> >> > Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
>> >> >
>> >> > - Plan is to move 'dev' int
On Monday 18 March 2013 11:00:57 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> On 18.3.2013 12.42, "Sean Harmer" wrote:
> >On Monday 18 March 2013 10:27:45 Shaw Andy wrote:
> >> > Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
> >> >
> >> > - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
> >> >
> >> > -
On 18.3.2013 12.42, "Sean Harmer" wrote:
>On Monday 18 March 2013 10:27:45 Shaw Andy wrote:
>> > Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
>> >
>> > - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
>> >
>> > - After March 19th any changes that are required to get in for 5.1
>>
Hi Thiago,
Thanks for your response. I am unaware of the group that is dedicated
to discussing development
with Qt. Can you provide some info about it (email id and registration).
Regards,
Amogh.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 18 de março de 201
On Monday 18 March 2013 10:27:45 Shaw Andy wrote:
> > Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
> >
> > - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
> >
> > - After March 19th any changes that are required to get in for 5.1
> >
> > need to be pushed into 'stable' branch. S
> Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
>
> - Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
>
> - After March 19th any changes that are required to get in for 5.1
> need to be pushed into 'stable' branch. So if your needed changes don't
> make it today,
> please wait aft
Hi,
Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
- Plan is to move 'dev' into 'stable' branch on March 19th.
- After March 19th any changes that are required to get in for 5.1
need to be pushed into 'stable' branch. So if your needed changes don't make
it today,
please wait after the me
On 15 Mar 2013, at 2:03 PM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>
> Not much relevant here, but just in the unlikely event that everyone
> will confess to like this style more, here's what I use in my own projects:
>
>
> MyClass::MyClass(...):
>GvbWidget(parent),
>m_background()
> {
I do that
38 matches
Mail list logo
