On Jan 23, 2014, at 7:16 PM, Adam Light wrote:
> All but one developer at my (smallish) company is still using OSX 10.6.8
> because we need 10.6 to be able to build the current shipping version of our
> main product. We all use Qt Creator, so a Creator 3.2 that would not work on
> 10.6 would
I'm guessing it has something with the unified title and toolbar on mac fix?
On 01/23/2014 10:17 PM, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
> I have just noticed that OSX 5.2.1 offline snapshot (clang) DMG is 60MB
> slimmer (396 MB) than it was in 5.2.0 (455 MB). Do you know what is the
> reason of such differe
On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 06:20:23, Jan Farø wrote:
> Worldwide: http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-monthly-201212-201312-bar (Win7:
> 52%, XP: 22%, Mac OS: 7%)
>
> Denmark: http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-DK-monthly-201212-201312-bar (Win7:
> 53%, Mac OS: 16%, iOS: 8.5%) Denmark is a coun
On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 03:16:54, Jan Farø wrote:
> XP was introduced in 2001. It’s still supported.
We had a thread on that too.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
On Thursday 23 January 2014 18:14:12 Salovaara Akseli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have now first snapshots available for Qt 4.8.6 on
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/4.8/2014-01-23_453/. Could you
> please check those and verify your fixes?
>
> Packages are built against sha1 cf179ef3e38
On 24/01/2014, at 03.46, Alexis Menard wrote:
>
> XP was introduced in 2001. It’s still supported. Mac OS 10.6 was introduced
> in 2009. I understand the desire to get rid of the messiness under the hood,
> but I think it should be considered that it cuts out users on hardware
> platforms not
On 24/01/2014, at 03.46, Alexis Menard wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Jan Farø wrote:
>
> I don’t think anybody has mentioned the lack of ability to upgrade hardware -
> mostly because of financial issues, I suppose. 10.6 is as far as I know the
> last Mac OS to support 3
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Jan Farø wrote:
>
> On 23/01/2014, at 23.59, development-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
>
>
> If you do the math from the data available here
> http://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10&qpcustomd=0
> (that’s December 2013), 10.6 acco
On 23/01/2014, at 23.59, development-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
>
>> If you do the math from the data available here
>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10&qpcustomd=0
>> (that’s December 2013), 10.6 accounts for slightly less than 20% of all the
>> OS
Frederik,
> The CI team cannot really set up the CI without a single test to try
running ...
I added some basic tests, please look here:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,76396
It is enough?
Best regards,
Denis
23.01.2014 21:31, Frederik Gladhorn пишет:
> Torsdag 23. januar 2014 15.
Good news. Looking forward to it...
Thanks,
Pawel
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Sean Harmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 22 January 2014 21:42:40 Jesper Weissglas wrote:
>> Qt3D looks appetizing for my next project, but I'm not having much luck
>> with finding out what's going on.
>>
>> So I
All but one developer at my (smallish) company is still using OSX 10.6.8
because we need 10.6 to be able to build the current shipping version of
our main product. We all use Qt Creator, so a Creator 3.2 that would not
work on 10.6 would be a problem for us.
Adam
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:29 AM,
/MSVC2012.
Changes file draft
(http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/4.8/2014-01-23_453/changes-4.8.6-20140123-453)
is matching to the package content (changes file inside packages will updated
during RC\final).
Qt 4.8.6 MinGW package is built against MinGW4.4 but there is a plan to
Torsdag 23. januar 2014 15.52.12 skrev Denis Shienkov:
> > I think we can start with this, we'll get back when necessary. If you
>
> have some test to verify that it works, it would be great.
>
> No, unfortunately we have no any tests, because we planned them only after
> CI will be ready.
There
On 2014-01-23, at 11:45 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2014 15:15:16, Robert Knight wrote:
>> As for the reason why usage of OS X 10.6 is still high - I think that
>> is down to awareness of the need to upgrade and the effort/time vs.
>> perceived benefits, as well
On quinta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2014 15:15:16, Robert Knight wrote:
> As for the reason why usage of OS X 10.6 is still high - I think that
> is down to awareness of the need to upgrade and the effort/time vs.
> perceived benefits, as well as hardware compatibility issues. Once
> browsers (FF, Ch
> If you do the math from the data available here
> http://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10&qpcustomd=0
> (that’s December 2013), 10.6 accounts for slightly less than 20% of all the
> OS X versions. Let’s suppose those numbers reflect the reality.
For our app at
Hi,
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 21:42:40 Jesper Weissglas wrote:
> Qt3D looks appetizing for my next project, but I'm not having much luck
> with finding out what's going on.
>
> So I thought I'd ask.
Best way to get answers ;)
> Following instruction on http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt3D-Install
Correct. This is a bit unfortunate since platforms like eglfs and linuxfb most
certainly deserve a page in the documentation.
I have created http://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-36412 for this.
Cheers,
Laszlo
From: development-bounces+laszlo.ago
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/supported-platforms.html
"Embedded Linux (DirectFB, EGLFS, KMS, and Wayland)"
Am I right that this sentence is the complete documentation
for using Qt 5 on an embedded system?
Nothing about how to build, what's needed for QML,
what for QWidgets, how to replace qws,
Hi,
Let's make this:
> Qt Creator 3.2:
> - drop support for compiling & running Qt Creator on 10.6
> We want to start using C++11 also in Qt Creator, and 10.6 is the only thing
> preventing that. Since 10.6 is deployment target only for Qt, we don’t
> necessarily need to keep “its IDE” running
I have just noticed that OSX 5.2.1 offline snapshot (clang) DMG is 60MB slimmer
(396 MB) than it was in 5.2.0 (455 MB). Do you know what is the reason of such
difference?
Regards,
--
Adam
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://
On Jan 23, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> On 22/01/14 9:02 , Ziller Eike wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø
>> wrote:
>>> 5.3:
>>>
>>> - Remove support from binary packages - No CI = In practice,
>>> deprecated, so let's be explicit about it for 5.3
>>>
>>>
> I think we can start with this, we'll get back when necessary. If you
have some test to verify that it works, it would be great.
No, unfortunately we have no any tests, because we planned them only after
CI will be ready.
Best regards,
Denis
2014/1/23 Fält Simo
>
> On 23.1.2014, at 9.58, D
On 22/01/14 9:02 , Ziller Eike wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø
> wrote:
>> 5.3:
>>
>> - Remove support from binary packages - No CI = In practice,
>> deprecated, so let's be explicit about it for 5.3
>>
>> 5.4
>>
>> - Bump the dev branch to 5.4 - Remove 10.6 code as see f
On 23.1.2014, at 9.58, Denis Shienkov
mailto:denis.shien...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hi Simo, Guys.
Many thanks for your involvement.
> You can use this https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-682
I added there some instruction for "com0com" installation. So, what additional
info stil
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Chris L wrote:
> Qt Creator could be, with a few fixed bugs the obvious #1 choice ( if it
> isn't already ) for general cross platform c++
Which bugs are those in your oppinion?
> but it seems like the devs ignore non Qt c++ development.
What makes you say that?
Clang code model highlight feature works fine, but code completion is too
slow to daily use.
Some debug messages:
... Completion done in 7387 ms, with 12 items.
... Completion done in 3287 ms, with 14105 items.
... Completion done in 3236 ms, with 189 items.
... Completion done in 3325 ms, with 141
> That’s correct. In Qt Creator master branch (i.e. 3.1 series) you can choose
> the code model of different languages to use clang as a code model backend
What are the pros/cons of the two options for C++ as it currently stands?
Regards,
Rob.
On 23 January 2014 07:55, Ziller Eike wrote:
>
> O
29 matches
Mail list logo
