Hi guys,
While reviewing https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,59523 Jake Petroules
brought up an interesting point about the list of extensions that would be
worth testing.
Extending this list would make the current test (if else if) getting a bit long
and not necessarily the "good thing
> On 23 Jan 2014, at 21:16, Jan Farø wrote:
>
> I don’t think anybody has mentioned the lack of ability to upgrade hardware -
> mostly because of financial issues, I suppose. 10.6 is as far as I know the
> last Mac OS to support 32 bit systems. Previous versions of my own software
> supported
Hello all,
I just wanted to bring up for a discussion an enhancement which concerns not
only BlackBerry 10 as a platform, but also other platforms Qt runs on as well.
We recently submitted the change
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,75441 (still WIP) which allows a Qt
developer on BB1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Jan Farø wrote:
>
> On 24/01/2014, at 03.46, Alexis Menard wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Jan Farø wrote:
>
>>
>> I don’t think anybody has mentioned the lack of ability to upgrade
>> hardware - mostly because of financial issues, I suppose. 1
On 24/01/2014, at 17.36, Alexis Menard wrote:
>>
>> Again let's balance the cost of the maintenance of the code of 10.6 vs
>> supporting few users stuck in the past? If they must stick in the past for
>> various reasons (financial or others) then they can just use Qt4, it works
>> just fine f
Hi all,
We have now Qt 5.2.1 Release Candidate packages available here:
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.1/2014-01-24_27/
Please start testing these release candidate packages and verifying your fixes.
Plan is to use these packages as a final ones if nothing serious found dur
I just built my App with this or the previuos snapshot. Till now no new bugs -
especialy the iOS header looks native now.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards,
Kevin Olbrich.
(mobil vom iPhone)
--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen.
Wenn Sie nicht d
Hi,
Please just file a bug-report on bugreports.qt-project.org.
Make sure to select the correct component.
There is currently the components “WebKit” for QtWebKit / QtWebKit2 and there
is a separate component “WebEngine” for QtWebEngine related issues.
- Zeno
On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:06, haithem
Hi All,
Before starting work, I though of updating my dev branch as I was away for
a while.
The build fails with the following error:
...
/home/mandeep/work/qt5/qtbase/src/platformsupport/input/evdevtouch/qevdevtouch.cpp:54:19:
fatal error: mtdev.h: No such file or directory
#include
> From the commit log of this file, it looks I'll have to run configure again
> where it'll detect the
> missing header?
Yes. There is now a configure time test for mtdev.
Best regards,
Laszlo
From: development-bounces+laszlo.agocs=digia@qt-project.org
[de
BTW, I saw this in the change-log of the Qt 4.8.6 snapshot:
QtWebkit
- Bring in WebKit revisions 139553 and 139921
Does anybody know if this means support for RFC WebSockets (RFC 6455)?
QtWebKit int Qt 4.8.5 only supports the hixie-76 draft protocol version.
QtWebKit in Qt 5.1+ at leas
Fredag 24. januar 2014 10.25.38 skrev Vladimir Minenko:
> Hello all,
>
> I just wanted to bring up for a discussion an enhancement which concerns not
> only BlackBerry 10 as a platform, but also other platforms Qt runs on as
> well.
>
> We recently submitted the change
> https://codereview.qt-pro
Fredag 24. januar 2014 00.03.21 skrev Denis Shienkov:
> Frederik,
>
> > The CI team cannot really set up the CI without a single test to try
>
> running ...
>
> I added some basic tests, please look here:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,76396
Great, I think this makes setting up th
Hello,
those are only cherry-picks and are unrelated to WebSockets. Other than that
WebKit in 4.8.6 only has a few bug fixes more than 4.8.5.
The unofficial QtWebKit 2.3 release should have better support for the
WebSockets RFC though:
https://blogs.kde.org/2012/11/14/introducing-qtwebkit-23
C
On Friday 24 January 2014 14:08:45 Jocelyn Turcotte wrote:
> Hello,
>
> those are only cherry-picks and are unrelated to WebSockets. Other than that
> WebKit in 4.8.6 only has a few bug fixes more than 4.8.5.
OK, thanks the heads up!
> The unofficial QtWebKit 2.3 release should have better suppor
On 24/01/14 8:35 , Ziller Eike wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2014, at 7:16 PM, Adam Light wrote:
>
>> All but one developer at my (smallish) company is still using OSX
>> 10.6.8 because we need 10.6 to be able to build the current
>> shipping version of our main product. We all use Qt Creator, so a
>> C
That would be absolutely amazing; been hoping for the same myself.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Am 24.01.2014 um 14:04 schrieb Frederik Gladhorn :
> Fredag 24. januar 2014 10.25.38 skrev Vladimir Minenko:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I just wanted to bring up for a discussion an enhancement which concerns not
>> only BlackBerry 10 as a platform, but also other platforms Qt runs on as
>> well.
>>
>
Hi all,
New Qt 4.8.6 snapshots available on
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/4.8/2014-01-24_457/.
Changes in these packages:
a585f2ae4538287ed57237a571e87a03c5a54207 Correct algorithm for digest auth when
using the CONNECT verb
40db54f8182e427f76c663aec15c3a6a682b3c9f QWindowVistaSty
On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 09:37:57, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> Why not just freeze the Qt development for 10.6? After all, developing for
> 10.6 will still be possible with Qt 5.3. I don’t see any problem here. It’s
> not that the code will get removed from the repo; it is only that no new
>
On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 09:25:35, Samuel Gaist wrote:
> Extending this list would make the current test (if else if) getting a bit
> long and not necessarily the "good thing to do (™)" so once the list of
> extension is decided I would like to know what would be the Qtish way to
> sto
>> XP was introduced in 2001. It’s still supported. Mac OS 10.6 was
>> introduced in 2009. I understand the desire to get rid of the messiness
>> under the hood, but I think it should be considered that it cuts out users
>> on hardware platforms not so much up to date.
>
>
> Right but the differenc
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Ziller Eike wrote:
>
> Can you please explain to me though, why you develop on 10.6? You could
> still target 10.6 from newer OS versions, and have your nightly build /
> product build machine on 10.6 to be on the safe side for the actual builds,
> and have a tes
23 matches
Mail list logo
